Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
"It's Not That We Hate...It's Because, You Know, They're Criminals."
"It's Not That We Hate...It's Because, You Know, They're Criminals."
By Blackvegetable
8 Nov 2024 5:47 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
8 Nov 2024 11:24 am
No, he isn't.ConsRule » 08 Nov 2024, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Because he is simply stating his opinion, which went against the laws of NY and were in direct contradiction with the actual findings of the jury in the trial.
Why is it you aren't adult and mature enough to admit that? There is no disgrace in acknowledging something that is fact.
Stop yapping the same uninformed **** over and over, Pilgrim.
WHY did the judge clarify?
8 Nov 2024 11:25 am
Stop yapping and answer the question.*Huey » 08 Nov 2024, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑ I mean show where i said "2020" is irrelevant. Are you stupid? As matter of fact, I argued that because Harris was running in both races it was very relevant.
8 Nov 2024 11:26 am
The date of the article is the same as the date written on the stamp that is in the upper right corner of the verdict form...5/9/2023. If you actually looked at the link, you would have known that and wouldn't ask another stupid *** question.Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Post the date of your article.
Post the date of my citation.
Don't oblige me to put that in question form.
The date of your citation is completely irrelevant has it has no bearing under law...just as I said.
8 Nov 2024 11:27 am
I don't care about your uninformed opinion, just stipulate to the fact.ConsRule » 08 Nov 2024, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑ The date of the article is the same as the date written on the stamp that is in the upper right corner of the verdict form...5/9/2023. If you actually looked at the link, you would have known that and wouldn't ask another stupid *** question.
The date of your citation is completely irrelevant has it has no bearing under law...just as I said.
8 Nov 2024 11:28 am
When you publicly acknowledge the actual jury verdict and admit they DID NOT FIND HIM GUILTY OF RAPE, I will answer more questions from you on the subject.Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑ No, he isn't.
Stop yapping the same uninformed **** over and over, Pilgrim.
WHY did the judge clarify?
8 Nov 2024 11:30 am
The fact is clearly stated on the jury form. I have repeatedly stipulated to their finding on fact. The judges comments were his opinion and not based on NY law at the time of the incident, trial, verdict and article.Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't care about your uninformed opinion, just stipulate to the fact.
8 Nov 2024 11:30 am
Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Why would he be out to "get Trump"?
Why the **** would you believe a felon over a working man?
Because Trump is ultimately responsible for everything that goes on at his project.
Get a clue.
8 Nov 2024 12:13 pm
This isn't about me.ConsRule » 08 Nov 2024, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑ When you publicly acknowledge the actual jury verdict and admit they DID NOT FIND HIM GUILTY OF RAPE, I will answer more questions from you on the subject.
It's about facts that you are either too dim, or dishonest, to acknowledge.
8 Nov 2024 12:15 pm
He is.GHETTOBLASTER » 08 Nov 2024, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Because Trump is ultimately responsible for everything that goes on at his project.
Get a clue.
He says he is.
You insist he isn't.
I bet your life in that closet has been a real struggle.
8 Nov 2024 12:16 pm
Post the date of my citation.ConsRule » 08 Nov 2024, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑ The fact is clearly stated on the jury form. I have repeatedly stipulated to their finding on fact. The judges comments were his opinion and not based on NY law at the time of the incident, trial, verdict and article.
8 Nov 2024 12:19 pm
I'm responsible for the damage that every single tree on my land that I've never laid eyes on could cause too.Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑ He is.
He says he is.
You insist he isn't.
I bet your life in that closet has been a real struggle.
Get a clue apartment dweller...
8 Nov 2024 12:32 pm
You posted opinion. The jury verdict is the fact....nothing else.Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑ This isn't about me.
It's about facts that you are either too dim, or dishonest, to acknowledge.
As I said, you are not adult or mature enough to accept and acknowledge the jury verdict.
8 Nov 2024 12:39 pm
I'm accepting the presiding judge's opinion, not yours.ConsRule » 08 Nov 2024, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑ You posted opinion. The jury verdict is the fact....nothing else.
As I said, you are not adult or mature enough to accept and acknowledge the jury verdict.
I can tell you why you are wrong but it requires that you acknowledge and accept certain indisputable facts.
Your persistence in refusing to do so makes any exchange with you a complete waste of my time.
8 Nov 2024 12:52 pm
Coming from someone that can't define the term woman....pricelessBlackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm accepting the presiding judge's opinion, not yours.
I can tell you why you are wrong but it requires that you acknowledge and accept certain indisputable facts.
Your persistence in refusing to do so makes any exchange with you a complete waste of my time.
The opinion has no legal authority. I challenge you to provide a link to the official ruling o fany type court, in any jurisdiction in any county on earth where the verdict finds Trump guilty of rape. That is fact...links to articles where people (even those of people involved in the trial) say something different than the official verdict are not fact.Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm accepting the presiding judge's opinion, not yours.
I can tell you why you are wrong but it requires that you acknowledge and accept certain indisputable facts.
Your persistence in refusing to do so makes any exchange with you a complete waste of my time.
I realize you will not do this. You will probably come up with some whiny *** liberal reason not to do so. It will just be more proof that you are not, in the least, interested in fact and only focus on partisan liberal talking points, deflection and personal attack.
ConsRule » 08 Nov 2024, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑ The opinion has no legal authority. I challenge you to provide a link to the official ruling o fany type court, in any jurisdiction in any county on earth where the verdict finds Trump guilty of rape. That is fact...links to articles where people (even those of people involved in the trial) say something different than the official verdict are not fact.
I realize you will not do this. You will probably come up with some whiny *** liberal reason not to do so. It will just be more proof that you are not, in the least, interested in fact and only focus on partisan liberal talking points, deflection and personal attack.
You are wrong.The opinion has no legal authority
And it is easy to demonstrate.
With apologies to that pillar of wisdom Jenny from Forrest Gump; "Run, Blackvegetable, Run!"Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑
Your persistence in refusing to do so makes any exchange with you a complete waste of my time.
Then demonstrate it. Post a link to the official verdict from any type court, in any jurisdiction in any country on earth that rules Trump guilty of rape.
Not only are you completely, and demonstrably, wrong, but the entire matter of the judge's clarification is another monument to the staggering stupidity of Grifty...ConsRule » 08 Nov 2024, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑ The opinion has no legal authority. I challenge you to provide a link to the official ruling o fany type court, in any jurisdiction in any county on earth where the verdict finds Trump guilty of rape. That is fact...links to articles where people (even those of people involved in the trial) say something different than the official verdict are not fact.
I realize you will not do this. You will probably come up with some whiny *** liberal reason not to do so. It will just be more proof that you are not, in the least, interested in fact and only focus on partisan liberal talking points, deflection and personal attack.
As a bonus, I will explain how, once we're done.
Stop directing and acknowledge the facts as related in the citation.ConsRule » 08 Nov 2024, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Then demonstrate it. Post a link to the official verdict from any type court, in any jurisdiction in any country on earth that rules Trump guilty of rape.
Why did the judge offer the statement in question?
Who is online
In total there are 4285 users online :: 10 registered, 19 bots, and 4256 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Squatchman, ROG62, RebelGator, MR-7, Beekeeper, johnedgarslowhorses, Deezer Shoove, sole
Bots: DuckDuckGo, Bolt, Firefox/7.0, Not, facebookexternalhit, CriteoBot, proximic, ADmantX, Adsbot, Kinza, Yahoo! Slurp, NING, Baiduspider, YandexBot, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, bingbot, Googlebot