Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 5:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Let's simplify this...
The jury determined that Grifty had digitally penetrated her....that is defined, broadly, as rape.
Grifty, having assumed the role of Active Party to such an event, can be rightfully called by the same name as the lowliest private in the armies under his command accused of the same act.
You have no **** clue what you're yammering about.*Beekeeper » 12 Nov 2024, 5:59 pm » wrote: ↑ A COURT OF LAW doesn't use the "broadly accepted" anything, DICKFACED PIECE OF ****. THEY ARE REQUIRED UNDER THE LAW TO USE THE DEFINITION AS LAID OUT BY THE PENAL CODE!! What they DID do is find NO RAPE WAS PROVEN!!
https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png
Sucks, huh??
I do not suppress him. The system does. I merely watch it do what it does, without intervening.Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑ Why should I read your **** while you suppress @CP's Battered Uvula ?
ConsRule » 12 Nov 2024, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Unfortunately, in court you have to go by the law...not use the definition you like in the Funk and Wagnalls dictionary. By the way, none of the jury award was related to rape. Which makes me wonder why Kaplan felt the need to lie about that portion of the case. Probably so idiots like you could use his lie for election spin. Man...that did a lot of good. Trump only won 58% of the vote.
you're so **** stupid it beggars the imagination.Trump only won 58% of the vote.
Why do 300 soks appear, spontaneously, to spend rep points they couldn't possibly have earned?Cannonpointer » 12 Nov 2024, 6:33 pm » wrote: ↑ I do not suppress him. The system does. I merely watch it do what it does, without intervening.
cut to the chase or STFU, brown...Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑ Instructions are PRIOR, this is a POST verdict matter.
The reason is made PERFECTLY CLEAR once you answer the question you continue to run from.
This is why you are a moron product of a **** JuCo.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom I have already, **** idiot.
**** lying POS
I show you and you kill yourself.
Kaplan is a NY state judge.*Beekeeper » 12 Nov 2024, 6:38 pm » wrote: ↑ No, DICKSUCKYBOI, I have the EVIDENCE and PROOF in BLACK AND WHITE that the JURY did NOT find Trump committed any RAPE as you claim!!
Which means, the ONLY YAMMERING being done here is coming from YOUR ASSHOLE trying to make some claim based on a **** LIE you and Kaplan are spreading!!!
A COURT OF LAW uses DEFINTIONS as laid out by the State's Legislature in the Penal Code!! NOTHING else matters NOR is legal!! Which also makes Kaplan's **** CLAIM a farcical diatribe based on HIS OPINION, not any LEGAL FOUNDATION or BASIS!!
Now, that's going to leave MORE MARKS on that ALREADY BLISTERED AND MANGLED *** OF YOURS!! AS the Curb Stompings CONTINUE!!
I do, and you kill yourself.
No, you're speculating because of a larger sum than sexual abuse warrants...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Stupid **** piece of ****, focus.ROG62 » 12 Nov 2024, 7:24 pm » wrote: ↑ No, you're speculating because of a larger sum than sexual abuse warrants...
did anyone in court, IE jury, Trump, or his legal team agree or admission made?
the judge clearly overstepped his bounds citing his opinion going directly against the jury's verdict...it's not his business because the jury spoke LOUD AND CLEAR...
your **** knows no bounds, brown...
But not according to the laws of NY at the time of the incident or the trial. That is why the jury verdict says Trump did not commit rape.Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 5:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Let's simplify this...
The jury determined that Grifty had digitally penetrated her....that is defined, broadly, as rape.
Grifty, having assumed the role of Active Party to such an event, can be rightfully called by the same name as the lowliest private in the armies under his command accused of the same act.
Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑ I do, and you kill yourself.
Do we have a deal, Coward?
THIS IS A CIVIL CASE.ConsRule » 12 Nov 2024, 8:07 pm » wrote: ↑ But not according to the laws of NY at the time of the incident or the trial. That is why the jury verdict says Trump did not commit rape.
You can use your own definition to whine...but the official verdict in the trial had to follow the law.
1 Did Ms Carroll prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Mr. Trump raped Ms. Carroll? Jury answered no.
a female person associated with a particular place, activity, or occupation.
I don't give a **** if it's a case of beer. And the filing is completely irrelevant. Once again, my assertion...WHICH IS FACT...is that no jury, in any court anywhere on earth has found that Trump committed rape.Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 8:16 pm » wrote: ↑ THIS IS A CIVIL CASE.
He is not being CONVICTED of rape, he is being found liable for digitally penetrating a non consenting party. Digital penetration is broadly, and now even in NY, considered rape.
This is why it is entirely appropriate to call Grifty a rapist. It is how you refer to a digital penetrator who dispenses with consent.
Just read the filing, Pilgrim.