Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
PUTIN WINS AGAIN: KAKA...raped, gutted, gasping, left for dead
PUTIN WINS AGAIN: KAKA...raped, gutted, gasping, left for dead
By Sumela
Today 12:16 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
Oh, just STFU, and quit pretending to speak for Trump, loser.
Trump is going to settle the war in Ukraine by giving Putin all of the territory he has taken - and likely some that he has not taken. I would not be shocked to see Trump draw the line at the Dnipro River.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
NATO is how we rob Europe and make vassals of them.DeezerShoove » Today, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑ What good is NATO to the US?
Why should we US citizens fear/hate Russians?
We should fear/hate Russians because they castrate their ENEMIES, not themselves.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Trump will not settle the war in Putin's favor because there is affinity. At the level of monsters, affinities play no role. Strengths and weaknesses dictate outcomes.Mrkelly » Today, 6:07 pm » wrote: ↑ never said any of the above
just splainin how it’s gonna go for Ukraine
He will settle it in Putin's favor because there is no other way TO settle it. Conditions on the ground favor Putin, and it should go without saying that Trump's hand is constrained by conditions on the ground.
If the United States were to just "drop out," Ukraine would be no more.
If the United States were to "go all in," Putin would be royally **** for the duration of his role - and make no mistake, his role is savior of Russia on a level similar to the role that FDR played in the USA. History will agree with me that Putin was the pivotal leader of the 21st century.
Trump has it IN HIS HANDS - as feckless Biden does, fruitlessly - to settle this war very quickly. Not in 24 hours. That is just silly campaign rhetoric. But quickly. He can walk into a room with the green t-shirt and say, here is the end of the war. Agree, or you are on your own with zero support from the U.S., NATO, or any European nation that matters. The green t-shirt will have NO CHOICE but to accept it.
He can then walk into a room with Putin, show him the same plan, and say, "Here is what the green t-shirt has agreed to. This is the deal. If you take it, everything is golden. If you do not, we are all in."
Now, in the case of Putin, Trump might still have to negotiate a few small matters - but Putin is going to take that deal. Why do you think Putin has thrown more men and machines and money at the front lines in the past three months than in the past year? He understands that Trump is serious about ending the war, has the power to do so, and will be constrained in what he offers each side by conditions on the ground. So he is doing everything in his power - costs be damned - to affect conditions on the ground.
Putin was unwilling to gamble on a Cameluh victory. He HAD BEEN spending x number of lives per kilometer of land gained. The number was relatively conservative. In the three months leading up to the election, his strategy became far more frenzied and far less concerned about losses. Because he KNEW that if Trump won, an end to the war would come - and conditions on the ground would decide where the borders were drawn.
Bear in mind, Trump is also constrained. He is constrained by the fact that this conflict is an existential issue for Russia. Russia absolutely will not have NATO on its border. So Trump cannot simply dictate. But within the constraints of respecting Russia's red lines - Russia's existential concerns, - Trump's word in Ukraine will be law. Whichever side tells him to **** off suffers FAR beyond what might be gained by continuing the war.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
ConWave is not well. Never has been I suspect.Mrkelly » Today, 5:59 pm » wrote: ↑Elections have consequences
tRump hates NATO and wants it gone
tRump has a friendship with Putin that is going to say “**** you” to Ukraine
but you will think that it is a good idea once tRump says so
1. NATO is cash cow for the MIC...MIC doesn't care about the US. They care about profit and empire.DeezerShoove » Today, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑ What good is NATO to the US?
Why should we US citizens fear/hate Russians?
2. Because the Oligarchs want you to.
NATO was NEVER about protecting anyone.DeezerShoove » Today, 6:16 pm » wrote: ↑ I merely asked your opinion on two things you brought up.
US investment in NATO has been enormous over the decades. Has that org. saved us from being attacked or in conflicts? Has the cost yielded commensurate benefits? Like paying for a burglar alarm system - you don't know if the window stickers stopped the break-in or not. IMHO it's damned hard to see the benefits but easy to see the membership creep.
Personally, I do not "fear" the Russians like I'm apparently supposed to...
