*Beekeeper » 16 Nov 2024, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑ I did. Because you didn't like the answer doesn't mean I didn't answer it, ****!!
The SIMPLE FACT IS..... https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png
NO JURY has EVER found Trump committed any "rape"!!!
Sucks, huh??
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Not only did I prove that you are a pathological liar but also a very stupid pathological liar, too.*GHETTOBLASTER » Yesterday, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 3:14 pm
https://www.snopes.com/news/2023/05/09/ ... ual-abuse/"According to The New York Times, the judge in the case, Lewis A. Kaplan, said that "for the jury to establish that Trump raped Carroll, she had to prove that Trump engaged in sexual intercourse with her, and that he did it without her consent." He said that "sexual intercourse includes 'any penetration of the penis into the vaginal opening.'"While a significant victory for Carroll,
viral headlines or tweets in some cases misrepresented the verdict as one in which Trump was "found guilty of sexually assaulting Carroll," and that resulted in Trump becoming a "a convicted sexual abuser."
Terms like "found guilty" and "convicted" are reserved for criminal cases. This case, which centered on defamation, was a civil proceeding to decide the outcome of a lawsuit against Trump filed by Carroll. These cases do not determine guilt, but do determine "liability" for certain actions. "
Why are you citing yourself....you're a moron.*GHETTOBLASTER » 16 Nov 2024, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑ Not only did I prove that you are a pathological liar but also a very stupid pathological liar, too..
*GHETTOBLASTER » Yesterday, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 16 Nov 2024, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑ Blackvegetable » Today, 3:29 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 3:29 am
Because TRUMP did rape her....
.Show me where I've failed to make the distinction.*GHETTOBLASTER » 16 Nov 2024, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑ *GHETTOBLASTER » Yesterday, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 3:14 pm
https://www.snopes.com/news/2023/05/09/ ... ual-abuse/"According to The New York Times, the judge in the case, Lewis A. Kaplan, said that "for the jury to establish that Trump raped Carroll, she had to prove that Trump engaged in sexual intercourse with her, and that he did it without her consent." He said that "sexual intercourse includes 'any penetration of the penis into the vaginal opening.'"While a significant victory for Carroll,
viral headlines or tweets in some cases misrepresented the verdict as one in which Trump was "found guilty of sexually assaulting Carroll," and that resulted in Trump becoming a "a convicted sexual abuser."
Terms like "found guilty" and "convicted" are reserved for criminal cases. This case, which centered on defamation, was a civil proceeding to decide the outcome of a lawsuit against Trump filed by Carroll. These cases do not determine guilt, but do determine "liability" for certain actions. "
Not only did I prove that you are a pathological liar but a very stupid pathological liar, too..
Blackvegetable » 29 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 16 Nov 2024, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ Show me where I've failed to make the distinction.
Keep looking because it wasn't any "RAPE" that you are trying to claim!!KeeBlackvegetable » 16 Nov 2024, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑ This explains your GED.
I'm looking for what he DID pay $2 million to the plaintiff.
If it "wasn't", stop waxing your gash and answer the question.*Beekeeper » 16 Nov 2024, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Keep looking because it wasn't any "RAPE" that you are trying to claim!!
https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png
Sucks for you!!
This sucks for all toadies.
Blackvegetable » 16 Nov 2024, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑ This sucks for all toadies.
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
You can't spell "woman"
For what DID the jury find him liable?*Huey » 16 Nov 2024, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Just admit the Jury rejected the rape charge. That is all this is about .
You NEVER admit you’re wrong. Another reason your hero dad advised you to exercise your options and stay away from the military.
Something about which you know nothing, yet insist on opining, Projectolass.Another reason your hero dad advised you to exercise your options and stay away from the military
Where's the rest of the verdict form?*Beekeeper » 16 Nov 2024, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Keep looking because it wasn't any "RAPE" that you are trying to claim!!
https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png
Sucks for you!!
Stop with questions that have already been answered, Askholio.Blackvegetable » 16 Nov 2024, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑ For what DID the jury find him liable?
What does the presiding judge say?
Something about which you know nothing, yet insist on opining, Projectolass.
Not until you actually answer those questions.*Huey » 16 Nov 2024, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Stop with questions that have already been answered, Askholio.
you lost, bigly
Blackvegetable » 16 Nov 2024, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Where's the rest of the verdict form?
You're a **** moron.
For what did the jury find the Rapist liable?*Beekeeper » 17 Nov 2024, 7:22 am » wrote: ↑ It was the ONLY question for the jury that said RAPE, DICKSUCKER!!
Nod.
ANYTHING else isn't rape, so who cares. YOU are obsessed with "rape", so we only need to be concerned with the NO that the JURY said on the ONLY "rape" question on their verdict form.
Stop being a ****** and answer the question.*Beekeeper » 17 Nov 2024, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑ NOT rape.
That's all you need to know. It wasn't RAPE!!