Are these you actual words, dumb ****?ROG62 » 30 Oct 2024, 12:06 am » wrote: ↑ dissent /dĭ-sĕnt′/
intransitive verbYes, you stupid ****...past tense...he disagreed, but the jury thought otherwise...
- To have or express an opinion different from a prevailing or official position; disagree.
- To reach a conclusion contrary to the majority of the judges deciding a case; render a minority opinion.
- To differ in opinion; to be of unlike or contrary sentiment; to disagree; -- followed by from.
Similar: dissented
the jury has the final say...regardless of your fee fees...
You are using the past tense of the word as an adverb. An opinion can't be "dissented"...his dissented opinion...
Stop being a **** and read the linked article to learn the facts.ROG62 » 30 Oct 2024, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ **** brown, cling all you want, but jury's do...
it's his **** AFTER THE FACT opinion...
again, he can only instruct the jury on the law prior to deliberations...
if her lawyers thought differently, they would either appeal or file for a mistrial...
cling desperation boi...CLING!
BTW, the evidence Kaplan claims is there, wasn't enough for the jury to find him guilty of it...so go have a good cry...
Blackvegetable » 30 Oct 2024, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ Stop being a **** and read the linked article to learn the facts.
*Yawns*....Blackvegetable » 30 Oct 2024, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑ Are these you actual words, dumb ****?
You are using the past tense of the word as an adverb. An opinion can't be "dissented"...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom brown, did Kaplan's response change the jury's verdict? Yes or No?Blackvegetable » 30 Oct 2024, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ Stop being a **** and read the linked article to learn the facts.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Stop being a **** idiot.ROG62 » 30 Oct 2024, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑ *Yawns*....
Look at the BOLDED definition , ****...he's "disagreeing" with the jury's decision...
but since all you have is some word usage blather, I guess I'll just have to thank you for your concession...
No...it clarified it....because Team Grifty was misrepresenting it to the public.ROG62 » 30 Oct 2024, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑ brown, did Kaplan's response change the jury's verdict? Yes or No?
Sad you cant answer a simple yes or no question.Blackvegetable » 30 Oct 2024, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑ No...it clarified it....because Team Grifty was misrepresenting it to the public.
Then the ******* should have "clarified it during his jury instructions...Blackvegetable » 30 Oct 2024, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑ No...it clarified it....because Team Grifty was misrepresenting it to the public.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom It can, however, only one of the 3 definitions referred to judges and other judges in the legal sense...oops...Blackvegetable » 30 Oct 2024, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Stop being a **** idiot.
"Dissent" has a specific meaning in the context of legal procedure.
It wasn't a "dissent". It was a clarification obliged by the false statements from Team Grifty.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom JuCo,ROG62 » 30 Oct 2024, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Then the ******* should have "clarified it during his jury instructions...
When the verdict came back not to his liking, his fee fees got in the way...
apparently EVERY news outlet either reported it wrong or for they're all for "Team Grifty"...what say you?
Post the date of the verdict.When the verdict came back not to his liking, his fee fees got in the way...
See above.apparently EVERY news outlet either reported it wrong
Here some fun facts
All you had to do was read a few **** paragraphs..ROG62 » 30 Oct 2024, 5:18 pm » wrote: ↑ It can, however, only one of the 3 definitions referred to judges and other judges in the legal sense...oops...
no "false statements", brown...it was decided by a jury of his peers...and guess what, it wasn't "rape"...need a tissue?
The only "fact" is the JURY did NOT find him guilty of rape...Blackvegetable » 30 Oct 2024, 5:58 pm » wrote: ↑ JuCo,
What chance do my facts stand against your Invincible Ignorance?
This was a DEFAMATION case.
Post the date of the verdict.
Post the date of the judge's clarification.
See above.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom "the JURY rejected that — made other findings,"Blackvegetable » 30 Oct 2024, 6:38 pm » wrote: ↑ All you had to do was read a few **** paragraphs..
After Donald Trump was found liable for sexually abusing and defaming E. Jean Carroll, his legal team and his defenders lodged a frequent talking point.
Despite Carroll’s claims that Trump had raped her, they noted, the jury stopped short of saying he committed that particular offense. Instead, jurors opted for a second option: sexual abuse.
“This was a rape claim, this was a rape case all along, and the jury rejected that — made other findings,” his lawyer, Joe Tacopina, said outside the courthouse.
A judge has now clarified that this is basically a legal distinction without a real-world difference. He says that what the jury found Trump did was in fact rape, as commonly understood.
so **** stupid.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom "the JURY rejected that — made other findings,"ROG62 » 30 Oct 2024, 6:46 pm » wrote: ↑ "the JURY rejected that — made other findings,"
who has the final say, brown? The JURY...
pretty **** black and white
so **** stupid...
Do it, running vaginaROG62 » 30 Oct 2024, 6:42 pm » wrote: ↑ The only "fact" is the JURY did NOT find him guilty of rape...
type of case is irrelevant
why?
the judge **** up
see above...
STFU *** B4 U GET HURTBooRadley » 30 Oct 2024, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Here some fun facts
You are a virgin when it comes to sex with a woman
You are a not a virgin when it comes to sex with a man
It is unknown if you are a virgin when it comes to sex with animals
Bring it ***. I will hurt you