Blackvegetable » 13 Nov 2024, 6:59 am » wrote: ↑ BGroomer,
It is a CIVIL case...the JURY UNANIMOUSLY agreed on Sexual Abuse, specifically digital penetration.
Which is rape.
Kaplan's only contribution is to explain that rape is rape and those who commit it are rapists.
Nod.


JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom My apologies. I keep forgetting liberals like you dot deal in fact, the partisan spin is much, much more important.Blackvegetable » 13 Nov 2024, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑ Kaplan did.
You should read the filing now.
Typical whining brain dead MAGAt.
I cite the filing, you whine a lot of narrative.ConsRule » 13 Nov 2024, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑ My apologies. I keep forgetting liberals like you dot deal in fact, the partisan spin is much, much more important.
Facts?I keep forgetting liberals like you dot deal in fact
Blackvegetable » 13 Nov 2024, 8:11 am » wrote: ↑ I cite the filing, you whine a lot of narrative.
Facts?
Are these your whines
"I don't care about that...."
"That's irrelevant..."
"If you don't first validate my lie, I won't acknowledge your fact."
I skewer you with them.
Blackvegetable » 13 Nov 2024, 8:11 am » wrote: ↑ I cite the filing, you whine a lot of narrative.
Facts?
Are these your whines
"I don't care about that...."
"That's irrelevant..."
"If you don't first validate my lie, I won't acknowledge your fact."
I skewer you with them.
You're illiterate.*Beekeeper » 13 Nov 2024, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑ I cited the JURY VERDICT FORM and you DENY THAT, DICKSUCKING PIECE OF MONKEY ****!!!
EVEN POSTED IT FOR YOUR PLEASURE!!
But you sure can suck the BIGGEST DICKS and that's really all you are good at doing.
Yes they are. I gave those answers because my assertion is no jury, in any court anywhere on earth has found that Trump committed rape. Those answers were to questions that had absolutely nothing to do with that assertion.Blackvegetable » 13 Nov 2024, 8:11 am » wrote: ↑ I cite the filing, you whine a lot of narrative.
Facts?
Are these your whines
"I don't care about that...."
"That's irrelevant..."
"If you don't first validate my lie, I won't acknowledge your fact."
I skewer you with them.
That's your conflict to resolve.ConsRule » 13 Nov 2024, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑ Yes they are. I gave those answers because my assertion is no jury, in any court anywhere on earth has found that Trump committed rape. Those answers were to questions that had absolutely nothing to do with that assertion.
Let's take this one step at a time, with easy questions. Was there a jury in the Trump-Carroll trial?
So you refuse to answer a simple yes or no question.Blackvegetable » 13 Nov 2024, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑ That's your conflict to resolve.
You've already been obliged to acknowledge the relevant facts. How you proceed is out of my hands.
:rofl:ConsRule » 13 Nov 2024, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑ So you refuse to answer a simple yes or no question.
Then **** YOU!
We did not go through these questions. What are you scared of?Blackvegetable » 13 Nov 2024, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑![]()
We just went through this.
You must be a Public Christian.
Nothing.ConsRule » 13 Nov 2024, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ We did not go through these questions. What are you scared of?
That's a lie. If you weren't scared you would answer questions.
:rofl:ConsRule » 13 Nov 2024, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑ That's a lie. If you weren't scared you would answer questions.
Yes.Let's take this one step at a time, with easy questions. Was there a jury in the Trump-Carroll trial?