These are two opinions I'm not afraid of voicing, scaredy cat.
It is about controlling Europe and demonizing Russia
so that there is no alignment between them.
'Keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down'
– those were the words of Nato's first Secretary General, Lord Ismay.
Quite the optimist.Cannonpointer » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Oh, just STFU, and quit pretending to speak for Trump, loser.
Trump is going to settle the war in Ukraine by giving Putin all of the territory he has taken - and likely some that he has not taken. I would not be shocked to see Trump draw the line at the Dnipro River.
There is nothing optimistic in my assertion. Trump has promised to end the war - and he likes to keep his promises. The entire world wants this war to end, and Trump ending it will let him preen. And preening is his favorite pastime.
And most importantly, he has the power to end it. He can force the green t-shirt to accept his dictates by the threat of dropping him like a hot rock and leaving him to Putin's tender mercies. Likewise, he can threaten Putin with NATO going all in - which would be very stupid of NATO, but would also be extremely inconvenient to Putin, who is a builder, not a squanderer. And it isn't like Putin doesn't want the war to end, after all. He does - and Trump is certainly smart enough not to make ending it more painful than continuing it.
Perhaps the Dnipro is optimistic. But Trump likes clean lines. Rivers are wonderful borders.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Putin will bow to Trump?Cannonpointer » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ There is nothing optimistic in my assertion. Trump has promised to end the war - and he likes to keep his promises. The entire world wants this war to end, and Trump ending it will let him preen. And preening is his favorite pastime.
And most importantly, he has the power to end it. He can force the green t-shirt to accept his dictates by the threat of dropping him like a hot rock and leaving him to Putin's tender mercies. Likewise, he can threaten Putin with NATO going all in - which would be very stupid of NATO, but would also be extremely inconvenient to Putin, who is a builder, not a squanderer. And it isn't like Putin doesn't want the war to end, after all. He does - and Trump is certainly smart enough not to make ending it more painful than continuing it.
Perhaps the Dnipro is optimistic. But Trump likes clean lines. Rivers are wonderful borders.
Trump will tell Putin what to do?
Sorry sir...but...sound like colonialism.
"""Good lil Putie...do as I tell you"""
Maybe Putin will tell Trump what Putin will do.
Sumela » 46 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ NATO was NEVER about protecting anyone.
It is about controlling Europe and demonizing Russia
so that there is no alignment between them.
'Keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down'
– those were the words of Nato's first Secretary General, Lord Ismay.
I was taught in school that NATO was meant to prevent Soviet aggression.
So I guess that was more or less correct.
Seems that "aggression" was assumed to be innate in being born Russian.
Nothing NATO could do but defend like a ****.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
Sumela » 51 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ 1. NATO is cash cow for the MIC...MIC doesn't care about the US. They care about profit and empire.
2. Because the Oligarchs want you to.
MrKelly coulda said that. I am quite sure he would be of the same mind.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
Cannonpointer » Today, 8:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, just STFU, and quit pretending to speak for Trump, loser.
Trump is going to settle the war in Ukraine by giving Putin all of the territory he has taken - and likely some that he has not taken. I would not be shocked to see Trump draw the line at the Dnipro River.
That would suit you and Vlad, no?
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
Yes. Vlad never wanted this war to start. Now he wants it to end. He is a builder. Not a squanderer. He wants to build up Russia - not tear down Ukraine.
This war was forced onto Russia. Everyone with any understanding of global politics knows this. And they know why. Because NATO is just a money grabbing scheme for Blackrock.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
He is. As am I.DeezerShoove » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ MrKelly coulda said that. I am quite sure he would be of the same mind.
What do YOU think the purpose of NATO is? Protecting democracy?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
I guess he could have and he prolly would concur.DeezerShoove » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ MrKelly coulda said that. I am quite sure he would be of the same mind.
But, answering questions on here is quite often
a fools errand into an "I GOTCHA" trap.
Those same schools are now teaching that many girls have penises.DeezerShoove » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I was taught in school that NATO was meant to prevent Soviet aggression.
