This isn't worth reading because you have no idea what you are talking about.Zeets2 » 08 Nov 2024, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ This was a perfect example of the lawfare **** that Biden had thrown at Trump, because it didn't give Trump the opportunity to prove himself innocent since the accuser could not (and was not even required to) point with any certainty as to the date and time of the alleged "attack". Nor was there a single eye-witness put forth despite the fact that the attack allegedly came in the fitting room at a busy retail store. Had she provided that, Trump could have proven he was elsewhere on that date making the accusation and the victim completely unreliable and worthless to prove anything.
But liberal assholes like you didn't really give a **** about the truth as long as you thought you could win the election if only Trump were discredited and thrown in jail.
And at that, you incompetent idiots failed royally!!!
You never do bitchBlackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑ This isn't worth reading because you have no idea what you are talking about.
Again.
Pure genius coming from our residing liberal imbecile.Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑ This isn't worth reading because you have no idea what you are talking about.
Again.
Zeet,Zeets2 » 08 Nov 2024, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ Pure genius coming from our residing liberal imbecile.
Refuse to read a post, but claim it must be wrong anyway.
And you wonder why you're such a loser!???!![]()
That's all you've got? Irrelevant ****?Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑ Zeet,
It is really simple.
It always is.
Name the attorney in question.
See how little effort it required to expose you as a leaking whoopie cushion?Zeets2 » 08 Nov 2024, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑ That's all you've got? Irrelevant ****?
Go find him yourself, dickhead! YOU'RE the errand boy here!
Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ See how little effort it required to expose you as a leaking whoopie cushion?
How does refusing to answer irrelevant and idiotic questions expose anything when stupidity comes from the likes of a loser like you?Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ See how little effort it required to expose you as a leaking whoopie cushion?
You can't.Zeets2 » 08 Nov 2024, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑ How does refusing to answer irrelevant and idiotic questions expose anything when stupidity comes from the likes of a loser like you?
You know damn well that I don't play your stupid games, and yet you continue down the path of proven failure.
Just like Biden and Kamaltoe!
Can you explain what's SO relevant about the name of an AG who prosecuted Trump and is now about to have his entire case dismissed?Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑ You can't.
And you have no idea what's relevant.
Because you're a moron.
This is how completely clueless you are.Zeets2 » 08 Nov 2024, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑ Can you explain what's SO relevant about the name of an AG who prosecuted Trump and is now about to have his entire case dismissed?
Go don your ****** hat and cry in your beer elsewhere, snowflake!![]()
Here, we need to do nothing but laugh in your dumb face and celebrate the the return of the greatest President of this century!
So why can't you explain the relevance, you imbecile?Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑ This is how completely clueless you are.
This isn't about the SPECIAL COUNSEL, idiot...it is about GRIFTY'S ATTORNEY.
You are spectacularly ignorant, Zeet.
That's all you've got? Irrelevant ****?Zeets2 » 08 Nov 2024, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑ So why can't you explain the relevance, you imbecile?
What could it possibly matter who an attorney is on a case that's about to be dismissed?
IT'S OVER DICKHEAD!!!!
Or are you still convinced they'll succeed and Trump will be thrown in jail, you ignorant asshole?
So sit on this, loser!:
So you can't explain the relevance of your idiotic comment, just like I said, huh?Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑ That's all you've got? Irrelevant ****?
Go find him yourself, dickhead! YOU'RE the errand boy here!
Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑ Why do you continue to post?
You're a **** idiot.
You don't know anything about either fact.
To contradict his own attorney Grifty would have to testify, under oath.
Grifty doesn't do that.
They're not allegations, it is SWORN TESTIMONY....better yet, Grifty's client/attorney privilege is voided.
Don't go on twitching, just shut the **** up and lay there as an example to others.
Fondler,*Beekeeper » 09 Nov 2024, 5:35 am » wrote: ↑ It's NOT admitted in a COURT OF LAW as DIRECT TESTIMONY, ergo, it's still ****!!
Better check your CONSTITUTION to see that until a TRIAL HAPPENS, you got JACK **** as does JACK **** SMITH!!
Better luck next time. How was that HOSPITAL ER VISIT??
I don't give 2 **** if it was F. Lee Bailey, IT WAS NEVER HEARD IN ANY COURT OF LAW, HAS NEVER BEEN SUBJECT TO CROSS EXAMINATION, AND THEREFORE IS NOT ADMITTED EVIDENCE OF ANYTHING. Right now, it's only **** you think has some foundation in proving some MOOT POINT you think you can make!!
I know relevant, and you aren't relevant.....Junior.Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑ You can't.
And you have no idea what's relevant.
Because you're a moron.
You don't know a **** thing..*Beekeeper » 09 Nov 2024, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑ I don't give 2 **** if it was F. Lee Bailey, IT WAS NEVER HEARD IN ANY COURT OF LAW, HAS NEVER BEEN SUBJECT TO CROSS EXAMINATION, AND THEREFORE IS NOT ADMITTED EVIDENCE OF ANYTHING. Right now, it's only **** you think has some foundation in proving some MOOT POINT you think you can make!!
Suck on it BUTTERCUP. Face it, YOU AND YOUR NASTY ILK GOT CURB STOMPED ON TUESDAY. Sadly, you can't seem to accept that REALITY and want to pick fights YOU WILL NEVER WIN since you are a **** **** and RUN LIKE THE ****** YOU ARE!!