I have.*Huey » 14 Nov 2024, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑ Make your case. I’m going to give you the same AP link I have given you before.
what's the date of your link?same AP link I have given you before.
Can you read a JURY VERDICT SHEET??Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑ Do you see quotation marks around those words, Verbal ?
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.*Beekeeper » 14 Nov 2024, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑ AND THAT MEANS, NO RAPE OCCURRED, MONKEYPISS for brains!!
Read NY STATE PENAL CODE ON THE DEFINTION OF RAPE. THAT'S all the COURTS IN NY STATE are allowed to use as a definition of RAPE, DICKHEAD!!
Now, go suck your own cock like you always do and take this CURB STOMPING like the blathering IDIOT YOU ARE!!
**** OFF!!
Don't need them. I can accept facts and reality. Liberals on the other hand, cannot. Most of them are also science deniers.
Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑ I have.
what's the date of your link?
If it predates Kaplan's response to Team Grifty's motion for a reduced award it is entirely irrelevant.
Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑ “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
he's a judge...you're a severely conflicted closet case.

The judge would have clarified in his jury's deliberation instructions what the NY law states in determining the verdict...the fact that he didn't like the verdict having to chime in and change what he said is pure BS...ConsRule » 13 Nov 2024, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑ The rape issue played no part in the award. Even though Trump's legal team used "grope", Kaplan could have focused on other examples of actions that would fall under the Penal Code definition of sexual abuse to justify him denying the motion. However, he chose to ignore (lie) about their verdict on question 1 (where they followed NY law) and redefine the parameters outside of NY law rather than focus on the things actually related to their award.
In your liberal mind...that makes him your hero. In my mind, that makes him a partisan hack.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom *Huey » 13 Nov 2024, 5:18 pm » wrote: ↑ You are not smart enough to make a case. No wonder you majored in 19th Century Russian Studies, Legacy, and live in a shared wall condo.
I am not making your case. Make your case.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom You're a **** idiot, naffy.nefarious101 » 14 Nov 2024, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑ Fake news Dickhead.....Another Russia Russia Russia type hoax
But YOU said in a trial involving a jury, the jury is responsible for rendering the verdict. On the jury verdict form linked below, did the jury find Trump committed rape?Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑ “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
he's a judge...you're a severely conflicted closet case.
*Huey » 13 Nov 2024, 5:32 pm » wrote: ↑LMAO! Learn to not only how to make a case but how to read people.Blackvegetable » 13 Nov 2024, 5:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Remember why you don't answer my questions.
Temperature's risin'
The article is the same one I have posted in the past and mentions how the Judge had to retell the jury findings.
Your turn. I am getting ready for my cruise. I will be back to tomorrow to see if you have a case.
You need to learn how to questions someone. I have made thousands of real cases in my life and most of them were successes. I a talking professionally,
You really suck at this, Legacy.
Note the bold, italicized and underlined sentence from yesterday, ya non reading retard.Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑I have.*Huey » 14 Nov 2024, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑ Make your case. I’m going to give you the same AP link I have given you before.what's the date of your link?same AP link I have given you before.
If it predates Kaplan's response to Team Grifty's motion for a reduced award it is entirely irrelevant.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Cannonpointer » 13 Nov 2024, 9:41 pm » wrote: ↑ They appear because the fellow who makes them appear is smarter than you. He knows how to manipulate the system.
As to money flowing from one account to another, if you're too stupid to understand how that works, after these many years, then you don't deserve to have it explained.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑ Why should I read your **** while you suppress @CP's Battered Uvula ?
Yes, I did...and I suggested we actually consider that verdict..ConsRule » 14 Nov 2024, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑ But YOU said in a trial involving a jury, the jury is responsible for rendering the verdict. On the jury verdict form linked below, did the jury find Trump committed rape?
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/0 ... l-00096059
That's a comment.
Why do you whine so much, Sheilagh*Huey » 14 Nov 2024, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑
Note the bold, italicized and underlined sentence from yesterday, ya non reading retard.
This would go a lot faster if you actually read responses, Tard.
she did fail, brown...hence the resounding NO to question 1...Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑ “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
he's a judge...you're a severely conflicted closet case.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom He's the presiding judge.ROG62 » 14 Nov 2024, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑ she did fail, brown...hence the resounding NO to question 1...