Blackvegetable » 12 Oct 2025, 6:35 am » wrote: ↑ You kicked me off for "stalking", Hysterical ****.
You can't even define it.
Who said anything about repercussions?DeezerShoove » 12 Oct 2025, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑ ...and the repercussions were horrific.
The site shut down, wailing and gnashing of teeth, self-flagellation, etc.
Thank the Lords of Flatbush, you returned on your own.
Go **** yourself.
What did it get wrong?*Beekeeper » 12 Oct 2025, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑ Welp, that didn't age well.
Sucks for your **** huh, MORON.
So g'ddamn STUPID
Blackvegetable » 12 Oct 2025, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ Who said anything about repercussions?
This is about your ******, ****.
Focus.
Coozie,DeezerShoove » 12 Oct 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Who can focus on that constant flow of **** from you?
btw Do you even know what "repercussions" means?
Blackvegetable » 12 Oct 2025, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Coozie,
The university from which I graduated is far more selective than yours...why do you insist on going there?
Blackvegetable » 01 Nov 2024, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ whose media?
as a matter of principle, as a matter of character, Trump has proven himself unworthy to be this country’s chief executive again.
Hold on a second.DeezerShoove » 12 Oct 2025, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Perfect.![]()
![]()
I love when people feel the need to boast "credentials". It's quite like when a racehorse's knee explodes.
Just in case it isn't already obvious to your really stupid ***, that **** doesn't intimidate at all.
I easily swim among many academics and PhD's face-to-face.
Whom do you believe I'm quoting?
You're echoing the belief.....I don't give a **** further than the obvious.
Blackvegetable » 12 Oct 2025, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Hold on a second.
You presume to question my grasp of English.
I'm jusI' kicking you back into your lane.
Try again, Coward.RebelGator » 12 Oct 2025, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑ You're echoing the belief.....I don't give a **** further than the obvious.
You have nothing.*Beekeeper » 12 Oct 2025, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑ The entire premise, *******!!
Are you really that **** DEFT?
Never mind, we ALL know that answer.
BumpBlackvegetable » 01 Nov 2024, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑ 23 Nobel Laureates Can’t Be Wrong About Trump
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/artic ... rump-right
“Simply put, Harris’s policies will result in a stronger economic performance, with economic growth that is more robust, more sustainable, and more equitable,” the Nobel laureates wrote in the letter. Donald Trump’s policies, they added, would “lead to higher prices, larger deficits, and greater inequality.” As for Harris, they wrote that she “has emphasized policies that strengthen the middle class, enhance competition, and promote entrepreneurship. On issue after issue, Harris’s economic agenda will do far more than Donald Trump’s to increase the economic strength and well-being of our nation and its people.”
Gotta give 'em credit for trying...
"Simply put...."
unfortunately, Daddy must spank America...
F'n A, MAGAts are some dumb ****.