Did you cast a 3rd vote for a guy you insist should be "executed" for employing illegals?GHETTOBLASTER » 08 Nov 2024, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑ The hypocrites were those who freaked out when a bus load of Illegal Aliens arrived on their door steps at Martha's Vineyard.
Make your point, Princess.I did read the OP. I did not see Trumpmentioned. Also, please try reading my ENTIRE post.
Then get back to me.
So these are NOT your words?So this really isn't about the immigration law. It is about how you can whine about Trump
We both know why you don't answer questions, Tiny..Make your point, Princess.
Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑ So these are NOT your words?
We both know why you don't answer questions, Tiny..
I am not doing partial quotes with you.I did read the OP. I did not see Trumpmentioned. Also, please try reading my ENTIRE post.
Then get back to me.
You gonna run from the slogany thing, so I'll just point out that you are rationalizing the election of a felon and moron judged "worse than Buchanan" TWICE.*Huey » 08 Nov 2024, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑ I have nothing to run from.
You voted for the guy who got his *** handed to him in a debate, to the point that his party convinced him to drop out. You than voted for a women who just got her *** handed to her in the general. By the same buy whom you dubbed worse than Buchanan.
He is going to end up with over 300 electoral votes. If he wins both NV and AZ he will have 312. He also has a mandate with the popular vote. Harris was Trump's best asset.
**** you and your petty ****....Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑ You just cast a 3rd vote for a guy who broke the laws duly enacted by the State of New York...
Why would you give a ****?
MultipleStands,*Huey » 08 Nov 2024, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑ If those words are in my quote they are my words.
See?
I am not doing partial quotes with you.
Those words are part of a post I entered.
Make your point. And so far I am correct. You don't give a rat's *** about the immigration issue in the OP, which I commented on.
**** your demented crap.Majik » 08 Nov 2024, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑ **** you and your petty ****....
They as in the politically corrupt NY AG office had to dig **** deep to find a law that was never **** used in this manner before....
To try and stop Trump and MAGA...
They were **** charges to begin with .....
and now James is **** because there will be retribution.....against all of those progressives and their lawfare....
I know it sucks that you lost the 2nd American revolution.....that was fought not with guns and bullets but digitally....
but you did ....
And now America is once again free .....
Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑ You gonna run from the slogany thing, so I'll just point out that you are rationalizing the election of a felon and moron judged "worse than Buchanan" TWICE.
Now proceed with your slogans and feefees.
Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑ MultipleStands,
If you're gonna run from your words, don't spew them.
No..I posted facts.*Huey » 08 Nov 2024, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑ I already mentioned the worse than Buchannan slogan when I posted facts. You are an empty suit. You got nothing but slogans.
Try reading an entire post, Princess. You are right. Yo don't cherry pick. You just fail to read.Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑ MultipleStands,
If you're gonna run from your words, don't spew them.
You voted for the guy who got his *** handed to him in a debate, to the point that his party convinced him to drop out. You than voted for a women who just got her *** handed to her in the general. By the same buy whom you dubbed worse than Buchanan. He is going to end up with over 300 electoral votes. If he wins both NV and AZ he will have 312. He also has a mandate with the popular vote. Harris was Trump's best asset.
Are these your words?*Huey » 08 Nov 2024, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑ So we are not going to discuss the judges decision in the OP? Why bother starting all these threads if you are just going to post your slogans about trump?
Remember, only congress can write laws.
Your Special Gift, Sheilagh, is your incapacity to understand.I did read the OP. I did not see Trumpmentioned
He had no idea that he was hiring illegal aliensBlackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑ Did you cast a 3rd vote for a guy you insist should be "executed" for employing illegals?
Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑ Are these your words?
Your Special Gift, Sheilagh, is your incapacity to understand.
You really are one dumb ****.GHETTOBLASTER » 08 Nov 2024, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑ He had no idea that he was hiring illegal aliens
Work credentials in NYC for the big projects are heavily monitored and have always been that way.
Trump was obviously taken by surprise once he realized what the situation was
In your magic fairy world Trump was willing to risk massive fines and default on project deadlines by trying to save a few bucks on Illegal scab labor.
The bigger the job, the more you will find COMPLIANCE OFFICERS crawling every inch of it on a daily basis.
No...you desperately need to work at your relationship with the Obvious.*Huey » 08 Nov 2024, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑ If my name was on the quote than of course they are. Just make your point. And avoid discussing your OP, Princess.
Nothing more hypocritical than a lying leftist *** *** like you.Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑ A federal judge in Texas on Thursday struck down a new Biden administration program that sought to provide a path to U.S. citizenship for hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants married to American citizens.
The ruling, issued by Judge J. Campbell Barker of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, came months after 16 Republican-led states, led by Texas’ attorney general, Ken Paxton, filed a lawsuit claiming that the administration lacked the legal authority to enact the program. In August, Judge Barker temporarily blocked the initiative, just days after it had gone into place.
The Biden administration started the initiative, known as Keeping Families Together, in August, allowing undocumented immigrants who were married to U.S. citizens and had been in the United States for 10 years or more a chance to gain a green card without leaving the country.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/07/us/b ... ogram.html
Here we have an effort, led by an AG under indictment, toiling on behalf of a felon, operating under a banner of Law&Order.
It's about upholding the law, of course.
How **** and petty can hypocrites get?
Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑ You really are one dumb ****.
You spent the entire night dreaming up this rationalization after having been fed your dumb ****.
OF COURSE HE KNEW THEY WERE ILLEGALS....IT IS WHY HE HIRED THEM INSTEAD OF UNION MEMBERS.
**** cretin.