Why don't you tell us what is SO "devastating" about cutting taxes and regulations back from what Biden and Kamaltoe raised and added over the past 4 years, dickhead?Blackvegetable » 31 Oct 2024, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm quite surprised, given the plethora of FOX trained economists on the forum, that no one has stepped up to speak in defense of Grifty's devastating economic vision thing.
Zeet,Zeets2 » 01 Nov 2024, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑ Why don't you tell us what is SO "devastating" about cutting taxes and regulations back from what Biden and Kamaltoe raised and added over the past 4 years, dickhead?
What's so devastating about finishing the border wall and allowing border guards to enforce the law and stop millions of illegals from flooding the country the way Biden and Kamaltoe want?
What's so devastating about cutting all the Biden executive orders that removed millions of acres of tundra in ANWR from oil and gas drilling, along with removing even more from off-shore drilling and from drilling on some of the federal lands that Biden took away or restarting the Keystone pipeline, while cutting the additional fees and regulations on oil drilling and fracking that Biden and Kamaltoe passed that have raised the price of gas despite him breaking his promise to forbid all new drilling?
What's so devastating to the country about rounding up the millions of illegals that Biden and Kamaltoe have ushered into the country and sending them back where they belong and saving the tens of billions we're now paying to put them in hotels, give them free food, free healthcare, free education, free smartphones, and free debit cards?
What's so devastating about ending biological men in women's sports and ending the Biden/Kamaltoe policy of insisting that biological men can use women's restrooms, locker rooms and showers, especially in schools?
What's so devastating about ending Kamaltoe's "no cash bail" laws and eliminating the prosecution of theft that's less than $950?
So unless you can tell us how ANY of that will "devastate" the country as you so stupidly claim, you should shut the **** up with such idiotic questions!
Got it, ****?
Oh, is HE running for president too, you **** idiot?
You debate two types of evolution theory, genetic and social, as though they are the same thing, and they never were any generation gap in intellectual history..
Choke you **** spewing asshole.31st Arrival » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You debate two types of evolution theory, genetic and social, as though they are the same thing, and they never were any generation gap in intellectual history..
If not voting for someone you don't want to see in office makes you a "world class ******", then I'm guilty.
No...I'm saying you are contradicting yourself.ConsRule » 01 Nov 2024, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑ If not voting for someone you don't want to see in office makes you a "world class ******", then I'm guilty.
Are you really saying it is better to vote for someone you don't want to see elected that to simply abstain?
SCORECARD
BV questions asked = 4 Questions answered by ConsRule = 4
ConsRule questions asked = 4 Questions answered by BV = 1
In Texas, I felt safe doing that. As of yesterday, Trump was up by almost 7 points.
**** you up your bicycle stealing ***.
No I wasn't. I really don't want Trump to be POTUS again. But I would MUCH rather him over Commie-lahaha. Trump is comfortably ahead of her where I live so there is relatively little risk of her getting the electoral votes of TX. If I don't want either to be POTUS, why would I vote for either?
Texas won't vote in favor of that ****.ConsRule » Today, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑ No I wasn't. I really don't want Trump to be POTUS again. But I would MUCH rather him over Commie-lahaha. Trump is comfortably ahead of her where I live so there is relatively little risk of her getting the electoral votes of TX. If I don't want either to be POTUS, why would I vote for either?
SCORECARD
BV questions asked = 4 Questions answered by ConsRule = 4
ConsRule questions asked = 4 Questions answered by BV = 2
Because you insist you don't vote for a candidate...you claim you vote for an elector...ConsRule » 01 Nov 2024, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑ No I wasn't. I really don't want Trump to be POTUS again. But I would MUCH rather him over Commie-lahaha. Trump is comfortably ahead of her where I live so there is relatively little risk of her getting the electoral votes of TX. If I don't want either to be POTUS, why would I vote for either?
SCORECARD
BV questions asked = 4 Questions answered by ConsRule = 4
ConsRule questions asked = 4 Questions answered by BV = 2
Rapist, felon, grifter, 2xWorse than Buchanan.But I would MUCH rather him over Commie-lahaha.
Doesn't it take discrimination to understand the differences between instinctively right and intellectually wrong throughout history recording the methods of governing people to think beyond adapting as displaced so far?Blackvegetable » 01 Nov 2024, 7:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Because you insist you don't vote for a candidate...you claim you vote for an elector...
Rapist, felon, grifter, 2xWorse than Buchanan.
you're a discriminating fella...
Lol, *** spews more media garbage. Hey dick sucker, do you know anything the TV hasn't told you? Why are you a ***, ***?Blackvegetable » 31 Oct 2024, 5:03 am » wrote: ↑ ...are any of you innumerate toadying **** gonna insist that Grifty is an economic savant?
MAGAt eating grit in 2026 - "It's supposed to suck...It's all according to The Plan. Yam Daddy is a genius."
And I really don't want Trump's electors to represent TX.Blackvegetable » 01 Nov 2024, 7:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Because you insist you don't vote for a candidate...you claim you vote for an elector...
Go suck some more MuriKKKa dick, ***. With any luck you'll choke to death on one.Sumela » 01 Nov 2024, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Look at this thread...
MuriKKKa is spiraling down.
BANANA REPUBLIC