Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2024, 8:35 am

Do you think there will be a price tag to anything Grifty does, Deficit Hawk?

You people are the dumbest **** alive.

Did you complain even once about how Biden wasted trillions by throwing it at the hoax of "climate change", the losing effort in Ukraine, the policies to pay illegals with debit cards, free healthcare, free education, free travel, free hotel rooms, free food, free tranny surgeries for convicted felons, and free smartphones, or the tens of millions he wasted by having his corrupt DOJ and FBI raid Trump's home and hold kangaroo courts to file **** lawfare charges against him that are now all being thrown out?

Sorry dickhead, but you've LOST the credibility to complain about any spending that will be done by Trump in the future!
Check your watch, because it's time you SHUT THE **** UP, LOSER!!    
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 08 Nov 2024, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2024, 10:04 am

Get your facts straight before making your  assumptions
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2 ... illion-hi/
"Sometime between 1979 and 1980, Trump hired a contractor to demolish an old building in midtown Manhattan to make way for Trump Tower. The contractor signed on workers from a local union and, to meet Trump’s tight deadline, also brought on 200 undocumented laborers from Poland dubbed the "Polish Brigade."

So **** stupid.

Trump Paid Over $1 Million in Labor Settlement, Documents Reveal

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/27/nyre ... roid-share

Mr. Trump would later testify that he never walked into the adjoining building or noticed the Polish workers. But a foreman on the job, Zbignew Goryn, testified that Mr. Trump visited the site, marveling to him about the Polish crew.

“He liked the way the men were working on 57th Street,” Mr. Goryn said. “He said, ‘Those Polish guys are good, hard workers.’”
 
**** slack jawed rube.

Zeets2 » 08 Nov 2024, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2024, 10:15 am

Did you complain even once about how Biden wasted trillions by throwing it at the hoax of "climate change", the losing effort in Ukraine, the policies to pay illegals with debit cards, free healthcare, free education, free travel, free hotel rooms, free food, free tranny surgeries for convicted felons, and free smartphones, or the tens of millions he wasted by having his corrupt DOJ and FBI raid Trump's home and hold kangaroo courts to file **** lawfare charges against him that are now all being thrown out?

Sorry dickhead, but you've LOST the credibility to complain about any spending that will be done by Trump in the future!
Check your watch, because it's time you SHUT THE **** UP, LOSER!!  

There will be zero informational value in that spew.

Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2024, 10:02 am

No, it isn't.

You can't read....what floats before your eyes finds no traction because you have no capacity for comprehension.

Shrug.

Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2024, 10:20 am

There will be zero informational value in that spew.

Only to Trump haters like you who have no problem ignoring FACTS!
 

Zeets2 » 08 Nov 2024, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2024, 10:24 am

Only to Trump haters like you who have no problem ignoring FACTS!

There will be no facts...

You're too stupid and lazy..
 

*Huey » 08 Nov 2024, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2024, 10:21 am

Shrug.

Ask @*VegasVagina to help you figure it out.

Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2024, 10:26 am

Ask @*VegasVagina to help you figure it out.

YAWN

*Huey » 08 Nov 2024, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2024, 10:35 am

yap..

FIFY
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2024, 10:25 am

There will be no facts...
 

Obviously, since you never let them enter your head!
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2024, 10:36 am

FIFY

You don't want to get into a game of completely editing posts.  

*Huey » 08 Nov 2024, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2024, 10:50 am

You don't want to get into a game of completely editing posts.

Are you any better at that than running from your own words, Verbal?

Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2024, 10:58 am

Are you any better at that than running from your own words, Verbal?

I didn't run from my words.  I even reposted them for you.  I do notice that you are better at lying than you are stating facts.

*Huey » 08 Nov 2024, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2024, 11:08 am

I didn't run from my words.  I even reposted them for you.  I do notice that you are better at lying than you are stating facts.

It's not about you selectively rebleating...

It is about you making sense of the ****.

Which you either cannot, or will not, do
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2024, 11:11 am

It's not about you selectively rebleating...

It is about you making sense of the ****.

Which you either cannot, or will not, do

Let's get real.  You are a troll who is only here to **** with people who support conservative ideology and voted for trump.  That is what you said seven years ago.  You rarely read what is posted to you.  You have no understanding of issues other than what you are told to think.  You start **** that you can't finish.  You are intentionally ambiguous and vague so you can wiggle out of what you say.  You don't take stands. 

Basically, you are just a ****. 

Nod.    

*Huey » 08 Nov 2024, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2024, 11:24 am

Let's get real.  You are a troll who is only here to **** with people who support conservative ideology and voted for trump.  That is what you said seven years ago.  You rarely read what is posted to you.  You have no understanding of issues other than what you are told to think.  You start **** that you can't finish.  You are intentionally ambiguous and vague so you can wiggle out of what you say.  You don't take stands. 

Basically, you are just a ****. 

Nod.  

But it isn't about me...

You just make it so because you don't understand OPs..

You are intentionally ambiguous and vague so you can wiggle out of what you say.  You don't take stands. 

This is complete and utter ****.

It is also blatant projection. 

Would you like to see?

Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 7:22 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2024, 7:22 am

Yes...

And another judge has defined Grifty as a rapist..

Huge difference.  Just in case you're too stupid to understand it...the judge commenting on the case at the center of this thread did so in an official court ruling.  The judge in the Trump case put his definition, which went against NY law at the time of the offense and his comment, did so as an opinion in an news article.

One carries the weight of law...the other only carries weight to whiny *** liberals who are too big a sissy to tolerate a jury verdict.

ConsRule » 08 Nov 2024, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2024, 11:33 am

Huge difference.  Just in case you're too stupid to understand it...the judge commenting on the case at the center of this thread did so in an official court ruling.  The judge in the Trump case put his definition, which went against NY law at the time of the offense and his comment, did so as an opinion in an news article.

One carries the weight of law...the other only carries weight to whiny *** liberals who are too big a sissy to tolerate a jury verdict.

You're not going to defend this crap, so I won't bother reading it.

Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2024, 11:28 am

But it isn't about me...

You just make it so because you don't understand OPs..

This is complete and utter ****.

It is also blatant projection. 

Would you like to see?

As the Tuco would when it is time to shoot, shoot.  Stop talking.  You talk and ask way too many questions.

In more modern speech, just **** do it.  

Your **** OPs are vague and ambiguous where most people don't know what the **** you are blabbering.  And you blame everyone else for your idiocy.

 

Blackvegetable » 08 Nov 2024, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

08 Nov 2024, 11:36 am

You're not going to defend this crap, so I won't bother reading it.

That's your choice.  I would be happy to defend both (even though the first has already been cited by others), but you're to immature to understand and accept a jury verdict.