Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
"It's Not That We Hate...It's Because, You Know, They're Criminals."
"It's Not That We Hate...It's Because, You Know, They're Criminals."
By Blackvegetable
8 Nov 2024 5:47 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
12 Nov 2024 7:27 pm
Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 8:18 pm » wrote: ↑ a female person associated with a particular place, activity, or occupation.
C YA!
nice try asswipe... define female.
12 Nov 2024 7:27 pm
You clearly do.ConsRule » 12 Nov 2024, 8:24 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't give a **** if it's a case of beer. And the filing is completely irrelevant. Once again, my assertion...WHICH IS FACT...is that no jury, in any court anywhere on earth has found that Trump committed rape.
You not being mature enough to accept that doesn't change the verdict of the jury.
You've said remarkably stupid ****...all in defense of a rapist.
Not out of Christian charity, but because you're a moral leper worshiping a false yamgod.
12 Nov 2024 7:30 pm
DIGITALLY??????Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Stupid **** piece of ****, focus.
The jury found that Grifty had digitally penetrated the victim, without consent.
That is rape.
YOU WOULD BE INSULTED IF YOUR MANDINGO DIGITALLY PENETRATED YOU.
PEDO/PREDATOR BIDEN WAS A MASTER OF DIGITAL PENETRATION.
THAT LITTLE DICK WAS TOO LIMP.
12 Nov 2024 7:34 pm
I'm just stating fact. As a Christian...hate the sin, love the sinner. That's the easy version of scripture, but it's true.Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 8:27 pm » wrote: ↑ You clearly do.
You've said remarkably stupid ****...all in defense of a rapist.
Not out of Christian charity, but because you're a moral leper worshiping a false yamgod.
12 Nov 2024 7:38 pm
No, you aren't.ConsRule » 12 Nov 2024, 8:34 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm just stating fact. As a Christian...hate the sin, love the sinner. That's the easy version of scripture, but it's true.
Digital penetration is rape.
You're free to attach an asterisk to it and offer a lengthy qualification, but that's to suit your own needs.
12 Nov 2024 7:42 pm
No...the law of the state of NY, at the time of the incident and trial...clearly states you are wrong. If it makes you feel better, they changed the law. However, the new law doesn't apply to the Trump/Carroll incident because the Constitution prohibits that.Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑ No, you aren't.
Digital penetration is rape.
You're free to attach an asterisk to it and offer a lengthy qualification, but that's to suit your own needs.
12 Nov 2024 7:46 pm
ConsRule » 12 Nov 2024, 8:42 pm » wrote: ↑ No...the law of the state of NY, at the time of the incident and trial...clearly states you are wrong. If it makes you feel better, they changed the law. However, the new law doesn't apply to the Trump/Carroll incident because the Constitution prohibits that.
Which, as the judge makes clear, doesn't bind anyone, except you.the law of the state of NY, at the time of the incident and trial.
Which is why he upheld the jury's award of 2 million.
12 Nov 2024 7:49 pm
No...because the jury did not award anything for that. Juries don't award money for something that wasn't proved.Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 8:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Which, as the judge makes clear, doesn't bind anyone, except you.
Which is why he upheld the jury's award of 2 million.
12 Nov 2024 8:06 pm
They awarded it for sexual assault.ConsRule » 12 Nov 2024, 8:49 pm » wrote: ↑ No...because the jury did not award anything for that. Juries don't award money for something that wasn't proved.
The act in question was digital penetration.
The Team Grifty motion was denied.
Their argument was rejected.
Digital penetrators are rapists.....you may monitor the innertubes and yell at those who remind you of it...
12 Nov 2024 8:23 pm
sorry brown, NY law states differently at the time ...as the judge expressedly stated in your post to which the jury followed and deliberated finding him NOT GUILTY...Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Stupid **** piece of ****, focus.
The jury found that Grifty had digitally penetrated the victim, without consent.
