It's YOUR topic...but it is not the topic I selected with my first post.
Your first post was riddled with lies.ConsRule » 11 Nov 2024, 4:24 pm » wrote: ↑ It's YOUR topic...but it is not the topic I selected with my first post.
Only in whiny *** partisan liberal minds.
Every post you place is recited speculation life isn't self evident time adapting when displaced in space daily since conceived by previous ancestry changing population forward each great great grandchild born one at a time.
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.*Beekeeper » 11 Nov 2024, 5:29 pm » wrote: ↑ NOT ME in total DENIAL that a JURY FOUND TRUMP DID NOT COMMIT A RAPE!! And THAT is all that counts in our JUDICIAL SYSTEM, DICKBREATH!!
Sucks, huh??
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
No...because they stand in contrast with the facts.
You lost, ***.Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑ A federal judge in Texas on Thursday struck down a new Biden administration program that sought to provide a path to U.S. citizenship for hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants married to American citizens.
The ruling, issued by Judge J. Campbell Barker of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, came months after 16 Republican-led states, led by Texas’ attorney general, Ken Paxton, filed a lawsuit claiming that the administration lacked the legal authority to enact the program. In August, Judge Barker temporarily blocked the initiative, just days after it had gone into place.
The Biden administration started the initiative, known as Keeping Families Together, in August, allowing undocumented immigrants who were married to U.S. citizens and had been in the United States for 10 years or more a chance to gain a green card without leaving the country.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/07/us/b ... ogram.html
Here we have an effort, led by an AG under indictment, toiling on behalf of a felon, operating under a banner of Law&Order.
It's about upholding the law, of course.
How **** and petty can hypocrites get?
The jury said differently...that's all that matters, brown...fee fees need not apply...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Do you really want me to taintpunt this crap?Cannonpointer » 11 Nov 2024, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑ You lost, ***.
Americans understand that Trump is a victim of lawfare - not a criminal.
The people rejected your dick sucker and affirmed their faith that Trump is not a criminal.
No...it didn't.ROG62 » 11 Nov 2024, 7:18 pm » wrote: ↑ The jury said differently...that's all that matters, brown...fee fees need not apply...
Thank you for proving my point. All I have been saying is that no jury, in any court anywhere in the world has found that Trump committed rape.Blackvegetable » 11 Nov 2024, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote
I have no expectations at all of you, fruitcake. You don't know a man from a woman.
sorry brown...I'm a literal type of guy...Blackvegetable » 11 Nov 2024, 7:45 pm » wrote: ↑ No...it didn't.
Even if you don't have the ability to understand why.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Blackvegetable » 11 Nov 2024, 6:00 pm » wrote: ↑ “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
Fondler,
Did you even graduate from an accredited college?
Did you ever learn from your own history of social behavior compared to your personal time living uniquely you every heartbeat daily as your body never stays the same total sum reached each next heartbeat you have?Blackvegetable » 11 Nov 2024, 6:00 pm » wrote: ↑ “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
Fondler,
Did you even graduate from an accredited college?
He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”*Beekeeper » 12 Nov 2024, 6:06 am » wrote: ↑ THE JURY, DICKBREATH!! What did THEY FIND that Kaplan STATED THEY FOUND- NO RAPE WAS FOUND TO HAVE BEEN PROVEN!!
Sucks, huh?? The NY STATE LAW defines "rape" and the JURY FOUND TRUMP DIDN'T COMMIT RAPE!! Sucks more, huh??
And why are you stopping at one accredited university, not college??
Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 7:01 am » wrote: ↑ He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
Can you read that, Fondler?
Jury of well trained one track mentalities staying in character defending humanity until extinction. Social justification wins again defeating instinctive awareness daily.Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 7:01 am » wrote: ↑ He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
Can you read that, Fondler?