The judge can't play stupid ****** games.*Beekeeper » 17 Nov 2024, 8:02 am » wrote: ↑ I did. Because you don't like the answer doesn't mean I need to do anything more.
Blackvegetable » 16 Nov 2024, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Not until you actually answer those questions.
It isn't about what you think.
It's about what the jury found Grifty liable for, and the presiding judge's confirmation.
Why do I get an "L" because the Record clearly shows that I am correct?
Because the jury SPECIFICALLY REJECTED the rape claim. And this is about the Jury FINDING, bit the judges interpretation of finding. That is why you get the L.Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑ Why do I get an "L" because the Record clearly shows that I am correct?
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
How do you "win"?
Tiny, stop.*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑ Because the jury SPECIFICALLY REJECTED the rape claim. And this is about the Jury FINDING, bit the judges interpretation of finding. That is why you get the L.
When a credible source shows PRIOR to the Judges interpretation that the jury had a finding of rape then You claim victory.
already asked and already andpswered. numerous **** times. I will give you a hint. It wasn’t RAPE, PFC.Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑ Tiny, stop.
For what DID the jury find Grifty liable?
Then shut up and savor the flavor of your L*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑ already asked and already andpswered. numerous **** times. I will give you a hint. It wasn’t RAPE, PFC.
Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑ Then shut up and savor the flavor of your L
The judge can't cherry pick....he can't ignore what the jury actually found.
You must...
What DID they find him liable for?*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑ No, Retard, idiot, coward, you can’t reframe the discussion because you got spanked.
When asked directly about rape the Judy SPECIFICALLY said no.
Don’t bother me with your spin and BS with this any more.
Case closed and you lost. To me, again.
*Beekeeper » 17 Nov 2024, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑ His OPINION isn't what the jury found DICKBREATH, and he even STATED AS MUCH in his "opinion".
Now, try to keep up with the FACTS that NO JURY FOUND TRUMP GUILTY OF ANY RAPE!!
https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png
Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑ What DID they find him liable for?
The judge has debunked your article of faith.
Let's stick to the facts.
You CANNOT win by running.
It is over, Loser.Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑ You CANNOT win by running.
Only by making a case.
You can't.
*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑ It is over, Loser.
I made my case. AYou lied and diverted. THIS WAS ALWAYS ABOUT WHAT THE JURY FOUND. NOT THE JUDGES Interpretation.
You're a moron.THIS WAS ALWAYS ABOUT WHAT THE JURY FOUND. NOT THE JUDGES Interpretation.
@ConsRule
Like whipped menials...JohnnyYou » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ @ConsRule
This is their most watched topic.. Looks like the MAGA Buyer's remorse kicked in around 18 Oct 2025 and theyz gave up..
Lurking in the Profiles... Oh my.. How Horrid!
Another classic.Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑ I don’t give a ****. That is your case to make. I made mine. The jury SPECIFICALLY Rejected rape. After you acknowledge that you can then make your case.
The Kosta Living is worth the watch.. Ivanka loves her new 1400 Hectare Mediterranean Island.