Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Happy Suckers and Losers Day.
Happy Suckers and Losers Day.
By Squatchman
11 Nov 2024 10:49 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
4 Dec 2024 7:46 am
Tell us BV...
He left the Trump administration the end of 2018...
Why did he wait FIVE YEARS to say "suckers and losers?
Why??
Cause he's just repeating what he heard The Atlantic publish..
Why not say something in 2020 when Trump was running for reelection?
HUH??
C'mon
Explain to us why he waited FIVE YEARS and never claimed he heard Trump SAY those words
He left the Trump administration the end of 2018...
Why did he wait FIVE YEARS to say "suckers and losers?
Why??
Cause he's just repeating what he heard The Atlantic publish..
Why not say something in 2020 when Trump was running for reelection?
HUH??
C'mon
Explain to us why he waited FIVE YEARS and never claimed he heard Trump SAY those words
4 Dec 2024 7:47 am
Why does it matter?AtticusFinch » 04 Dec 2024, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑ Hey BV...
Just wondering
Why did Kelly wait FIVE YEARS ??
4 Dec 2024 7:47 am
The AtlanticBlackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑ ****.
‘it doesn’t look good for me.’
That's a Direct Quote, Illiterate Hole.
"sources were anonymous"...
But suddenly you believe Kelly who waited FIVE YEARS and never actually heard Trump say that?
Odd how Kelly said Trump should be removed from office yeard earlier but NEVER said the "losers and suckers" quote...
.....
4 Dec 2024 7:48 am
Start answering questions, ****.AtticusFinch » 04 Dec 2024, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑ Tell us BV...
He left the Trump administration the end of 2018...
Why did he wait FIVE YEARS to say "suckers and losers?
Why??
Cause he's just repeating what he heard The Atlantic publish..
Why not say something in 2020 when Trump was running for reelection?
HUH??
C'mon
Explain to us why he waited FIVE YEARS and never claimed he heard Trump SAY those words
Why are the words in bold inside quotation marks?
4 Dec 2024 7:50 am
Why did Kelly wait FIVE YEARS?Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑ Start answering questions, ****.
Why are the words in bold inside quotation marks?
Why not say something when Trump supposely said those words?
Cause he never said them..
All Kelly is doing is repeating The Atlantic article which was made on "anonymous sources"...
4 Dec 2024 7:50 am
Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑ Start answering questions, ****.
Why are the words in bold inside quotation marks?
I don't understand why other posters bother to **** with you......I dismissed you as a lunatic long ago.
4 Dec 2024 7:51 am
That's how it works, child.AtticusFinch » 04 Dec 2024, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑ The Atlantic
"sources were anonymous"...
But suddenly you believe Kelly who waited FIVE YEARS and never actually heard Trump say that?
It has ALWAYS worked that way, child.
The idiots who told you that it means anything do the very same thing...except FOX is satisfied with an uncorroborated source.
How many hours, Hole?
4 Dec 2024 7:52 am
You're among the dumbest crackers alive, Polk Salad.RebelGator » 04 Dec 2024, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑ I don't understand why other posters bother to **** with you......I dismissed you as a lunatic long ago.
4 Dec 2024 7:53 am
Answer the question, ****.AtticusFinch » 04 Dec 2024, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑ Why did Kelly wait FIVE YEARS?
Why not say something when Trump supposely said those words?
Cause he never said them..
All Kelly is doing is repeating The Atlantic article which was made on "anonymous sources"...
4 Dec 2024 7:53 am
Goldberg’s smear piece is in line with his 2020 lie, the “suckers and loser” hoax that was also heavily rebutted by nearly everyone involved, which he originated late in the election season as well. Conveniently, Democrats have since been rolling that hoax out every time Trump mentions the military, as they did again in the aftermath of Trump attending the Arlington National Cemetery ceremony.
