Liberal Forum

maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 10:36 am

Wrong.  YOu made an incorrect inference.  My statement was factual.  He has, in fact, been relieved of command several times in his career, but not in 1983 and not by CDR Marcinko.

As I have said over and over again... he was not IN command in 1983 so he could not be relieved OF command.  YOU claimed he was.   YOU were wrong.  YOU don't have the balls to admit it.  YOU'RE a ******.    
 

 

Nope, that was a very specific comment. 

You lied.  Again.

maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 10:25 am

That post had nothing to do with Seal Team Six.  It had to do with McRaven's career path.

He has, in fact, been "relieved of command" several times in his illustrious career, but not in 1983, and not by Commander Marcinko.  At that time, he was relieved of duty... like your article says.

And I am certainly NOT playing semantics.  Words have meanings.  "Command" has a very specific meaning in the Navy.   McRaven did not have command in 1983, therefore, he could not be relieved of it.

Are you really this **** thick?

@*Day367ofHooooeyVagina **** up military jargon?

 

*Huey » 04 Nov 2024, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 10:39 am

Nope, that was a very specific comment. 

You lied.  Again.

It WAS a very specific comment, and it was ENTIRELY true. It did NOT imply that McRaven was relieved of command of ST6 at the end of his tour.  You incorrectly inferred it.  That's YOUR problem, not mine.  

McRaven WAS INDEED relieved of command - on several occasions - and each time it happened, the guy who relieved him was his designated replacement.

maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 12:13 pm

It WAS a very specific comment, and it was ENTIRELY true. It did NOT imply that McRaven was relieved of command of ST6 at the end of his tour.  You incorrectly inferred it.  That's YOUR problem, not mine.  

McRaven WAS INDEED relieved of command - on several occasions - and each time it happened, the guy who relieved him was his designated replacement.

you are a **** ****** coward like him

maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 12:13 pm

It WAS a very specific comment, and it was ENTIRELY true. It did NOT imply that McRaven was relieved of command of ST6 at the end of his tour.  You incorrectly inferred it.  That's YOUR problem, not mine.  

McRaven WAS INDEED relieved of command - on several occasions - and each time it happened, the guy who relieved him was his designated replacement.

Sure....NOT.  Was it your honesty and integrity issues that prevented you from commanding a ship?
 
 

*Huey » 04 Nov 2024, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 12:39 pm

Sure....NOT.  Was it your honesty and integrity issues that prevented you from commanding a ship?

My statement was 100% accurate.  I am not responsible for your faulty inference, flyboy.

I showed you where your own article did NOT say that McRaven had been relieved of command and that you had erroneously - dishonestly - said otherwise.

You're dismissed.  

maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 1:19 pm

My statement was 100% accurate.  I am not responsible for your faulty inference, flyboy.

I showed you where your own article did NOT say that McRaven had been relieved of command and that you had erroneously - dishonestly - said otherwise.

You're dismissed.  

 

Excuse me but I want to help!!  Here are some Progressive Democratics talking points to help YOU connect with voters.

Just pick out the Progressive Democrat talking points that best describes Progressive Democratics and make sure you keep eye contact as everyone loves sincerity. 

Make sure you point out that your party is hands on when it comes to preparing America's children for a more productive life 

Tell them that....

Democrat progressives and all their supporters are completely in favor of legalized pedophilia?

or that...

Democrat Progressives and all their supporters are in favor of using government schools to sexualized young children

or that.....

Democrat Progressives and all their supporters are in favor of mutilating and sterilizing little children...and labeling parents who try to protect their kids "Domestic Terrorists"

or that...

Democrat Progressives and all their supporters are in favor of open borders to sex traffic children for the pedophiles that offer support to democrat progressives.

or that....

Democrat Progressives and all their supporters are in favor of putting illegal aliens over American families

or that...

Democrat Progressives and all their supporters are in favor of using government to cancel and persecute anyone who disagrees with them

maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 7:49 am

He was not "relieved of command."  Being an assault team leader in Seal Team Six is not a Naval "command."  You seem incapable of grasping that simple fact, flyboy.
.

McRaven served as assault team leader but was relieved of duty in 1983 due to McRaven's concerns about military discipline, and difficulties in keeping his sailors in line at the command.


Just so we are clear.  You argument is that statement is false

maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 10:25 am

He has, in fact, been "relieved of command" several times in his illustrious career, but not in 1983, and not by Commander Marcinko.

