Liberal Forum

MR-7 » 20 Aug 2025, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2025, 8:32 am

Bringing up a post he started from 2024. This is all this Slack-Jawed MoFo has. This is to stay as "relevant" as he can.

Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2025, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2025, 8:14 am

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2024, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 3:32 pm

I know there are very literal minded people out there, so to eliminate any issues -

I am NOT talking about

"the process by which one powerful country makes a smaller neighboring country refrain from opposing the former's foreign policy rules, while allowing it to keep its nominal independence and its own political system."

though I won't cavil with a figurative comparison (for reasons soon to become apparent).

I am talking about a "Tom of Finlandization" of MAGA iconography.

Need I labor the obvious inspiration here?

Here's Tom..



Here is a COMMERCIALLY PRODUCED MAGA icon.


 
Now I don't think it requires a great deal of insight into the human psyche to discern the arc joining these two. (I'll forgo drawing the risible contrast twixt image and subject in the spirit of Christian charity)

So if you are an agonizingly closeted male, probably driving a large vehicle festooned with the symbols of your faux heterosexuality, how do you reconcile your irrational passion for a Florida Man in a fake tan with your carefully manicured public persona?

Like the object of your affections you compensate with an equally irrational, but readily stoked and quite public, alarm over "grooming" and "furries xitting in litterboxes..

 TIMELESS!
 

 

Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 1:50 pm

*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm

Your idiotic comment I destroyed.  

Now check this out.  This is like taking a black belt to a gunfight:

Off-duty cop fatally shoots man armed with BB gun after confrontation outside Staten Island diner
https://nypost.com/2025/08/15/us-news/o ... and-diner/

Post the reason why you FAVOR machine gun regulations but object to assault weapon regulation.

 

*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 3:10 pm

Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 1:50 pm

*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm

Your idiotic comment I destroyed.  

Now check this out.  This is like taking a black belt to a gunfight:

Off-duty cop fatally shoots man armed with BB gun after confrontation outside Staten Island diner
https://nypost.com/2025/08/15/us-news/o ... and-diner/

Post the reason why you FAVOR machine gun regulations but object to assault weapon regulation.

Since you refuse to specify what assault weapons you are discussing OR define what an assault weapon is I will go with this:

• Military-style features:
  Many definitions focus on cosmetic features reminiscent of military firearms, such as pistol grips, folding stocks, flash suppressors, and large-capacity magazines. 

1.  I have never said I was in FAVOR of machine gun regelations as they stand since 1986

2.  What you call an assault weapon, and all bans of such, are not based on function but on cosmetic features.  Removal of some of those features in some juridictions make them legal BUT they still have the same operation.  THey are still nothing more than a semi auto.

Acknowledge you were answered.
 

 

*Huey » 20 Aug 2025, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2025, 9:03 am

 

So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.

MR-7 » 20 Aug 2025, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2025, 9:35 am

The only thing BV has posted on here that wasn't a LIE, was when he posted that biden had been breeding Vaccine skepticism and was promoting quack cures. I vaguely remember, but I would bet he did.

Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2025, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2025, 10:12 am

In the retelling you have a measurable testosterone level.

So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2024, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 3:32 pm

I know there are very literal minded people out there, so to eliminate any issues -

I am NOT talking about

"the process by which one powerful country makes a smaller neighboring country refrain from opposing the former's foreign policy rules, while allowing it to keep its nominal independence and its own political system."

though I won't cavil with a figurative comparison (for reasons soon to become apparent).

I am talking about a "Tom of Finlandization" of MAGA iconography.

Need I labor the obvious inspiration here?

Here's Tom..



Here is a COMMERCIALLY PRODUCED MAGA icon.


 
Now I don't think it requires a great deal of insight into the human psyche to discern the arc joining these two. (I'll forgo drawing the risible contrast twixt image and subject in the spirit of Christian charity)

So if you are an agonizingly closeted male, probably driving a large vehicle festooned with the symbols of your faux heterosexuality, how do you reconcile your irrational passion for a Florida Man in a fake tan with your carefully manicured public persona?

Like the object of your affections you compensate with an equally irrational, but readily stoked and quite public, alarm over "grooming" and "furries xitting in litterboxes..

Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 7:28 am » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 7:28 am

 Grindr partnered with Rainbow Wool and designer Michael Schmidt to create a fashion show featuring clothing made entirely from the wool of gay sheep.

Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2025, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2025, 10:12 am

In the retelling you have a measurable testosterone level.

Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 7:28 am » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 7:28 am

 Grindr partnered with Rainbow Wool and designer Michael Schmidt to create a fashion show featuring clothing made entirely from the wool of gay sheep.

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2024, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 3:32 pm

I know there are very literal minded people out there, so to eliminate any issues -

I am NOT talking about

"the process by which one powerful country makes a smaller neighboring country refrain from opposing the former's foreign policy rules, while allowing it to keep its nominal independence and its own political system."

though I won't cavil with a figurative comparison (for reasons soon to become apparent).

I am talking about a "Tom of Finlandization" of MAGA iconography.

Need I labor the obvious inspiration here?

Here's Tom..



Here is a COMMERCIALLY PRODUCED MAGA icon.


 
Now I don't think it requires a great deal of insight into the human psyche to discern the arc joining these two. (I'll forgo drawing the risible contrast twixt image and subject in the spirit of Christian charity)

So if you are an agonizingly closeted male, probably driving a large vehicle festooned with the symbols of your faux heterosexuality, how do you reconcile your irrational passion for a Florida Man in a fake tan with your carefully manicured public persona?

Like the object of your affections you compensate with an equally irrational, but readily stoked and quite public, alarm over "grooming" and "furries xitting in litterboxes..

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2025, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

20 Aug 2025, 10:12 am

In the retelling you have a measurable testosterone level.

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2024, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2024, 3:32 pm

I know there are very literal minded people out there, so to eliminate any issues -

I am NOT talking about

"the process by which one powerful country makes a smaller neighboring country refrain from opposing the former's foreign policy rules, while allowing it to keep its nominal independence and its own political system."

though I won't cavil with a figurative comparison (for reasons soon to become apparent).

I am talking about a "Tom of Finlandization" of MAGA iconography.

Need I labor the obvious inspiration here?

Here's Tom..



Here is a COMMERCIALLY PRODUCED MAGA icon.


 
Now I don't think it requires a great deal of insight into the human psyche to discern the arc joining these two. (I'll forgo drawing the risible contrast twixt image and subject in the spirit of Christian charity)

So if you are an agonizingly closeted male, probably driving a large vehicle festooned with the symbols of your faux heterosexuality, how do you reconcile your irrational passion for a Florida Man in a fake tan with your carefully manicured public persona?

Like the object of your affections you compensate with an equally irrational, but readily stoked and quite public, alarm over "grooming" and "furries xitting in litterboxes..

Blackvegetable » 21 Feb 2026, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2026, 1:25 pm

Steamy....
 

RebelGator » 21 Feb 2026, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2026, 1:27 pm

Gay

Blackvegetable » 21 Feb 2026, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2026, 1:25 pm

Steamy....
 

BuckNaked » 21 Feb 2026, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2026, 2:39 pm

Are you gay?  not that there’s anything wrong with that

Blackvegetable » 21 Feb 2026, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2026, 4:16 pm

I'm not in the photo.

JohnnyYou » 21 Feb 2026, 6:00 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2026, 6:00 pm

Glad He Ate Her

youtu.be/RtXGobX3sZs?si=cIjE4PIAhnnHkGk_[DUH CUM BLOCKED BY