Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑ **** heaped upon ****.
which of you is lying?
https://youtu.be/E1WpGqcGrSw?si=oX3ZZ0cOcU0jFYtW
**** idiot.
What confounds you, Rube?*johnedgarslowhorses » 08 Nov 2024, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑ What kind of a post is this??
@AtticusFinch
@Blackvegetable
In his own words, ******* ****.
Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑ I even bolded, italicized and underlined them.
Ok...if it is about your Vision Thing, describe what you see
Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑ A federal judge in Texas on Thursday struck down a new Biden administration program that sought to provide a path to U.S. citizenship for hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants married to American citizens.
The ruling, issued by Judge J. Campbell Barker of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, came months after 16 Republican-led states, led by Texas’ attorney general, Ken Paxton, filed a lawsuit claiming that the administration lacked the legal authority to enact the program. In August, Judge Barker temporarily blocked the initiative, just days after it had gone into place.
The Biden administration started the initiative, known as Keeping Families Together, in August, allowing undocumented immigrants who were married to U.S. citizens and had been in the United States for 10 years or more a chance to gain a green card without leaving the country.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/07/us/b ... ogram.html
Here we have an effort, led by an AG under indictment, toiling on behalf of a felon, operating under a banner of Law&Order.
It's about upholding the law, of course.
How **** and petty can hypocrites get?
do you not feel any shame playing this stupid?*Huey » 08 Nov 2024, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑ I don't see conflicting assertions on the OP. You will have to be specific and leave yourself no wiggle room.
You're a **** idiot.
Are you on USMB?
Then why post as follows
It was in response to your non topical comment. Not the OP, ****. You truly are not a smart person.Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑ Then why post as follows
So this really isn't about the immigration law. It is about how you can whine about Trump.
But "this" is the OP, lying little tiny..*Huey » 08 Nov 2024, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ It was in response to your non topical comment. Not the OP, ****. You truly are not a smart person.
Blackvegetable » Today, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 7:37 am
You just cast a 3rd vote for a guy who broke the laws duly enacted by the State of New York...
Why would you give a ****?
What is that? The latest cool drug
He was referring to bills that land on his desk....NOT PASSING OUT PERSONAL PAY CHECKS TO EACH AND EVERYONE WHO EVER SET FOOT ON ONE OF HIS JOB SITES...!!!Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑ **** heaped upon ****.
which of you is lying?
https://youtu.be/E1WpGqcGrSw?si=oX3ZZ0cOcU0jFYtW
**** idiot.
The OP is about BIDEN trying to write federal law and a judge blocking him,.Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑ A federal judge in Texas on Thursday struck down a new Biden administration program that sought to provide a path to U.S. citizenship for hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants married to American citizens.
The ruling, issued by Judge J. Campbell Barker of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, came months after 16 Republican-led states, led by Texas’ attorney general, Ken Paxton, filed a lawsuit claiming that the administration lacked the legal authority to enact the program. In August, Judge Barker temporarily blocked the initiative, just days after it had gone into place.
The Biden administration started the initiative, known as Keeping Families Together, in August, allowing undocumented immigrants who were married to U.S. citizens and had been in the United States for 10 years or more a chance to gain a green card without leaving the country.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/07/us/b ... ogram.html
Here we have an effort, led by an AG under indictment, toiling on behalf of a felon, operating under a banner of Law&Order.
It's about upholding the law, of course.
How **** and petty can hypocrites get?
That's not the point, braindead lying piece of ****.GHETTOBLASTER » 08 Nov 2024, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑ He was referring to bills that land on his desk....NOT PASSING OUT PERSONAL PAY CHECKS TO EACH AND EVERYONE WHO EVER SET FOOT ON ONE OF HIS JOB SITES...!!!
No, it isn't.*Huey » 08 Nov 2024, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ The OP is about BIDEN trying to write federal law and a judge blocking him,.
Again, your ambiguous style bites you in the ***.
Get your facts straight before making your assumptionsBlackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ That's not the point, braindead lying piece of ****.
The point is that the illegals were doing his demolition BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT GRIFTY WANTED.
He even MARRIED two illegals.
Unless this contractor was going to eat that cost, he would have needed Grifty's signature.GHETTOBLASTER » 08 Nov 2024, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑ Get your facts straight before making your assumptions
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2 ... illion-hi/
"Sometime between 1979 and 1980, Trump hired a contractor to demolish an old building in midtown Manhattan to make way for Trump Tower. The contractor signed on workers from a local union and, to meet Trump’s tight deadline, also brought on 200 undocumented laborers from Poland dubbed the "Polish Brigade."