As my colleague Jordan Boyd wrote, “Nearly two dozen Trump White House officials debunked the hit piece, which only received ‘confirmation’ from one source outside of Goldberg.” In the same way, Goldberg’s newest screed is thinly sourced and relies on anonymous testimony while ignoring or devaluing on-the-record statements.
As my colleague Jordan Boyd wrote, “Nearly two dozen Trump White House officials debunked the hit piece, which only received ‘confirmation’ from one source outside of Goldberg.” In the same way, Goldberg’s newest screed is thinly sourced and relies on anonymous testimony while ignoring or devaluing on-the-record statements.
4 Dec 2024 7:58 am
AtticusFinch » 04 Dec 2024, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑ Goldberg’s smear piece is in line with his 2020 lie, the “suckers and loser” hoax that was also heavily rebutted by nearly everyone involved, which he originated late in the election season as well. Conveniently, Democrats have since been rolling that hoax out every time Trump mentions the military, as they did again in the aftermath of Trump attending the Arlington National Cemetery ceremony.
As my colleague Jordan Boyd wrote, “Nearly two dozen Trump White House officials debunked the hit piece, which only received ‘confirmation’ from one source outside of Goldberg.” In the same way, Goldberg’s newest screed is thinly sourced and relies on anonymous testimony while ignoring or devaluing on-the-record statements.
Are these Federalist punks calling Marine Corps General Kelly a "liar", in the service of a rapist felon?
4 Dec 2024 7:59 am
So BV..
You want us to believe in 2018 Kelly heard Trump say these words but waited FIVE YEARS to mention it..
And when he did he never confirmed he was there....??
On top of that he NEVER said anything in 2020 after he had left the Trump adminsitration and Trump was up for reelection...?
And on top of that the "anonymous" source shows up a few weeks before the 2020 election and the Atlantic runs the article on it?
What editor in 2020 would write an entire article on an anonymous sources claim?
.....And do it right before a presidential election..
And just a few weeks ago the same guy writes another article on "sources" that claimed Trump said something about a murdered soldier?
And the murdered soldier's own family said it was a lie..
The Atlantic is owned by a friend of Kamala Harris BTW....
You want us to believe in 2018 Kelly heard Trump say these words but waited FIVE YEARS to mention it..
And when he did he never confirmed he was there....??
On top of that he NEVER said anything in 2020 after he had left the Trump adminsitration and Trump was up for reelection...?
And on top of that the "anonymous" source shows up a few weeks before the 2020 election and the Atlantic runs the article on it?
What editor in 2020 would write an entire article on an anonymous sources claim?
.....And do it right before a presidential election..
And just a few weeks ago the same guy writes another article on "sources" that claimed Trump said something about a murdered soldier?
And the murdered soldier's own family said it was a lie..
The Atlantic is owned by a friend of Kamala Harris BTW....
4 Dec 2024 8:16 am
Goldberg’s smear piece is in line with his 2020 lie, the “suckers and loser” hoax that was also heavily rebutted by nearly everyone involved, which he originated late in the election season as well. Conveniently, Democrats have since been rolling that hoax out every time Trump mentions the military, as they did again in the aftermath of Trump attending the Arlington National Cemetery ceremony.
As my colleague Jordan Boyd wrote, “Nearly two dozen Trump White House officials debunked the hit piece, which only received ‘confirmation’ from one source outside of Goldberg.” In the same way, Goldberg’s newest screed is thinly sourced and relies on anonymous testimony while ignoring or devaluing on-the-record statements.
Goldberg also appears to have invented out of thin air a denial from Meadows spokesman Ben Williamson, saying that Meadows “denied having heard Trump make the statement.” In reality, Meadows said Trump “absolutely did not say that.”
As my colleague Jordan Boyd wrote, “Nearly two dozen Trump White House officials debunked the hit piece, which only received ‘confirmation’ from one source outside of Goldberg.” In the same way, Goldberg’s newest screed is thinly sourced and relies on anonymous testimony while ignoring or devaluing on-the-record statements.
