Sumela » 27 Oct 2024, 7:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Sir, Empire. Much bigger than just Progressives.
But, yes, I get your point.
DeezerShoove » 28 Oct 2024, 6:16 am » wrote: ↑ Do you have any line at which, if crossed, you will not support a dem?
maineman » 28 Oct 2024, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah. I voted for Anderson in 1980 because Jimmy Carter did not turn Tehran into a glass parking lot after they captured our embassy.
Crowd Goes Wild as Tucker Carlson Rocks the Stage With Epic Speech“No fair system would make Liz Cheney powerful. No fair system would make Larry Fink rich. No fair system would elevate someone like Kamala Harris to a presidential nomination.” “Liz Cheney is out there with Kamala Harris, and there's Bobby Kennedy calling to protect women's sports at a Trump rally. It's a realignment. It's unbelievable.”“You [the so-called “elite”] are not better than us. No, you are not smarter than us. No, you do not deserve what you have. You probably stole it.”“The big lie is that they're impressive. That's what the big lie is, that the people in charge have somehow earned the right to rule over you, and they haven't.”“Donald Trump has made it possible for the rest of us to tell the truth about the world around us. And that's the single most liberating thing you can do for people.”
maineman » 27 Oct 2024, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑ why'd you tag ME on that? I have NEVER supported any of that.
nefarious101 » 28 Oct 2024, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑ yes you do....you are a progressive democrat....you support it all
maineman » 28 Oct 2024, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑ **** you. I do not support it all. Again... do YOU support every single plank of the GOP platform?
nefarious101 » 28 Oct 2024, 7:51 am » wrote: ↑ you're a progressive democrat...you do support that ****....you can't opt out...or should I say "Run and Hide" when it's inconvenient for you have to publicly answer for what you believe in
You take big planks in your ***.maineman » 28 Oct 2024, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑ you are wrong. There are planks in my party's platform that I do not support, just as I would imagine there are planks in YOUR party's platform that you do not support.
^^^*** wishlist...
you cryin'?
Ed Koch:maineman » 27 Oct 2024, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑ How about you, Rog? Do you support every single plank in the Republican party platform without exception? Y/N?
maineman » 28 Oct 2024, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑ you are wrong. There are planks in my party's platform that I do not support, just as I would imagine there are planks in YOUR party's platform that you do not support.
*JohnEdgarSlowHorses » 27 Oct 2024, 7:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Go ahead **** try another J6. I hope this punk tries.
Get his egg yolk splattered all over the pavement.
https://i.postimg.cc/RZNMcb7W/comp.jpg
nefarious101 » 28 Oct 2024, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑ your party!!...your support....and here you are running away from your party....but yet you still support the party of legalized pedophilia.....go team!....right?
*Huey » 28 Oct 2024, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑ Ed Koch:
“If you agree with me on 9 out of 12 issues, vote for me. If you agree with me on 12 out of 12 issues, see a psychiatrist.”
https://i.postimg.cc/9QXxHD5p/****-you.gifVegas » 28 Oct 2024, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ So you post my "**** our government" out of context. Just like an immature middle schooler would do. I would ask if you bothered to read the OP as to why I say that, but we both know the answer.
https://youtu.be/wzoPZwa4dWo?si=B3W8ex3C822PM28ZMajik » 27 Oct 2024, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑ A prominent doctor and trans rights advocate admitted she deliberately withheld publication of a $10 million taxpayer-funded study on the effect of puberty blockers on American children — after finding no evidence that they improve patients’ mental health.Dr. Johanna Olson-Kennedy told the New York Times that she believes the study would be “weaponized” by critics of transgender care for kids, and that the research could one day be used in court to argue “we shouldn’t use blockers.”Critics — including one of Olson-Kennedy’s fellow researchers on the study — said the decision flies in the face of research standards and deprives the public of “really important” science in a field where Americans remain firmly divided.
For the National Institutes of Health-funded study, researchers chose 95 kids — who had an average age of 11 — and gave them puberty-blocking drugs starting in 2015. The treatments are meant to delay the onset of bodily changes like the development of breasts or the deepening of the voice.After following up with the youths for two years, the treatments did not improve the state of their mental health, which Olson-Kennedy chalked up to the kids being “in really good shape” both when they started and concluded the two-year treatment.
https://nypost.com/2024/10/23/us-news/d ... al-health/
@Blackvegetable
@maineman