Liberal Forum

Majik » 03 Nov 2024, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2024, 9:17 am

 McRaven didn't participate in any black ops beyond pulling the trigger by giving the order for the ops ....

And most of the teams couldn't stand him and certainly didn't respect him....

My classmate says otherwise.  I trust him and believe him.  You are a proven liar.  So gfy.

Blackvegetable » 03 Nov 2024, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2024, 9:30 am

According to whom?

Here is one of many....

McRaven’s delusional, dangerous national security strategy

By Robert JensenPublished in Medium · November, 2015

https://robertwjensen.org/articles/mcra ... -strategy/
 
 

maineman » 03 Nov 2024, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2024, 10:33 am

My classmate says otherwise.  I trust him and believe him.  You are a proven liar.  So gfy.

I served with that **** ....McRaven ...
He is a **** Psychopath....That destroyed the very Foundation of ethical intervention...
Prove me wrong you **** idiot....
I will wait....

 
 

Majik » 03 Nov 2024, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2024, 10:38 am

I served with that **** ....McRaven ...
He is a **** Psychopath....That destroyed the very Foundation of ethical intervention...
Prove me wrong you **** idiot....
I will wait....

My classmate also served with him and has a different opinion.

I don't need to prove your opinion is wrong.  You're free to think whatever you wish.

Now you're saying you were a Seal?  That's a first.

maineman » 03 Nov 2024, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2024, 10:33 am

My classmate says otherwise.  I trust him and believe him.  You are a proven liar.  So gfy.

 "McRaven served as assault team leader but was relieved of duty in 1983 due to McRaven's concerns about military discipline, and difficulties in keeping his sailors in line at the command. Richard Marcinko fired the 27-year-old McRaven in 1983. "He was a bright guy, but he didn't like my rude and crude way," Marcinko said. "If I was a loose cannon, he was too rigid. He took the special out of special warfare."

maineman » 03 Nov 2024, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2024, 10:52 am

My classmate also served with him and has a different opinion.

I don't need to prove your opinion is wrong.  You're free to think whatever you wish.

Now you're saying you were a Seal?  That's a first.

I'm not going to dox myself like you routinely do ....  

McRaven not only committed war crimes  but he encouraged it......
There was no line the Psychopath wouldn't cross....or would allowed to be crossed....


 
 

Majik » 03 Nov 2024, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2024, 10:33 am

Here is one of many....

McRaven’s delusional, dangerous national security strategy

By Robert JensenPublished in Medium · November, 2015

https://robertwjensen.org/articles/mcra ... -strategy/

What "team" was the author a part of?

He has focused much of his work on the critique of pornography and of masculinity, developed in his 2017 book, The End of Patriarchy: Radical Feminism for Men. He also has written about white privilege and institutional racism. He also sits on the editorial board of the academic journal Sexualization, Media, and Society.[2]


**** cornhole.
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Nov 2024, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2024, 11:14 am

What "team" was the author a part of?

He has focused much of his work on the critique of pornography and of masculinity, developed in his 2017 book, The End of Patriarchy: Radical Feminism for Men. He also has written about white privilege and institutional racism. He also sits on the editorial board of the academic journal Sexualization, Media, and Society.[2]

**** cornhole.

Are you saying his criticisms of McRaven don't have merit ?
I agree with his criticisms of McRaven ...
Even leftists get it right sometimes.....You of course being the exception ...
 

Majik » 03 Nov 2024, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2024, 11:26 am

Are you saying his criticisms of McRaven don't have merit ?
I agree with his criticisms of McRaven ...
Even leftists get it right sometimes.....You of course being the exception ...

I'm saying that you're a lying *******.

Blackvegetable » 03 Nov 2024, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2024, 11:29 am

I'm saying that you're a lying *******.

Yep, which is indicative of your low iq ....
now nod ...
 

maineman » 03 Nov 2024, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2024, 10:33 am

My classmate says otherwise.  I trust him and believe him.  You are a proven liar.  So gfy.

He was also relieved of command.

RebelGator » 02 Nov 2024, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Nov 2024, 3:10 pm

They made him an Admiral after he killed bin Laden?.......I find it hard to believe he was a high ranking officer during the raid.



 

It's all ****.

maineman » 02 Nov 2024, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Nov 2024, 3:41 pm

He wasn't ON the raid, you moron, He commanded the Seal Units that executed the evolution.  

https://www.navy.mil/DesktopModules/Art ... le=2235999

certified badass.

He is a lying psychopathic cocksucker like you.....

Judicial Watch Uncovers Email Revealing Top Pentagon Leader Ordered Destruction of bin Laden Death Photos(Washington, DC) 

– Judicial Watch announced today that on January 31, 2014, it received documents from the Department of Defense (Pentagon) revealing that within hours of its filing a May 13, 2011, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit seeking photos of the deceased Osama bin Laden, U.S. Special Operations Commander, Admiral William McRaven ordered his subordinates to “destroy” any photos they may have had “immediately.” Judicial Watch had filed a FOIA request for the photos 11 days earlier.The McRaven email, addressed to “Gentlemen,” instructs:One particular item that I want to emphasize is photos; particularly UBLs remains. At this point – all photos should have been turned over to the CIA; if you still have them destroy them immediately or get them to the [redacted]. According to the Pentagon documents, McRaven sent his email on “Friday, May 13, 2011 5:09 PM.”  The documents do not detail what documents, if any, were destroyed in response to the McRaven directive. The Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit seeking the documents was filed in the United States Court for the District of Columbia only hours earlier. Judicial Watch also announced the filing at a morning press conference.On May 2, Judicial Watch had filed a FOIA request with the Defense Department seeking “all photographs and/or video recordings of Usama (Osama) Bin Laden taken during and/or after the U.S. military operation in Pakistan on or about May 1, 2011.”  Federal law contains broad prohibitions against the “concealment, removal, or mutilation generally” of government records.