HERE YOU GO AGAIN LIARBOY.....https://www.reddit.com/r/JSOCarchive/
 "Why Admiral McRaven was kicked out of ST6 by Dick Marcinko.In 1982 McRaven served as assault team leader at ST6. But was relieved of his duty in 1983. Due to McRaven's concerns about military discipline, and difficulties in keeping his sailors in line at the command. Dick Marcinko fired McRaven in 1983. And was transferred to a regular east coast SEAL Team."
 
FIND SOMETHING.....ANYTHING IN PRINT THAT DEBUNKS THE FACT THAT McRAVEN WAS UNFIT TO LEAD ST6 AND SUBSEQUENTLY FIRED
 

*Huey » 04 Nov 2024, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 1:47 pm

McRaven served as assault team leader but was relieved of duty in 1983 due to McRaven's concerns about military discipline, and difficulties in keeping his sailors in line at the command.

Just so we are clear.  You argument is that statement is false

NO.  Just so we're clear, the phrase "relieved of duty" is NOT - I REPEAT NOT - I REPEAT NOT synonymous with "relieved of command."

He was not IN command in 1983, so it is impossible for him to be relieved of command.

****.  You really are dumber than a **** box of rocks, aren't ya?

maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 2:23 pm

NO.  Just so we're clear, the phrase "relieved of duty" is NOT - I REPEAT NOT - I REPEAT NOT synonymous with "relieved of command."

He was not IN command in 1983, so it is impossible for him to be relieved of command.

****.  You really are dumber than a **** box of rocks, aren't ya?

As I said earlier you got caught in a semantics game to cover your lies.

He was relieved of duty. I means he was fired. 

maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 2:23 pm

He was not IN command in 1983, so it is impossible for him to be relieved of command.

****.  You really are dumber than a **** box of rocks, aren't ya?

."In 1982 McRaven served as assault team leader at ST6. But was relieved of his duty in 1983. Due to McRaven's concerns about military discipline, and difficulties in keeping his sailors in line at the command. Dick Marcinko fired McRaven in 1983"
 

*Huey » 04 Nov 2024, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 2:25 pm

As I said earlier you got caught in a semantics game to cover your lies.

He was relieved of duty. I means he was fired.

I have told the absolute truth about this in every post.

YOU said he was -quote-relieved of command- unquote. I called you on it, and you've been tap dancing ever since.

Just admit you were wrong and that he was NOT relieved of command in 1983 and be done with this silliness.

maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 2:29 pm

I have told the absolute truth about this in every post.

YOU said he was -quote-relieved of command- unquote. I called you on it, and you've been tap dancing ever since.

Just admit you were wrong and that he was NOT relieved of command in 1983 and be done with this silliness.

The link proves you are a **** liar.

Post 1 minute ago
GHETTO BLASTER, who is currently on your ignore list, made this post.
Display this post.

 
 

maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 2:29 pm

I have told the absolute truth about this in every post.

YOU said he was -quote-relieved of command- unquote. I called you on it, and you've been tap dancing ever since.

Just admit you were wrong and that he was NOT relieved of command in 1983 and be done with this silliness.

 

Again, was or was he not removed from a leadership position?  ANd I will go back an repost your initial response to what I posted.  

maineman » 03 Nov 2024, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2024, 3:15 pm

...at the end of his tour of duty, by his designated successor.  It happens to everyone in command.

 

But now you are saying he wasn't in command.  You are a weird little person. 
 

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2024, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 11:50 am

@*Day367ofHooooeyVagina **** up military jargon?

BE A GOOD LITTLE BED WETTING DRAFT DODGER AND SIT YOUR *** BACK DOWN.... CLOWN.....  

 

*Huey » 04 Nov 2024, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 2:37 pm

But now you are saying he wasn't in command.  You are a weird little person.

That post did not describe the end of his tour of duty on Seal Team Six.  You have had that fact explained and re-explained to you repeatedly.  How **** dumb are you? He has been in command during several tours of duty, and has been relieved of command at all of those by the man sent to be his successor.  

That was NOT the case for ST6.  In that instance, he was "relieved of duty" by a despicable naval officer who would later show himself to be a dishonest fraud, a felon, and a convicted one at that.  McRaven would demonstrate that his former loser boss's opinion was inaccurate.  He would show himself to be worthy of the utmost respect and responsibility by rising to the highest rank in the service. 

maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 2:31 pm

Post 1 minute ago
GHETTO BLASTER, who is currently on your ignore list, made this post.
Display this post.

LOOK AT MM PRETENDING HE DIDN'T READ THIS POST...!!!! YOU ONLY FOOL YOURSELF...!!!
."In 1982 McRaven served as assault team leader at ST6. But was relieved of his duty in 1983. Due to McRaven's concerns about military discipline, and difficulties in keeping his sailors in line at the command. Dick Marcinko fired McRaven in 1983"