Goldberg also appears to have invented out of thin air a denial from Meadows spokesman Ben Williamson, saying that Meadows “denied having heard Trump make the statement.” In reality, Meadows said Trump “absolutely did not say that.”
4 Dec 2024 8:44 am
Weeks ahead of the 2020 election, Goldberg claimed that during a trip to Paris in 2018, Trump called fallen soldiers "suckers" and "losers."
Despite its liberal skew, even Snopes acknowledged there was "no evidence of an audio or video recording of the remarks in question, nor was there any documentation, such as transcripts or presidential notes, to independently confirm or deny the alleged quotes' authenticity."
Blaze News senior editor for politics Christopher Bedford noted shortly after Goldberg's 2020 hit piece debuted that Goldberg had centered his piece on "secondary-source rumor-mongering" even though it was contradicted by substantial primary sources, including both people and documents.
Natalie Khawam, the attorney for the Guillén family quoted in the Atlantic hit piece, characterized Goldberg as a liar."After having dealt with hundreds of reporters in my legal career, this is unfortunately the first time I have to go on record and call out Jeffrey Goldberg," wrote Khawam. "Not only did he misrepresent our conversation but he outright LIED in HIS sensational story. More importantly, he used and exploited my clients, and Vanessa Guillen's murder ... for cheap political gain."
Despite its liberal skew, even Snopes acknowledged there was "no evidence of an audio or video recording of the remarks in question, nor was there any documentation, such as transcripts or presidential notes, to independently confirm or deny the alleged quotes' authenticity."
Blaze News senior editor for politics Christopher Bedford noted shortly after Goldberg's 2020 hit piece debuted that Goldberg had centered his piece on "secondary-source rumor-mongering" even though it was contradicted by substantial primary sources, including both people and documents.
Natalie Khawam, the attorney for the Guillén family quoted in the Atlantic hit piece, characterized Goldberg as a liar."After having dealt with hundreds of reporters in my legal career, this is unfortunately the first time I have to go on record and call out Jeffrey Goldberg," wrote Khawam. "Not only did he misrepresent our conversation but he outright LIED in HIS sensational story. More importantly, he used and exploited my clients, and Vanessa Guillen's murder ... for cheap political gain."
4 Dec 2024 9:23 am
4 Dec 2024 9:24 am
4 Dec 2024 9:32 am
Who heard him say it?
Just answer ..
WHO?
Cause the guy that wrote the article admitted he has no idea
4 Dec 2024 11:20 am
How about you OWN my BOOT UP YOUR PIECE OF MAGGOT **** ***!!!
HE NEVER SAID IT!!
PERIOD!!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
4 Dec 2024 11:46 am
It's been 6 years....*Beekeeper » 04 Dec 2024, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑ How about you OWN my BOOT UP YOUR PIECE OF MAGGOT **** ***!!!
HE NEVER SAID IT!!
PERIOD!!!
Nobody has ever come forward and claimed they heard Trump say it ..
The Atlantic editor admits it was anonymous and he has no idea who ....
4 Dec 2024 11:50 am
AtticusFinch » 04 Dec 2024, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑ It's been 6 years....
Nobody has ever come forward and claimed they heard Trump say it ..
The Atlantic editor admits it was anonymous and he has no idea who ....
These moronic **** stains will fall for any damn thing their propagandists put under their noses.
THAT'S how **** STUPID they are. And they CLAIM that they are "the smartest people in the nation" and still, regurgitate PURE **** like this.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
Who is online
In total there are 3492 users online :: 4 registered, 16 bots, and 3472 guests
Bots: DuckDuckGo, DuckDuckBot, CensysInspect, proximic, Bolt, Firefox/7.0, ADmantX, CriteoBot, YandexBot, MicroMessenger, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, bingbot, facebookexternalhit, Applebot, curl/7