NYTIMESBlackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑ A federal judge in Texas on Thursday struck down a new Biden administration program that sought to provide a path to U.S. citizenship for hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants married to American citizens.
The ruling, issued by Judge J. Campbell Barker of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, came months after 16 Republican-led states, led by Texas’ attorney general, Ken Paxton, filed a lawsuit claiming that the administration lacked the legal authority to enact the program. In August, Judge Barker temporarily blocked the initiative, just days after it had gone into place.
The Biden administration started the initiative, known as Keeping Families Together, in August, allowing undocumented immigrants who were married to U.S. citizens and had been in the United States for 10 years or more a chance to gain a green card without leaving the country.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/07/us/b ... ogram.html
Here we have an effort, led by an AG under indictment, toiling on behalf of a felon, operating under a banner of Law&Order.
It's about upholding the law, of course.
How **** and petty can hypocrites get?
I feel anyone compelled to demand a definition of "woman" is a moron.ConsRule » 12 Nov 2024, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑ Someone who cannot define a woman and cannot understand/accept a jury verdict has no business calling anyone a moron.
keep clinging to Kaplan's ballsack, brown...he sure seems to be rockin' your world...Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 7:07 am » wrote: ↑ Read it again, bGroomer.
.He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom He's the PRESIDING JUDGE.ROG62 » 12 Nov 2024, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ keep clinging to Kaplan's ballsack, brown...he sure seems to be rockin' your world...
Stop running for a moment and answer the question.
Remember the negro colloquialism, "here cum da judge".....you personify that conception of a superior being in a black robe....when he's just another human being, consumed by prejudices, bigotry, and TDS.Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ He's the PRESIDING JUDGE.
Is there a limit to your denial?
Remember Hee Haw?RebelGator » 12 Nov 2024, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑ Remember the negro colloquialism, "here cum da judge".....you personify that conception of a superior being in a black robe....when he's just another human being, consumed by prejudices, bigotry, and TDS.
see you don't have a limit with in our performing arts situation sustaining the show must go on dedication to ignoring how and why you specifically occupying time daily in an ever changing body living between added heartbeats today.Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ He's the PRESIDING JUDGE.
Is there a limit to your denial?
The judge's instructions would include his clarification of the law as it stood at the time of deliberations...they didn't choose rape...Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑ I'm convinced that you're a moron.
on what grounds?
Responding to the motion?
Now read the filing, FauxChristian...and stop bearing false moron. I'm pretty sure it's a sin.

JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom We're now POST verdict....ROG62 » 12 Nov 2024, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ The judge's instructions would include his clarification of the law as it stood at the time of deliberations...they didn't choose rape...
I'm convinced that you're a moron...
Not after the trial is done...case closed, bitch...Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ He's the PRESIDING JUDGE.
Is there a limit to my stupidity?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Exactly...NO RAPE...Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ We're now POST verdict....
On what grounds did Team Grifty appeal the judgement?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom That is why he addresses Team Grifty's post verdict motion, Rog.
Rog,
pot calls kettle black...Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ Rog,
Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened.
Now answer the question.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑ I feel anyone compelled to demand a definition of "woman" is a moron.
If you accepted the jury's verdict, you wouldn't refuse to answer questions about the details, nor would you lie about where and why Kaplan wrote as he did.
But you do.
You haven't answered the question.
Answer the question.*Beekeeper » 12 Nov 2024, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑ No, DICKHEAD, the ONLY LIARS here are Kaplan and YOU by claiming the "jury indeed found a rape occurred", when the JURY FOUND NO SUCH THING!!
Now, you can either PROVE that they found such rape occurred or you can find that they found NO RAPE OCCURRED. ONE make you look like the CURB STOMPED IDIOT YOU ARE but does allow you to apologize for your LIES and perhaps forgiveness will come. THE OTHER keeps the CURB STOMPING COMING and pretty soon, you' give up and HOPE you can try again with different outcomes. Einstein called that the DEFINTION OF INSANITY, which everyone on this forum already can attest to your INSANITY AND UTTER STUPIDITY!!
Nice, huh??
Nod.