 
 

*Huey » 03 Nov 2024, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2024, 12:04 pm

He was also relieved of command.

...at the end of his tour of duty, by his designated successor.  It happens to everyone in command.

maineman » 03 Nov 2024, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2024, 3:15 pm

...at the end of his tour of duty, by his designated successor.  It happens to everyone in command.

Wrong answer:

Second time:

In 1982, as a junior officer, McRaven received assignment to SEAL Team Six in Dam Neck, Virginia under the command of CDR Richard Marcinko and completed a specialized selection and training course. McRaven served as assault team leader but was relieved of duty in 1983 due to McRaven's concerns about military discipline, and difficulties in keeping his sailors in line at the command. Richard Marcinko fired the 27-year-old McRaven in 1983. "He was a bright guy, but he didn't like my rude and crude way," Marcinko said. "If I was a loose cannon, he was too rigid. He took the special out of special warfare."[14] McRaven was transferred to another east coast based SEAL team.

*Huey » 03 Nov 2024, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2024, 3:27 pm

Wrong answer:

Second time:

In 1982, as a junior officer, McRaven received assignment to SEAL Team Six in Dam Neck, Virginia under the command of CDR Richard Marcinko and completed a specialized selection and training course. McRaven served as assault team leader but was relieved of duty in 1983 due to McRaven's concerns about military discipline, and difficulties in keeping his sailors in line at the command. Richard Marcinko fired the 27-year-old McRaven in 1983. "He was a bright guy, but he didn't like my rude and crude way," Marcinko said. "If I was a loose cannon, he was too rigid. He took the special out of special warfare."[14] McRaven was transferred to another east coast based SEAL team.

Rght answer.  The "command" in question was Seal Team Six.  An Assault team leader is not a "command."   You'd think a guy who claimed to be a ****-hot air crewman like you would know the lingo better than that.

Many senior officers in the military have, at some point in their career, found themselves working for assholes like convicted felon, ex-con Dick Marcinko only to blow by them on the lineal list by being promoted over them.  The Navy obviously didn't put too much stock in Marcinko's opinion of McRaven.  He topped out as an O-5 while McRaven went on to get four stars.

I guess I shouldn't be too surprised you would value the opinions of frauds and con artists like that.
 

maineman » 03 Nov 2024, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2024, 3:49 pm

Rght answer.  The "command" in question was Seal Team Six.  An Assault team leader is not a "command."   You'd think a guy who claimed to be a ****-hot air crewman like you would know the lingo better than that.

Many senior officers in the military find themselves working for assholes like convicted felon, ex-con Dick Marcinko only to blow by them on the lineal list by being promoted over them.  The Navy obviously didn't put too much stock in Marcinko's opinion of McRaven.  He topped out as an O-5 while McRaven went on to get four stars.

I guess I shouldn't be too surprised you would value the opinions of frauds and con artists like that.

Try again. 

McRaven served as assault team leader but was relieved of duty in 1983 due to McRaven's concerns about military discipline, and difficulties in keeping his sailors in line at the command. Richard Marcinko fired the 27-year-old McRaven in 1983.

McRaven was not the leader of the entire team.  Marcinko was.

Please get stupid and tell me I a wrong.  Please.  It won't end well for you.

*Huey » 03 Nov 2024, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2024, 12:04 pm

He was also relieved of command.

Here you say he was relieved of command.  He was not "IN command,"  therefore he could not be "relieved of command."

Do you really want to stick around this stupid argument.  Isn't that repeated proximity to the curb getting embarrassing for you, flyboy?

*Huey » 03 Nov 2024, 3:57 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2024, 3:57 pm

Try again. 

McRaven served as assault team leader but was relieved of duty in 1983 due to McRaven's concerns about military discipline, and difficulties in keeping his sailors in line at the command. Richard Marcinko fired the 27-year-old McRaven in 1983.

McRaven was not the leader of the entire team.  Marcinko was.

Please get stupid and tell me I a wrong.  Please.  It won't end well for you.

and show me where I EVER said anyone other than Marcinko was in command of Seal Team Six during this incident.

Marcinko fired McRaven.  Marcinko never advanced to another higher pay grade.  Within a decade, he was coming to attention and saluting when McRaven walked into the room.  Payback's a bitch.

maineman » 03 Nov 2024, 4:14 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2024, 4:14 pm

and show me where I EVER said anyone other than Marcinko was in command of Seal Team Six during this incident.

Marcinko fired McRaven.  Marcinko never advanced to another higher pay grade.  Within a decade, he was coming to attention and saluting when McRaven walked into the room.  Payback's a bitch.

Dude, you said something wrong and can't admit you wrong.  Now you are **** trying to lie your way out of it.  **** you Gilligan.