Liberal Forum

*Huey » 04 Nov 2024, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 7:20 am

Let me posts [sic] this again, Seaman:

McRaven served as assault team leader but was relieved of duty in 1983 due to McRaven's concerns about military discipline, and difficulties in keeping his sailors in line at the command.

He was not "relieved of command."  Being an assault team leader in Seal Team Six is not a Naval "command."  You seem incapable of grasping that simple fact, flyboy.
.
 
 

maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 7:49 am

He was not "relieved of command."  Being an assault team leader in Seal Team Six is not a Naval "command."  You seem incapable of grasping that simple fact, flyboy.
.

Not "fly" as much as "cargo" or "stewardess"

*Huey » 03 Nov 2024, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2024, 12:04 pm

He was also relieved of command.

Right here

Still wrong.

I have repeatedly said that, throughout his career, Admiral McRaven commanded many Navy units and organizations.  Every time he left one of those assignments, he was "relieved of command" by his successor.  His transfer from Seal Team Six in 1983 was NOT one of those occasions.

You clearly don't have a **** clue what you are talking about. 

maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 8:28 am

Right here

Still wrong.

I have repeatedly said that, throughout his career, Admiral McRaven commanded many Navy units and organizations.  Every time he left one of those assignments, he was "relieved of command" by his successor.  His transfer from Seal Team Six in 1983 was NOT one of those occasions.

You clearly don't have a **** clue what you are talking about.

**** YOU... YOU ARE A PROVEN PATHOLOGICAL **** POS LIAR

maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 8:28 am

Right here

Still wrong.

I have repeatedly said that, throughout his career, Admiral McRaven commanded many Navy units and organizations.  Every time he left one of those assignments, he was "relieved of command" by his successor.  His transfer from Seal Team Six in 1983 was NOT one of those occasions.

You clearly don't have a **** clue what you are talking about. 

 

Let me posts [sic] this again, Seaman:

McRaven served as assault team leader but was relieved of duty in 1983 due to McRaven's concerns about military discipline, and difficulties in keeping his sailors in line at the command.

McRaven was not in command of Seal Team 6.  Keep posting the same lies seaman.  

*Huey » 04 Nov 2024, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 8:58 am

Let me posts [sic] this again, Seaman:

McRaven served as assault team leader but was relieved of duty in 1983 due to McRaven's concerns about military discipline, and difficulties in keeping his sailors in line at the command.

McRaven was not in command of Seal Team 6.  Keep posting the same lies seaman.

I have never said he was in command of Seal Team Six in 1983 at the time of his transfer at the hands of CDR Marchinko.  This goes to my original point, which you refuse to grasp:  McRaven was not relieved of command of a squad in ST6 by Marchinko.  He did not have "command" of anything in 1983.  Ergo, you were wrong when you said he was relieved of command.  I went on to say - repeatedly- that on many occasions later on in his illustrious career, McRaven WAS "relieved of command" by his successors.  1983 was NOT one of those times.

maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 9:07 am

I have never said he was in command of Seal Team Six in 1983 at the time of his transfer at the hands of CDR Marchinko.  This goes to my original point, which you refuse to grasp:  McRaven was not relieved of command of a squad in ST6 by Marchinko.  He did not have "command" of anything in 1983.  Ergo, you were wrong when you said he was relieved of command.  I went on to say - repeatedly- that on many occasions later on in his illustrious career, McRaven WAS "relieved of command" by his successors.  1983 was NOT one of those times.

 

Then this doesn't apply:

Every time he left one of those assignments, he was "relieved of command" by his successor.  His transfer from Seal Team Six in 1983 was NOT one of those occasions.

Oh, so in was just a young naval officer not in charge of anything.  Stop **** lying.  

*Huey » 04 Nov 2024, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 9:12 am

Then this doesn't apply:

Every time he left one of those assignments, he was "relieved of command" by his successor.  His transfer from Seal Team Six in 1983 was NOT one of those occasions.

Oh, so in was just a young naval officer not in charge of anything.  Stop **** lying.

he was not "in command" of anything in 1983.  When you said he was "relieved of command," you were wrong.

maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 9:19 am

he was not "in command" of anything in 1983.  When you said he was "relieved of command," you were wrong.

I didn't say it.  The article did.  SO again, you are saying he was not in any position of leadership.  Yes or no......

*Huey » 03 Nov 2024, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2024, 12:04 pm

He was also relieved of command.

you didn't say it?

hmmmmm

explain this post then.

