Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 11 Nov 2024, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2024, 8:06 am

Neither of you know anything....but you're quite emphatic in your ignorance.

The one that doesn't know ANYTHING is YOU, DICKBREATH!!

You can't try to APPLY A FEDERAL DEFINTION into a NY STATE COURT proceeding since that FEDERAL LAW doesn't apply to a STATE ISSUE!! Ever hear of the 10th Amendment to the US Constitution?? Or is that too SO FAR OVER YOUR EMPTY **** SKULL that you missed that one too?? As NO OTHER STATE'S LAWS apply in NY STATE EITHER!!

NO JURY has found Trump guilty of ANY RAPE, DICKBREATH!! Your continual attempts to claim he was is as **** UP as your *** IS AFTER THIS CURB STOMPING I SO MASTERFULLY ADMINISTERED!!

 

*Beekeeper » 11 Nov 2024, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2024, 8:10 am

The one that doesn't know ANYTHING is YOU, DICKBREATH!!

You can't try to APPLY A FEDERAL DEFINTION into a NY STATE COURT proceeding since that FEDERAL LAW doesn't apply to a STATE ISSUE!! Ever hear of the 10th Amendment to the US Constitution?? Or is that too SO FAR OVER YOUR EMPTY **** SKULL that you missed that one too?? As NO OTHER STATE'S LAWS apply in NY STATE EITHER!!

NO JURY has found Trump guilty of ANY RAPE, DICKBREATH!! Your continual attempts to claim he was is as **** UP as your *** IS AFTER THIS CURB STOMPING I SO MASTERFULLY ADMINISTERED!!

It's a CIVIL matter.

Why does Judge Kaplan labor the definition of "rape", Fondler?

Demonstrate that you understand the context.
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Nov 2024, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2024, 8:13 am

It's a CIVIL matter.

Why does Judge Kaplan labor the definition of "rape", Fondler?

Demonstrate that you understand the context.

Because he's a liberal shill.  Why does he clearly and plainly state the jury ruled Carroll failed to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Trump committed rape?

ConsRule » 11 Nov 2024, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2024, 8:21 am

Because he's a liberal shill.  Why does he clearly and plainly state the jury ruled Carroll failed to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Trump committed rape?

Because he's a liberal shill.

you appear stuck on this whine, Connie...and now you are calling yourself a liar..

You're a hysterical mess.

Are you gonna answer the question, or bluff your way through another day?

 

Blackvegetable » 11 Nov 2024, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2024, 8:13 am

It's a CIVIL matter.

Why does Judge Kaplan labor the definition of "rape", Fondler?

Demonstrate that you understand the context.

NY STATE LAWS apply to CIVIL CASES AS WELL, DICKFACE!!

Kaplan is a TRUMP HATER and for that reason ALONE he "labored" over inserting his OWN BRAND OF DISTASTE AND HATE FOR TRUMP!! 

The REALITY OF THIS ENTIRE **** THAT YOU REFUSE TO ACCEPT IS THAT A JURY DID NOT FIND TRUMP COMMITTED RAPE. PERIOD!! THAT doesn't not empower ANY JUDGE to make his OWN OPINION HEARD over a NOT GUILTY FINDING in any court regardless of if he disagrees or not. PERIOD!!

And THAT ALONE is more than enough reason for APPEAL since it in and of itself PROVES KAPLAN SHOWED BIAS AGAINST THE DEFENDANT!! 

Now, DICKFACE, I am in no mood today to continually CURB STOMP YOUR *** over and over today. So TAKE IT LIKE THE ****** YOU ARE AND SHUT YOUR **** FACE NOW!!! You're to **** to show it man to man so I can BASH IT IN, SO THIS HAS TO SUFFICE!!

*Beekeeper » 11 Nov 2024, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2024, 8:28 am

NY STATE LAWS apply to CIVIL CASES AS WELL, DICKFACE!!

Kaplan is a TRUMP HATER and for that reason ALONE he "labored" over inserting his OWN BRAND OF DISTASTE AND HATE FOR TRUMP!! 

The REALITY OF THIS ENTIRE **** THAT YOU REFUSE TO ACCEPT IS THAT A JURY DID NOT FIND TRUMP COMMITTED RAPE. PERIOD!! THAT doesn't not empower ANY JUDGE to make his OWN OPINION HEARD over a NOT GUILTY FINDING in any court regardless of if he disagrees or not. PERIOD!!

And THAT ALONE is more than enough reason for APPEAL since it in and of itself PROVES KAPLAN SHOWED BIAS AGAINST THE DEFENDANT!! 