That is rape.
you're only speculating because of a larger sum than sexual abuse warrants...
did anyone in court, IE jury, Trump, or his legal team agree or admission made?
the judge clearly overstepped his bounds citing his opinion going directly against the jury's verdict...it's not his business because the jury spoke LOUD AND CLEAR...
your **** knows no bounds, brown...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
12 Nov 2024 9:23 pm
I agree. None of that changes the fact the jury ruled Trump DID NOT commit rape.Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 9:06 pm » wrote: ↑ They awarded it for sexual assault.
The act in question was digital penetration.
The Team Grifty motion was denied.
Their argument was rejected.
Digital penetrators are rapists.....you may monitor the innertubes and yell at those who remind you of it...
13 Nov 2024 3:15 am
Digital penetration IS rape, **** brickConsRule » 12 Nov 2024, 10:23 pm » wrote: ↑ I agree. None of that changes the fact the jury ruled Trump DID NOT commit rape.
13 Nov 2024 4:43 am
Not in the state of NY at the time of the incident or the trial. Why do you have trouble accepting that fact? The jury verdict form cannot be more clear.
13 Nov 2024 5:25 am
And a NY State JUDGE must follow the LEGAL DEFINTIONS as written BY THE STATE LEGISLATURE IN THE NY STATE PENAL CODE which is THE LAW OF NY STATE!!!Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 7:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Kaplan is a NY state judge.
You're a **** idiot.
I know which way I'm leaning...
Sucks you don't seem to want to grasp onto that SIMPLE YET VITALLY IMPORTANT CONCEPT, huh, dickysuckyBOI??
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
13 Nov 2024 5:52 am
ConsRule » 13 Nov 2024, 5:43 am » wrote: ↑ Not in the state of NY at the time of the incident or the trial. Why do you have trouble accepting that fact? The jury verdict form cannot be more clear.
A matter of absolutely no consequence.
Grifty IS a rapist.
13 Nov 2024 5:59 am
BGroomer,*Beekeeper » 13 Nov 2024, 6:25 am » wrote: ↑ And a NY State JUDGE must follow the LEGAL DEFINTIONS as written BY THE STATE LEGISLATURE IN THE NY STATE PENAL CODE which is THE LAW OF NY STATE!!!
Sucks you don't seem to want to grasp onto that SIMPLE YET VITALLY IMPORTANT CONCEPT, huh, dickysuckyBOI??
It is a CIVIL case...the JURY UNANIMOUSLY agreed on Sexual Abuse, specifically digital penetration.
Which is rape.
Kaplan's only contribution is to explain that rape is rape and those who commit it are rapists.
Nod.
13 Nov 2024 6:08 am
Which finger do you use, Digit Boy?Blackvegetable » 13 Nov 2024, 6:59 am » wrote: ↑ BGroomer,
It is a CIVIL case...the JURY UNANIMOUSLY agreed on Sexual Abuse, specifically digital penetration.
Which is rape.
Kaplan's only contribution is to explain that rape is rape and those who commit it are rapists.
Nod.
13 Nov 2024 6:09 am
13 Nov 2024 6:18 am
If it is of no consequence, why not publicly acknowledge that fact?Blackvegetable » 13 Nov 2024, 6:52 am » wrote: ↑ A matter of absolutely no consequence.
Grifty IS a rapist.
Only in the whiny *** partisan liberal mind.
Carry on...butt hurt liberal.
13 Nov 2024 6:24 am
Kaplan did.ConsRule » 13 Nov 2024, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑ If it is of no consequence, why not publicly acknowledge that fact?
Only in the whiny *** partisan liberal mind.
Carry on...butt hurt liberal.
You should read the filing now.
Typical whining brain dead MAGAt.
Who is online
In total there are 4721 users online :: 19 registered, 14 bots, and 4688 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Zeets2, Squatchman, Buffalo, ConservativeWave, FJB, MR-7, Beekeeper, LowIQTrash, PhiloBeddo, SouthernFried, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, Huey, Fuelman, PoliticalPopUp
Bots: DuckDuckBot, Firefox/7.0, facebookexternalhit, proximic, NING, ADmantX, Yahoo! Slurp, Baiduspider, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot, YandexBot, Applebot, Googlebot, curl/7