I don't **** care why the judge offered the statement. His opinion is irrelevant when we have the finding of fact by the jury., Keep in mind, even with the much lower preponderance of evidence standard they still ruled he did not rape her. That is all that matters. The fact millions of liberals cannot accept that was proven to be immaterial on 11/5/2024.Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Stop directing and acknowledge the facts as related in the citation.
Why did the judge offer the statement in question?
Not with links to fact. You'll only use opinion. If you have the courage to do that much.Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Not only are you completely, and demonstrably, wrong, but the entire matter of the judge's clarification is another monument to the staggering stupidity of Grifty...
As a bonus, I will explain how, once we're done.
No, you do because you have borne false witness with respect to it, Pilgrim.ConsRule » 08 Nov 2024, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't **** care why the judge offered the statement. His opinion is irrelevant when we have the finding of fact by the jury., Keep in mind, even with the much lower preponderance of evidence standard they still ruled he did not rape her. That is all that matters. The fact millions of liberals cannot accept that was proven to be immaterial on 11/5/2024.
No...Just do your part....ConsRule » 08 Nov 2024, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Not with links to fact. You'll only use opinion. If you have the courage to do that much.
I've already told you, until you provide a link to an actual court ruling that shows Trump found guilty of rape I will not answer any further questions.
You are ONLY being asked to stipulate to facts...ConsRule » 08 Nov 2024, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑ With apologies to that pillar of wisdom Jenny from Forrest Gump; "Run, Blackvegetable, Run!"
Make your point. Here is mine:
I've posted the link to the facts, and my stipulation accepting them, multiple times. It's not my fault you are too immature to accept the facts.Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑ You are ONLY being asked to stipulate to facts...
And you won't.
No..I'm not confused....you are....you made up a story...ConsRule » 08 Nov 2024, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑ I've already told you, until you provide a link to an actual court ruling that shows Trump found guilty of rape I will not answer any further questions.
I have.link to an actual court ruling
Then tell me why the judge issued that statement.ConsRule » 08 Nov 2024, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑ I've posted the link to the facts, and my stipulation accepting them, multiple times. It's not my fault you are too immature to accept the facts.
You're not in a position to bargain.ConsRule » 08 Nov 2024, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑ I've already told you, until you provide a link to an actual court ruling that shows Trump found guilty of rape I will not answer any further questions.
**** YOUBlackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑ You're not in a position to bargain.
You have offered no evidence to support your claims about the Judge's statement. You've lied about it.
Don't run from your statement.*Huey » 08 Nov 2024, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Make your point. Here is mine:
I did not say 2020 is irrelevant. Stop lying. You show where I said this:
2020is irrelevant or not relevant and I will take a week off. Like I said, if I said that you would have posted it by know. Askholio, this is not a court room. You are not a lion. Question time is over.
I am not running from my statement. I accept you surrender. I did not say what you claim or you would have posted it by now.Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't run from your statement.
Explain it....without any "wiggle room".....you know how you hate "ambiguity"...
Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't run from your statement.
Explain it....without any "wiggle room".....you know how you hate "ambiguity"...
Then what DID you mean?*Huey » 08 Nov 2024, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ I am not running from my statement. I accept you surrender. I did not say what you claim or you would have posted it by now.
You are busted in another lie.
Not even close...but you're the typical liberal hack who believes opinion over fact.Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑ No..I'm not confused....you are....you made up a story...
I have.
Until you post a link to an official trial verdict, I don't need to do anything further as I have posted a link to the official jury verdict. Since you are so incredibly stupid and immature, here is the link again.Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑ You're not in a position to bargain.
You have offered no evidence to support your claims about the Judge's statement. You've lied about it.
ConsRule » 08 Nov 2024, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Not even close...but you're the typical liberal hack who believes opinion over fact.
You're a world class lying asshole.The judge in the Trump case put his definition, which went against NY law at the time of the offense and his comment, did so as an opinion in an news article.