Economic Growth vs. Conservation

Vegas » 12 Nov 2024, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑
12 Nov 2024, 2:03 pm
It's impossible for any nation to grow their economy without some form of industrialism or innovations. Thus, the carbon footprint will always be an issue. On one hand, third world countries want to progress to a more developed economy and overall quality of life. Industrial pursuits are the only way to accomplish this. India and Africa have some of the most impoverished populations that have little to no access to the basic needs. Some nations are so desperate for clean water that they will compost their toilets to use for soil enrichment, thus omitting the need to flush. In developed nations, we literally play in water-water parks. However, these nations cannot develop unless we use technology that will impact the environment and ecology.

So, do we help people survive or do we help the planet instead?

It can be "Done" The United States Of America a Gr8 example..

After WW2 Europe was bombed out and scooping away the Rubble..

Bretton Woods Pact "Solidified" the USA DOLLAR all pact & Trade Currency

In "Return" we helped Re-Build Europe and Established "NATO" Treaty.

At the Same Time "Soviet Russia" who we also "Funded" and supplied weapons during World War 2 they split away went back to Socialism/ Communism after the Gr8 War & split away started "Commecon" Block of Socialist Nations mostly in "Eastern Europe"

Liberal Forum

Who is online