Liberal Forum

GHETTOBLASTER » 28 Oct 2024, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑

28 Oct 2024, 8:30 am

You have only proven that you disagree with their definition of LIV. 
The Federal Poverty Level....[FPL]  is a loosely defined term as well..
So far all you've managed to prove is that you are a blow hard who is incapable of proving that the numbers in that study are false.

As I said, I DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES NEED TO PROVE THEY HAVE A PIECE OF PROPAGANDA that you **** HEADS think is grand!!

It's DISPROVEN WITHIN ITSELF, DICKWEED!!

Next.

GHETTOBLASTER » 28 Oct 2024, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

28 Oct 2024, 8:41 am

GHETTOBLASTER » Today, 4:38 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 4:38 am
Either furnish your own numbers that disprove the claims that were made in that report or else continue making yourself look like a hysterical ****** Bitch.
It's up to you..... 

Here, let's just CURB STOMP YOUR *** MASSIVELY!! Again!!

What Is Considered Low Income?
A widely used federal guideline defines low income as $14,580 annually for one person and $30,000 for a family of four.
What Is Considered Low Income? - NerdWallet

So that PROVES that using a $50,000 annual income turns your little "study" into, well, PURE UNADULTERED ****!!

Damn, that has to hurt and suck for you at the same time

 
 

     This is what happens when you shove a bee hive up your ***!

*Beekeeper » 28 Oct 2024, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

28 Oct 2024, 11:11 am

Here, let's just CURB STOMP YOUR *** MASSIVELY!! Again!!

So that PROVES that using a $50,000 annual income turns your little "study" into, well, PURE UNADULTERED ****!!

Damn, that has to hurt and suck for you at the same time

GHETTOBLASTER » Today, 4:38 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 4:38 am
Either furnish your own numbers that disprove the claims that were made in that report or else continue making yourself look like a hysterical ****** Bitch.
It's up to you..... 

*Beekeeper » 28 Oct 2024, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

28 Oct 2024, 9:57 am

As I said, I DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES NEED TO PROVE THEY HAVE A PIECE OF PROPAGANDA that you **** HEADS think is grand!!

It's DISPROVEN WITHIN ITSELF, DICKWEED!!

Next.

GHETTOBLASTER » Today, 4:38 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 4:38 am
Either furnish your own numbers that disprove the claims that were made in that report or else continue making yourself look like a hysterical ****** Bitch.
It's up to you..... 
 
 

*Beekeeper » 28 Oct 2024, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

28 Oct 2024, 9:56 am

Not me that has to "prove' the claims since they INVALIDATED THEIR OWN "study" BY USING NON-STANDARD NUMBERS TO GET THE RESULT THEY WANTED!! THAT I PROVED!!

Next. YOU GOT PWNED. AGAIN!!

GHETTOBLASTER » Today, 4:38 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 4:38 am
Either furnish your own numbers that disprove the claims that were made in that report or else continue making yourself look like a hysterical ****** Bitch.
You have failed to prove that  their values for  LIV are false or that using LIV for such a study is "non standard". 
Prove that any such "standards" exist.
It's up to you..... 
 
 
 

*Beekeeper » 28 Oct 2024, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

28 Oct 2024, 11:11 am

Here, let's just CURB STOMP YOUR *** MASSIVELY!! Again!!

So that PROVES that using a $50,000 annual income turns your little "study" into, well, PURE UNADULTERED ****!!

Damn, that has to hurt and suck for you at the same time

Where I live $50,000 is considered low enough income to qualify for a massive reduction in property taxes. 
You're just butt hurt that the study uses a higher thresh hold than what you like.
Suck it up Buttercup and do your own study that is every bit as detailed as the one that has you all worked into a fit of rage......  

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:39 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:39 am

I think

Since when?

GHETTOBLASTER » 28 Oct 2024, 5:32 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Oct 2024, 5:32 pm

Where I live $50,000 is considered low enough income to qualify for a massive reduction in property taxes. 
You're just butt hurt that the study uses a higher thresh hold than what you like.
Suck it up Buttercup and do your own study that is every bit as detailed as the one that has you all worked into a fit of rage......

There it is!!! The WORDS OF SURRENDER that YOU GOT YOUR *** HANDED TO YOU with the excuses and attempts to obfuscate that fact!! 

Enjoy your CURB STOMPING, ASSHOLE!!

GHETTOBLASTER » 28 Oct 2024, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Oct 2024, 12:40 pm

GHETTOBLASTER » Today, 4:38 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 4:38 am
Either furnish your own numbers that disprove the claims that were made in that report or else continue making yourself look like a hysterical ****** Bitch.
You have failed to prove that  their values for  LIV are false or that using LIV for such a study is "non standard". 
Prove that any such "standards" exist.
It's up to you..... 

Does it hurt much??? Sucks I provided the REAL NUMBERS they should have used instead of the ones the had to use to get the predetermined results!!

Enjoy that CURB STOMPING, ******!!

                   

All these discussions based on what the news media has told us. They have been caught numerous times lying. I just wonder why anyone believes anything they say? Most of the fighting here revolves around things we have heard and that we choose to accept or deny, a strange existence by any measure.

*Beekeeper » 29 Oct 2024, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 6:48 am

Does it hurt much??? Sucks I provided the REAL NUMBERS they should have used instead of the ones the had to use to get the predetermined results!!