You might want to rethink whatever you learned from those sources.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Not sure what Soviet aggression is.DeezerShoove » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I was taught in school that NATO was meant to prevent Soviet aggression.
So I guess that was more or less correct.
Seems that "aggression" was assumed to be innate in being born Russian.
Nothing NATO could do but defend like a ****.
Sounds like a cliche of some kind...jingoism.
Even a monkey can hurt you, if he has a monkey wrench.Sumela » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Putin will bow to Trump?
Trump will tell Putin what to do?
Sorry sir...but...sound like colonialism.
"""Good lil Putie...do as I tell you"""
Maybe Putin will tell Trump what Putin will do.
The U.S. is ABSOLUTELY a colonial power. It has 32 vassals in Europe alone. It has a record of involving itself in disastrous and retarded conflicts. Avoiding a knock-down, drag-out with a retard does not make one a coward or a vasal. I never suggested that Trump could make Putin accept any redline-crossing ****. I merely said that Trump can make Putin an offer he doesn't refuse. Indeed, I EXPRESSLY stated that Trump will end the war on conditions favorable to Putin.
Putin doesn't run on pride - he runs on intelligence and cunning. All Trump has to do, if he wants to sway Vlad this way or that, is convince Vlad that there is more pain for Russia in this course of action than there is in that course of action.
Let me put it to you this way: The deep state forced Putin into this war. Since they made him fight a war he did not want to fight, are YOU saying that makes Putin our bitch? They DID force his hand, did they not? And if Nigbama's deep state can force Putin's hand, without Putin being our bitch, what makes you suppose that Trump cannot? And in the scenario that I describe, Putin gets what he wants: an end to the hostilities on terms that he can live with.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
I think it was a reaction to fears after WWII and those fears were displaced with a cold war detent.Cannonpointer » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ He is. As am I.
What do YOU think the purpose of NATO is? Protecting democracy?
Which was a "permanent" madness on both sides.
NATO became useful in that cold war and kept it semi-relevant as a so-called defensive/deterrent org.
Expansion of that org. wasn't supposed to be in the cards but it came anyway.
So, Russia got whipsawed by China on one side and Nato on the other while the Soviet structure grew thin.
Whatever they claimed at the start of NATO has long been displaced.
Are they protecting democracy? Hardly. Seems like they want to be big enough to be invincible, though.
Advancing on a sworn enemy over time. Pissing people off.
The more countries they can claim as members,
the more opportunities they can claim they got their noses bent out of shape.
When Peru joins I'm going to start to wonder...
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
When I asked its purpose, I asked in the present tense. This is not to agree with your history, but to say that the history isn not worth arguing about in the present. In MY view of NATO's history, it was always intended to make vassals of Europe's nations.DeezerShoove » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I think it was a reaction to fears after WWII and those fears were displaced with a cold war detent.
Which was a "permanent" madness on both sides.
NATO became useful in that cold war and kept it semi-relevant as a so-called defensive/deterrent org.
Expansion of that org. wasn't supposed to be in the cards but it came anyway.
Every nation that joins NATO must immediately gear up, as a condition of membership, to NATO's military standards.DeezerShoove » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ So, Russia got whipsawed by China on one side and Nato on the other while the Soviet structure grew thin.
Whatever they claimed at the start of NATO has long been displaced.
Are they protecting democracy? Hardly. Seems like they want to be big enough to be invincible, though.
The more countries they can claim as members,
the more opportunities they can claim they got their noses bent out of shape.
When Peru joins I'm going to start to wonder...
That means buying a ton of weapons from America's MIC. Which is owned by blackrock.
Follow the money.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Who is online
In total there are 1917 users online :: 10 registered, 12 bots, and 1895 guests
Registered users: righteous, ROG62, GHETTO BLASTER, jerra b, murdock, LowIQTrash, Sumela, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, crimsongulf
Bots: YandexBot, Not, app.hypefactors.com, proximic, ADmantX, Applebot, semantic-visions.com, Mediapartners-Google, linkfluence.com, curl/7, bingbot, Googlebot