Now, DICKFACE, I am in no mood today to continually CURB STOMP YOUR *** over and over today. So TAKE IT LIKE THE ****** YOU ARE AND SHUT YOUR **** FACE NOW!!! You're to **** to show it man to man so I can BASH IT IN, SO THIS HAS TO SUFFICE!!

Not criminal laws....

Which is EXACTLY the point Judge Kaplan makes IN RESPONSE TO THE MOTION BY GRIFTY'S ATTORNEYS.

@ConsRule  
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Nov 2024, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2024, 8:31 am

Not criminal laws....

Which is EXACTLY the point Judge Kaplan makes IN RESPONSE TO THE MOTION BY GRIFTY'S ATTORNEYS.

@ConsRule
 

Kaplan's filing does not, and never will, change the verdict rendered by the jury.  FYI...the verdict they rendered was Trump did not commit rape.

But you don't deal in fact...you're only interested in the liberal spin.  It must really suck for you that it had no visible impact on the election.  In fact, Trump did better with women, college age voters, Latino voters and black male voters.  He kicked Commie-lahaha's ***, getting 58% of the votes.

SouthernFried » 09 Nov 2024, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2024, 8:37 am

Is that the kind of porn you watch? Because nobody here has a **** clue what you are talking about.

it's brown's patented hoodspeak...super secret I hear...  
 

Sumela » 09 Nov 2024, 9:42 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Nov 2024, 9:42 pm

     

       

Blackvegetable » 10 Nov 2024, 9:07 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Nov 2024, 9:07 pm

The United States Attorney General announced in January 2012 a new definition of rape
for the purpose of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Uniform Crime Report Summary
Reporting System by, among other changes, “recogniz[ing] that rape with an object can be
as traumatic as penile/vaginal rape.” U.S. Department of Justice, An Updated Definition of
Rape, Jan. 6, 2012, https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/bl ... ition-rape
(new definition of “rape” as “[t]he penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus
with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without
the consent of the victim”) (emphasis added).

ibid

for the purpose of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Uniform Crime Report Summary
Reporting System...

wallow...
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Nov 2024, 6:00 am » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2024, 6:00 am

show me.

This is a CIVIL matter...it need not do ANYTHING relative to the NY CRIMINAL code.

As Judge Kaplan makes clear in the parts of the filing you are hoping no one sees.

Now is the time for you to explain what qualifies you to tell the presiding judge what he "has to" do.

I bet that you have no legal training or experience.

One more time...

Me - **** stupid wid muh fee fees

You - spot on....

FIFY...

ConsRule » 11 Nov 2024, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2024, 10:37 am

Kaplan's filing does not, and never will, change the verdict rendered by the jury.  FYI...the verdict they rendered was Trump did not commit rape.

But you don't deal in fact...you're only interested in the liberal spin.  It must really suck for you that it had no visible impact on the election.  In fact, Trump did better with women, college age voters, Latino voters and black male voters.  He kicked Commie-lahaha's ***, getting 58% of the votes.

it clarifies the verdict.

As the document you're choosing not to read makes clear, the jury did not conclude that the evidence clearly indicted Grifty's small penis, rather than his small hand...the liability of his filthy digits, on the other hand, is clearly established by the jury's explicit reference to sexual assault. 

The only act of sexual assault alleged is the digital penetration.

Are you following so far?
 

ROG62 » 11 Nov 2024, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2024, 11:03 am

for the purpose of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Uniform Crime Report Summary
Reporting System...

wallow...

Defining RAPE.

Blackvegetable » 11 Nov 2024, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2024, 12:05 pm

it clarifies the verdict.

As the document you're choosing not to read makes clear, the jury did not conclude that the evidence clearly indicted Grifty's small penis, rather than his small hand...the liability of his filthy digits, on the other hand, is clearly established by the jury's explicit reference to sexual assault. 

The only act of sexual assault alleged is the digital penetration.

Are you following so far?

Now, DICKFACE, I'm going to CURB STOMP YOU ONCE AGAIN over this **** of yours and why Kaplan's "reframing" of the verdict is even MORE ****!!

A. A JURY gets it's INSTRUCTIONS on verdict FROM THE JUDGE- albeit in this case, Kaplan. 

B. THAT is easily proven- Under New York criminal law, an assault constitutes "rape" only if it involves vaginal penetration by a penis. That was the definition the jury was instructed to use in the civil case. And that WAS FROM KAPLAN!!! WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS so there is NO misinterpretation of what LAW he is using in this case and in his DEFINITION OF RAPE.

C. And his "reframing" came ONLY after he got PIG STUCK by a NO RAPE OCCURRED VERDICT that he THOUGHT would happen and didn't because jurors are smarter than YOU OR KAPLAN!!

