Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
"It's Not That We Hate...It's Because, You Know, They're Criminals."
"It's Not That We Hate...It's Because, You Know, They're Criminals."
By Blackvegetable
8 Nov 2024 5:47 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
There are no conditions attendant to you acknowledging objective facts.ConsRule » 08 Nov 2024, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Until you post a link to an official trial verdict, I don't need to do anything further as I have posted a link to the official jury verdict. Since you are so incredibly stupid and immature, here is the link again.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/0 ... l-00096059
Notice the jury's answer to the very first question.
ConsRule » 08 Nov 2024, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Until you post a link to an official trial verdict, I don't need to do anything further as I have posted a link to the official jury verdict. Since you are so incredibly stupid and immature, here is the link again.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/0 ... l-00096059
Notice the jury's answer to the very first question.
Post the date of my citation.Since you are so incredibly stupid and immature, here is the link again.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/0 ... l-00096059
No answers until you provide a link to an official trial verdict showing Trump guilty of rape.Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑ You're a world class lying asshole.
Where did he do so and why?
No further response from me will happen until said link is provided.
You lied.ConsRule » 08 Nov 2024, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑ No answers until you provide a link to an official trial verdict showing Trump guilty of rape.
No further response from me will happen until said link is provided.
You're wrong.
Just post the words Princess Askholio. I have o **** clue what has your pantyhose in a wad. Post the comment, in full, with the link.
It is quite obvious you got curb stomped again. So bad you may need to go to the hospital to get that head wound stitched up.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.ConsRule » 08 Nov 2024, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑ No answers until you provide a link to an official trial verdict showing Trump guilty of rape.
No further response from me will happen until said link is provided.
He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
done.
Again.
ProjectoLad,*Huey » 08 Nov 2024, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Just post the words Princess Askholio. I have o **** clue what has your pantyhose in a wad. Post the comment, in full, with the link.
It is quite obvious you got curb stomped again. So bad you may need to go to the hospital to get that head wound stitched up.
Resolve the ambiguity or take the L.
You lose daily bitch
That is not from an official court finding. It also goes against the laws of NY at the time of the incident and the trial. Still waiting on a LINK to an official court ruling showing him guilty of rape.Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑ “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
done.
Again.
You have your head so for up your liberal *** it's pathetic.
It very much is.ConsRule » 08 Nov 2024, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑ That is not from an official court finding. It also goes against the laws of NY at the time of the incident and the trial. Still waiting on a LINK to an official court ruling showing him guilty of rape.
You have your head so for up your liberal *** it's pathetic.
As made very clear in my citation.
It is remarkable that you persist with that idiocy.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .212.0.pdfConsRule » 08 Nov 2024, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑ That is not from an official court finding. It also goes against the laws of NY at the time of the incident and the trial. Still waiting on a LINK to an official court ruling showing him guilty of rape.
You have your head so for up your liberal *** it's pathetic.
I have no clue what the **** you are about. Start posting the comments that are specific to what I am supposed to take an L over. I might be back today. I might not.
But the challenge still stands. And since you can't post where I said 2020 was not relevant, you take the L. .
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
That would be a 4th time.*Huey » 08 Nov 2024, 5:48 pm » wrote: ↑ I have no clue what the **** you are about. Start posting the comments that are specific to what I am supposed to take an L over. I might be back today. I might not.
But the challenge still stands. And since you can't post where I said 2020 was not relevant, you take the L. .
There is no challenge...only your vagueness and projection.
Again.
brown, post his conviction...Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Somehow, JuCo, very simple concepts fly way over your head.
not a concept, brown...reality...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..." From YOUR LINK (Page 3)
The jury’s unanimous verdict in Carroll II was almost entirely in favor of Ms. Carroll. The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr. Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law
Keep in mind, she only needed to prove that with a preponderance of the evidence.
Was your narrative false?ConsRule » 08 Nov 2024, 6:33 pm » wrote: ↑ From YOUR LINK (Page 3)
The jury’s unanimous verdict in Carroll II was almost entirely in favor of Ms. Carroll. The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr. Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law
Keep in mind, she only needed to prove that with a preponderance of the evidence.
He is factually incorrect...as stated on page three of your link and with their answer to the first question on their verdict form that can be seen in the link below.Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑ “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
done.
Again.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/0 ... l-00096059
It was a Civil case, JuCo..ROG62 » 08 Nov 2024, 6:22 pm » wrote: ↑ brown, post his conviction...
not a concept, brown...reality...
Can we stop now?
Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 7:22 am » wrote: ↑ Yes...
And another judge has defined Grifty as a rapist..
He's another leftist America hating cocksucker like you.
I didn't provide a narrative...I posted a link to support my factual statement. Of course, you're too immature to accept their verdict,
Who is online
In total there are 5106 users online :: 18 registered, 18 bots, and 5070 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Zeets2, Squatchman, Buffalo, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, FJB, MR-7, Beekeeper, johnedgarslowhorses, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, sole, Huey, Fuelman
Bots: Adsbot, Kinza, CriteoBot, Yahoo! Slurp, SiteLockSpider, DuckDuckGo, proximic, DuckDuckBot, Firefox/7.0, ADmantX, NING, YandexBot, Baiduspider, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, Applebot, bingbot, curl/7