*Huey » 04 Nov 2024, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Again, was or was he not removed from a leadership position? ANd I will go back an repost your initial response to what I posted.
HAVE A GOOD LOOK AT "DESPICABLE" DICK MARCINKO'S WAR RECORD YOU LITTLE ****** BITCHmaineman » 04 Nov 2024, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑ ........." by a despicable naval officer [Dick Marcinko] who would later show himself to be a dishonest fraud, a felon, and a convicted one at that.
Liarmaineman » 04 Nov 2024, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑ He was not relieved of command at ST6. Several times in his long and illustrious career, Admiral McRaven WAS relieved of command, and in every one of those instances, he was relieved at the end of his assigned tour of duty by the man sent to be his successor in command of that unit.
Focus, Gilligan:maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑ He was not relieved of command at ST6. Several times in his long and illustrious career, Admiral McRaven WAS relieved of command, and in every one of those instances, he was relieved at the end of his assigned tour of duty by the man sent to be his successor in command of that unit.
Focus Gilligan:maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑ That post did not describe the end of his tour of duty on Seal Team Six. You have had that fact explained and re-explained to you repeatedly. How **** dumb are you? He has been in command during several tours of duty, and has been relieved of command at all of those by the man sent to be his successor.
That was NOT the case for ST6. In that instance, he was "relieved of duty" by a despicable naval officer who would later show himself to be a dishonest fraud, a felon, and a convicted one at that. McRaven would demonstrate that his former loser boss's opinion was inaccurate. He would show himself to be worthy of the utmost respect and responsibility by rising to the highest rank in the service.
Admit your mistake. He was not relieved of command at ST6.*Huey » 04 Nov 2024, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Focus Gilligan:
Again, was he or was he not removed from a leadership position?
I have posted NUMEROUS times how his time ST6 ended.
What it really sounds like, Trade School, is McRaven was too "institutional" and worried about his career to be effective in the type of unit Marcinko created.
I did not make a mistake. But you did. Admit your first post wasi n response to me posting he was removed from leadership was wrong. And I already told you that you are playing sematics.maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Admit your mistake. He was not relieved of command at ST6.
That was my point. I have readily admitted that convicted felon and fraud, Dick Marcinko did relieve him of his squad leader duties.
Again, was he or was he not removed from a leadership position?maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑ This post will ALWAYS be wrong when referring to McRaven's departure from ST6.
FACT.
It will always be correct when referring to McRaven's various command tours where he did ASSUME command of a military unit and then, after his assigned tour was complete, was RELIEVED OF COMMAND of that unit by his successor.... which is what I said.
FACT
...at the end of his tour of duty, by his designated successor. It happens to everyone in command.
*Huey » 04 Nov 2024, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Again, was he or was he not removed from a leadership position?
Then why was this your initial response:maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑ He was. He was relieved of his squad leader DUTIES.
He was NOT "relieved of command," which is what you said. "Relieved of command" is a very precise term in the military. It seems really odd that a supposed flyboy like you would not understand that.
...at the end of his tour of duty, by his designated successor. It happens to everyone in command.
*Huey » 04 Nov 2024, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑ maineman » Yesterday, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 3:15 pm
...at the end of his tour of duty, by his designated successor. It happens to everyone in command.
That was your first response. It was not the end of tour. In was removed in 83 he MAY have been there a year. And you are at that point agreeing he was relieved. Then he wasn't. Then you said he wasn't in command.
Your lie are documented.
Because it is true.*Huey » 04 Nov 2024, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Then why was this your initial response:
maineman » Yesterday, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 3:15 pm
...at the end of his tour of duty, by his designated successor. It happens to everyone in command.
Why was this your initial response:maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 3:52 pm » wrote: ↑ The only times McRaven was "relieved of command" were at the ends of his tours of duty as a commanding officer by his designated successor.
At ST6, he was relieved of his squad leader "duties", which is not a commanding officer position. He was transferred out of the soon-to-be-convict's ST6 to ST4 where he flourished.
...at the end of his tour of duty, by his designated successor. It happens to everyone in command.
****. Now I know you are a **** liar.maineman » 04 Nov 2024, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑ because it is true. the tour of duty I was referring to above were follow-on tours where he had a command position that he could be relieved of in the first place.
*Huey » 04 Nov 2024, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Why was this your initial response:
maineman » Yesterday, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 3:15 pm
...at the end of his tour of duty, by his designated successor. It happens to everyone in command.
shut the **** up ya chink cocksucker