So there can be NO OTHER DEFINTION of RAPE USED for a VERDICT and the JURY FOUND THAT NO RAPE OCCURRED. PERIOD!!

CASE IS CLOSED, YOUR *** IS CURB STOMPED AND YOU ARE COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY GUTTED TO THE GILLS!!

 

Blackvegetable » 11 Nov 2024, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2024, 12:05 pm

it clarifies the verdict.

As the document you're choosing not to read makes clear, the jury did not conclude that the evidence clearly indicted Grifty's small penis, rather than his small hand...the liability of his filthy digits, on the other hand, is clearly established by the jury's explicit reference to sexual assault. 

The only act of sexual assault alleged is the digital penetration.

Are you following so far?

Yes, of course.  But the verdict really didn't need clarification.  When the question was answered by the jury, it was a simple Yes or No...Trump did not commit rape. 

ConsRule » 11 Nov 2024, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2024, 1:01 pm

Yes, of course.  But the verdict really didn't need clarification.  When the question was answered by the jury, it was a simple Yes or No...Trump did not commit rape.

Read the filing, Pilgrim.

If Grifty hadn't told his hacks to try to save him some money, Kaplan would never have had reason to clarify.

Not only is Grifty an idiot, his lawyers are clowns.
 

*Beekeeper » 11 Nov 2024, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2024, 12:25 pm

Now, DICKFACE, I'm going to CURB STOMP YOU ONCE AGAIN over this **** of yours and why Kaplan's "reframing" of the verdict is even MORE ****!!

A. A JURY gets it's INSTRUCTIONS on verdict FROM THE JUDGE- albeit in this case, Kaplan. 

B. THAT is easily proven- Under New York criminal law, an assault constitutes "rape" only if it involves vaginal penetration by a penis. That was the definition the jury was instructed to use in the civil case. And that WAS FROM KAPLAN!!! WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS so there is NO misinterpretation of what LAW he is using in this case and in his DEFINITION OF RAPE.

C. And his "reframing" came ONLY after he got PIG STUCK by a NO RAPE OCCURRED VERDICT that he THOUGHT would happen and didn't because jurors are smarter than YOU OR KAPLAN!!

So there can be NO OTHER DEFINTION of RAPE USED for a VERDICT and the JURY FOUND THAT NO RAPE OCCURRED. PERIOD!!

CASE IS CLOSED, YOUR *** IS CURB STOMPED AND YOU ARE COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY GUTTED TO THE GILLS!!

albeit in this case, Kaplan

So **** stupid.

so there is NO misinterpretation of what LAW he is using in this case and in his DEFINITION OF RAPE.

The jury chose Sexual Assault, in reference to the plaintiff's claim of digital penetration. This informed their determination of 2 million in damages.

In response to Team Grifty's motion floating the very argument you are trying to make, Kaplan explained why 2 million was entirely reasonable.

Now shut the **** up.

 

Blackvegetable » 11 Nov 2024, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2024, 2:01 pm

So **** stupid.

The jury chose Sexual Assault, in reference to the plaintiff's claim of digital penetration. This informed their determination of 2 million in damages.

In response to Team Grifty's motion floating the very argument you are trying to make, Kaplan explained why 2 million was entirely reasonable.

Now shut the **** up.

Did KAPLAN issue JURY INSTRUCTIONS that said NY STATE LAW had to be followed in determining a "rape" finding??

Why YES, YES HE DID!!! And in writing and given as much to the entire JURY!!

And what did that JURY FIND?? NO RAPE OCCURRED!! So any "additional" **** he adds is called A NOTHING BURGER and not a finding or rape, DICKSUCKING PIECE OF ****!!

And that, is what we call, CURB STOMPED MASSIVELY and one you should just take like the ****** you are and SHUT THE **** UP ABOUT THIS FOREVER as the PIG GUTTINGS WILL CONTINUE UNTIL YOU DO!!

YOU LOST, DICKFACE CUCKY!!

                   

Blackvegetable » 11 Nov 2024, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2024, 1:47 pm

Read the filing, Pilgrim.

No need to do that...I can read the actual jury verdict.

Blackvegetable » 11 Nov 2024, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2024, 2:01 pm

So **** stupid.

The jury chose Sexual Assault, in reference to the plaintiff's claim of digital penetration. This informed their determination of 2 million in damages.

In response to Team Grifty's motion floating the very argument you are trying to make, Kaplan explained why 2 million was entirely reasonable.

Now shut the **** up.

You keep losing sight of the topic of our conversation.  I said, no jury of any kind, in any court anywhere on earth has found that Trump committed rape.  You just want to change the topic.