Where do you get the idea that your uninformed whiny *** MAGAt tripe supercedes the opinion of the presiding judge?ConsRule » 11 Nov 2024, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑ You keep losing sight of the topic of our conversation. I said, no jury of any kind, in any court anywhere on earth has found that Trump committed rape. You just want to change the topic.
Show me where I said it did. I'm just sticking to the topic...unlike your whiny liberal ***.Blackvegetable » 11 Nov 2024, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Where do you get the idea that your uninformed whiny *** MAGAt tripe supercedes the opinion of the presiding judge?
This is why you are a moron and will never get better.
The last time you yapped that you took it in the teeth and had nothing to say.ConsRule » 11 Nov 2024, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Show me where I said it did. I'm just sticking to the topic...unlike your whiny liberal ***.
You have no **** idea what you're talking about.*Beekeeper » 11 Nov 2024, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Did KAPLAN issue JURY INSTRUCTIONS that said NY STATE LAW had to be followed in determining a "rape" finding??
Why YES, YES HE DID!!! And in writing and given as much to the entire JURY!!
And what did that JURY FIND?? NO RAPE OCCURRED!! So any "additional" **** he adds is called A NOTHING BURGER and not a finding or rape, DICKSUCKING PIECE OF ****!!
And that, is what we call, CURB STOMPED MASSIVELY and one you should just take like the ****** you are and SHUT THE **** UP ABOUT THIS FOREVER as the PIG GUTTINGS WILL CONTINUE UNTIL YOU DO!!
YOU LOST, DICKFACE CUCKY!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Once again...you lost sight of the topic. Do some research in this thread and tell me what position I have taken.Blackvegetable » 11 Nov 2024, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑ This is why you are a moron and will never get better.
Team Grifty tried your argument...they got smoked.
The jury awarded the plaintiff 2 million dollars because, regardless of NY's former criminal statute, they belived -as do the FBI, the UCMJ, the State of NY today, and all reasonable people - that non-consensual digital penetration is Rape.
That will persist whether or not you ever learn to read.
So I take it you can't find me saying that. You making **** up again.Blackvegetable » 11 Nov 2024, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑ The last time you yapped that you took it in the teeth and had nothing to say.
You're OBVIOUSLY NOT sticking to the topic if you ignore Kaplan's response to Team Grifty's motion.
**** idiot.
You have no clue because you haven't read the filing.ConsRule » 11 Nov 2024, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Once again...you lost sight of the topic. Do some research in this thread and tell me what position I have taken.
No...read it again.ConsRule » 11 Nov 2024, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑ So I take it you can't find me saying that. You making **** up again.
ConsRule » 11 Nov 2024, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑ You keep losing sight of the topic of our conversation. I said, no jury of any kind, in any court anywhere on earth has found that Trump committed rape. You just want to change the topic.
Yes, really.*Beekeeper » 11 Nov 2024, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh really now.
So WHO gave the JURY their JURY INSTRUCTIONS and WHO WROTE THOSE???
GO!!!
(this is going to be a SPECTACULAR CURB STOMPING OF THIS *** IDIOT YOU HAVE EVER SEEN!!!![]()
)
Blackvegetable » 11 Nov 2024, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, really.
What was the substance of Team Grifty's appeal of the amount awarded by the jury?
you don't know anything.*Beekeeper » 11 Nov 2024, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑ THATS not the issue, DICKFACE!!! THE ISSUE IS, WHAT and BY WHOM DID THE JURY RECEIVE AS THEIR INSTRUCTIONS TO USE NY STATE LAW IN DETERMINING A RAPE FINDING!!! AND WHAT FINDING WAS MADE BY THE SAME JURY IN REGARD TO A RAPE OCCURRING??
Keep trying to change your **** SUBJECT AND KEEP GETTING CURB STOMPED IN DOING SO!!
How many is that now?? 20 today already or is it MORE???
YOU CAN'T EVEN DEFINE THE TERM WOMAN
That's cause he's a pecker sucker democrat child molester.
How many little boys you suck off today, ***?Blackvegetable » 11 Nov 2024, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, really.
What was the substance of Team Grifty's appeal of the amount awarded by the jury?
murdock » 11 Nov 2024, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑ That's cause he's a pecker sucker democrat child molester.
The topic is not the filing you *******.Blackvegetable » 11 Nov 2024, 3:04 pm » wrote: ↑ You have no clue because you haven't read the filing.
At this point, I don't have to tell you a damned thing.
Of course it is, *******.