Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 09 Nov 2024, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2024, 8:13 am

The filing from Judge Lewis A. Kaplan came as Trump’s attorneys have sought a new trial and have argued that the jury’s $5 million verdict against Trump in the civil suit was excessive.

Can you see it now?

You can't see worth a ****.  Apparently you didn't actually read the filing you linked.

Again...from page 3 in YOUR LINK!

The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr. Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law

Doesn't it suck when the law gets in the way of your whiny *** liberal spin?
 

Blackvegetable » 09 Nov 2024, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2024, 8:35 am

So why are crackers always getting caught in cars being **** by black trannies?

Is that the kind of porn you watch? Because nobody here has a **** clue what you are talking about. 

ConsRule » 09 Nov 2024, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2024, 8:31 am

He still lied about the jury verdict.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/0 ... l-00096059

One step at a time, lying piece of ****.

Must I explain what that excerpt means?

For the record, you've demanded two pieces of evidence you don't have the integrity to read.

Which megachurch, Pilgrim?
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 5:54 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2024, 5:54 pm

That would be a 4th time.

There is no challenge...only your vagueness and projection.

Again.

I accept your surrender, Princess.  Here is your L.

*Huey » 09 Nov 2024, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2024, 9:00 am

I accept your surrender, Princess.  Here is your L.

you'll need to stop running, miss.

BV is a **** loser.

Blackvegetable » 09 Nov 2024, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2024, 9:02 am

you'll need to stop running, miss.

I’m at a stand still waiting for you to post where I said 2020 was irrelevant even though I post why 2020 was relevant despite your lies.

I **** own you, Princess.  

*Huey » 09 Nov 2024, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2024, 9:13 am

I’m at a stand still waiting for you to post where I said 2020 was irrelevant even though I post why 2020 was relevant despite your lies.

I **** own you, Princess.

We are waiting for you to stop running and explain what you meant if not "irrelevant"..

Would you like to eat some of your words on "ambiguity" and assbiting?

Blackvegetable » 09 Nov 2024, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2024, 9:22 am

We are waiting for you to stop running and explain what you meant if not "irrelevant"..

Would you like to eat some of your words on "ambiguity" and assbiting?

Post what comment you are talking about and I promise To answer.  If you don’t, I accept your surrender.

*Huey » 09 Nov 2024, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2024, 9:25 am

Post what comment you are talking about and I promise To answer.  If you don’t, I accept your surrender.

Not a 4th time, Tiny...


You have very strict rules about that.

Of course, if you want to confess that your rule doesn't apply to you....


 

Blackvegetable » 09 Nov 2024, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2024, 9:29 am

Not a 4th time, Tiny...

You have very strict rules about that.

Of course, if you want to confess that your rule doesn't apply to you....

You surrender is accepted and. chalk this up to you being a ******.

If I said 2020 was irrelevant, ******, you would have reposted it by now.  

Don't know what rule you are talking about, Princess.

*Huey » 09 Nov 2024, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2024, 9:41 am

You surrender is accepted and. chalk this up to you being a ******.

If I said 2020 was irrelevant, ******, you would have reposted it by now.  

Don't know what rule you are talking about, Princess.

It's different for girls, then.


 

Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2024, 6:47 am

A federal judge in Texas on Thursday struck down a new Biden administration program that sought to provide a path to U.S. citizenship for hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants married to American citizens.

 The ruling, issued by Judge J. Campbell Barker of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, came months after 16 Republican-led states, led by Texas’ attorney general, Ken Paxton, filed a lawsuit claiming that the administration lacked the legal authority to enact the program. In August, Judge Barker temporarily blocked the initiative, just days after it had gone into place.

The Biden administration started the initiative, known as Keeping Families Together, in August, allowing undocumented immigrants who were married to U.S. citizens and had been in the United States for 10 years or more a chance to gain a green card without leaving the country.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/07/us/b ... ogram.html

Here we have an effort, led by an AG under indictment, toiling on behalf of a felon, operating under a banner of Law&Order.

It's about upholding the law, of course.

How **** and petty can hypocrites get?

You keep babbling about a Corrupt Judicial System under the Biden Crime Organization. 
Nothing they’ve proposed was ever legal. Now it’s time there **** gets buried for good 
  Did the Jew Cocksucker ever show compassion and bring them in his home? Of course not

Blackvegetable » 09 Nov 2024, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2024, 9:47 am

It's different for girls, then.

It is over.  You lost.  Move on, little man.

Blackvegetable » 09 Nov 2024, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2024, 8:38 am

One step at a time, lying piece of ****.

Must I explain what that excerpt means?

For the record, you've demanded two pieces of evidence you don't have the integrity to read.

Which megachurch, Pilgrim?

You *******.  The link to the Kaplan filing you are so proud of posting clearly states that Carroll did not prevail at proving Trump committed rape.  You are arguing against your own post.

Are all liberals as **** stupid as you?  No need to answer, it was a rhetorical question.

ConsRule » 09 Nov 2024, 4:30 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2024, 4:30 pm

You *******.  The link to the Kaplan filing you are so proud of posting clearly states that Carroll did not prevail at proving Trump committed rape.  You are arguing against your own post.

Are all liberals as **** stupid as you?  No need to answer, it was a rhetorical question.

We've already established that you don't understand the written word and substitite your own fantasies.

Stop misrepresenting Kaplan's filing.

He explains exactly why the jury awarded E. Jean Carroll $5 million.

There are the facts, and the lies you tell yourself.

Blackvegetable » 09 Nov 2024, 8:49 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2024, 8:49 pm

We've already established that you don't understand the written word and substitite your own fantasies.

Stop misrepresenting Kaplan's filing.

He explains exactly why the jury awarded E. Jean Carroll $5 million.

There are the facts, and the lies you tell yourself.
 

I am not misinterpreting anything...it is a direct quote from YOUR LINK.

The award was made because Carroll prevail on every other issue. 

Damn...you are a world class stupid ****

ConsRule » 09 Nov 2024, 8:53 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2024, 8:53 pm

I am not misinterpreting anything...it is a direct quote from YOUR LINK.

The award was made because Carroll prevail on every other issue. 

Damn...you are a world class stupid ****

What reason did Kaplan give for his conclusion.

Blackvegetable » 09 Nov 2024, 9:37 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2024, 9:37 pm

What reason did Kaplan give for his conclusion.

     


 

Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2024, 3:15 pm

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

done.

Again.

Lying jig.