Enjoy that CURB STOMPING, ******!!

                 

Either furnish your own numbers that disprove the claims that were made in that report or else continue making yourself look like a hysterical ****** Bitch.
You have failed to prove that  their values for  LIV are false or that using LIV for such a study is "non standard". 
Prove that any such "standards" exist.
It's up to you..... 

*Beekeeper » 29 Oct 2024, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 6:47 am

There it is!!! The WORDS OF SURRENDER that YOU GOT YOUR *** HANDED TO YOU with the excuses and attempts to obfuscate that fact!! 

Enjoy your CURB STOMPING, ASSHOLE!!

Either furnish your own numbers that disprove the claims that were made in that report or else continue making yourself look like a hysterical ****** Bitch.
You have failed to prove that  their values for  LIV are false or that using LIV for such a study is "non standard". 
Prove that any such "standards" exist.
It's up to you..... 

 
 

GHETTO BLASTER » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Either furnish your own numbers that disprove the claims that were made in that report or else continue making yourself look like a hysterical ****** Bitch.
You have failed to prove that  their values for  LIV are false or that using LIV for such a study is "non standard". 
Prove that any such "standards" exist.
It's up to you..... 

 
 

No one on the internet accepts proof.

GHETTOBLASTER » 29 Oct 2024, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 8:57 am

Either furnish your own numbers that disprove the claims that were made in that report or else continue making yourself look like a hysterical ****** Bitch.
You have failed to prove that  their values for  LIV are false or that using LIV for such a study is "non standard". 
Prove that any such "standards" exist.
It's up to you..... 

I did. You don't like them. Sucks you are so **** STUPID a LWNJ that blowing them up your *** isn't enough!!

Suck on it BOY, you LOST!!

The CLAIMS in the "report" are BOGUS since they INVENTED A "low income" level that is NOT RECOGNIZED BY ANYONE EXCEPT THEMSELVES. And idiots like YOU that are DUMB ENOUGH to repeat this **** and call it "reliable'.

*Beekeeper » 29 Oct 2024, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 9:02 am

I did. You don't like them. Sucks you are so **** STUPID a LWNJ that blowing them up your *** isn't enough!!

Suck on it BOY, you LOST!!

The CLAIMS in the "report" are BOGUS since they INVENTED A "low income" level that is NOT RECOGNIZED BY ANYONE EXCEPT THEMSELVES. And idiots like YOU that are DUMB ENOUGH to repeat this **** and call it "reliable'.

Either furnish your own numbers that disprove the claims that were made in that report or else continue making yourself look like a hysterical ****** Bitch.
You have failed to prove that  their values for  LIV are false or that using LIV for such a study is "non standard". 
Prove that any such "standards" exist.
It's up to you..... 

*Beekeeper » 29 Oct 2024, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2024, 9:02 am

The CLAIMS in the "report" are BOGUS since they INVENTED A "low income" level that is NOT RECOGNIZED BY ANYONE EXCEPT THEMSELVES..

It took me just a minute to prove you are full of ****.......https://dor.wa.gov/sites/default/files/ ... _20-24.pdf

YOU LOOK SO TOTALLY **** STUPID...TAKE A BOW DUMB ****...!!! 
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 30 Oct 2024, 5:45 am » wrote: ↑

30 Oct 2024, 5:45 am

It took me just a minute to prove you are full of ****.......https://dor.wa.gov/sites/default/files/ ... _20-24.pdf

YOU LOOK SO TOTALLY **** STUPID...TAKE A BOW DUMB ****...!!!

A bunch of numbers on some property tax chart proves what??? That you had to dig for 2 days to find something that you CLAIM "supports" your BOGUS STUDY of ****?? Property tax exemptions HERE have ZERO FOUNDATION IN INCOME, DICKWEED!! As does MANY STATES!! So what DOES this chart say exactly?? And why does it exist?? NO FOUNDATIONAL EXPLANATION except a "chart"?? What kind of **** MORON does this **** besides YOU when you got your *** KICKED. Over and over and over.

Please, try harder and GO POUND **** SAND you low life PIECE OF PIG ****!!

*Beekeeper » 30 Oct 2024, 5:56 am » wrote: ↑

30 Oct 2024, 5:56 am

A bunch of numbers on some property tax chart proves what??? That you had to dig for 2 days to find something that you CLAIM "supports" your BOGUS STUDY of ****?? Property tax exemptions HERE have ZERO FOUNDATION IN INCOME, DICKWEED!! As does MANY STATES!! So what DOES this chart say exactly?? And why does it exist?? NO FOUNDATIONAL EXPLANATION except a "chart"?? What kind of **** MORON does this **** besides YOU when you got your *** KICKED. Over and over and over.

Please, try harder and GO POUND **** SAND you low life PIECE OF PIG ****!!

The CLAIMS in the "report" are BOGUS since they INVENTED A "low income" level that is NOT RECOGNIZED BY ANYONE EXCEPT THEMSELVES..

It took me just a minute to prove you are full of ****.......https://dor.wa.gov/sites/default/files/ ... _20-24.pdf

YOU LOOK SO TOTALLY **** STUPID...TAKE A BOW DUMB ****...!!! 
 
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 28 Oct 2024, 6:23 am » wrote: ↑

28 Oct 2024, 6:23 am

Either disprove it or stop screaming  like a hysterical little ****** bitch....