*Huey » 04 Nov 2024, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 9:21 am

I didn't say it.  The article did.  SO again, you are saying he was not in any position of leadership.  Yes or no......

And the article did NOT say that McRaven was "relieved of command."  It said he was "relieved of duty."

Every naval officer from ensign to admiral is in a position of leadership.  They are not all "in command".
 

maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 7:49 am

He was not "relieved of command."  Being an assault team leader in Seal Team Six is not a Naval "command."  You seem incapable of grasping that simple fact, flyboy.
.

Currently 1 out of every 25 people walking around the USA is an Illegal Alien.
If you are against Trump....YOU ARE FOR HAVING MILLIONS MORE ILLEGAL ALIENS ENTER THE USA.
Anyone who is for the deliberate transformation of the USA into a single party Banana Republic is a **** traitor.

maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 9:29 am

And the article did NOT say that McRaven was "relieved of command."  It said he was "relieved of duty."

Every naval officer from ensign to admiral is in a position of leadership.  They are not all "in command".

Another **** asswipe that can't answer a simple yes or no question...

maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 9:29 am

And the article did NOT say that McRaven was "relieved of command."  It said he was "relieved of duty."

Every naval officer from ensign to admiral is in a position of leadership.  They are not all "in command".

This is what happened you low life piece of **** LIAR.....

"McRaven served as assault team leader but was relieved of duty in 1983 due to McRaven's concerns about military discipline, and difficulties in keeping his sailors in line at the command. Richard Marcinko fired the 27-year-old McRaven in 1983. "He was a bright guy, but he didn't like my rude and crude way," Marcinko said. "If I was a loose cannon, he was too rigid. He took the special out of special warfare.""

How did that dose of truth taste to you **** Head....?

maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 9:29 am

And the article did NOT say that McRaven was "relieved of command."  It said he was "relieved of duty."

Every naval officer from ensign to admiral is in a position of leadership.  They are not all "in command".
 

 

You are playhing semantics.  Remember, you first post about my info was he was relieved because his successor took over.  That was a lie.  I'll show you.

maineman » 03 Nov 2024, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2024, 3:15 pm

...at the end of his tour of duty, by his designated successor.  It happens to everyone in command.

But now you are saying he wasn't in command.  You are a weird little person. 
 

*Huey » 04 Nov 2024, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 9:55 am

But now you are saying he wasn't in command.  You are a weird little person.

That post had nothing to do with Seal Team Six.  It had to do with McRaven's career path.

He has, in fact, been "relieved of command" several times in his illustrious career, but not in 1983, and not by Commander Marcinko.  At that time, he was relieved of duty... like your article says.

And I am certainly NOT playing semantics.  Words have meanings.  "Command" has a very specific meaning in the Navy.   McRaven did not have command in 1983, therefore, he could not be relieved of it.

Are you really this **** thick?  
 

maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 10:25 am

That post had nothing to do with Seal Team Six.  It has to do with McRaven's career path.

He has, in fact, been "relieved of command" several times in his illustrious career, but not in 1983, and not by Commander Marcinko.  At that time, he was relieved of duty... like your article says.

And I am certainly NOT playing semantics.  Words have meanings.  "Command" has a very specific meaning in the Navy.   McRaven did not have command in 1983, therefore, he could not be relieved of it.

Are you really this **** thick?

Yes YOU are that **** stupid... you lying stolen valor asshole

maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 10:25 am

That post had nothing to do with Seal Team Six.  It has to do with McRaven's career path.

He has, in fact, been "relieved of command" several times in his illustrious career, but not in 1983, and not by Commander Marcinko.  At that time, he was relieved of duty... like your article says.

And I am certainly NOT playing semantics.  Words have meanings.  "Command" has a very specific meaning in the Navy.   McRaven did not have command in 1983, therefore, he could not be relieved of it.

Are you really this **** thick?  

 

That post had nothing to do with Seal Team Six.  It has to do with McRaven's career path.

****, liar.  It was in response to me posting he was relieved by Marcinko.  It had everything to do with it. 


 

*Huey » 04 Nov 2024, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 10:32 am

****, liar.  It was in response to me posting he was relieved by Marcinko.  It had everything to do with it.

Wrong.  You made an incorrect inference.  My statement was factual.  He has, in fact, been relieved of command several times in his career, but not in 1983 and not by CDR Marcinko.

As I have said over and over again... he was not IN command in 1983 so he could not be relieved OF command.  YOU claimed he was.   YOU were wrong.  YOU don't have the balls to admit it.  YOU'RE a ******.