Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 13 Nov 2024, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

13 Nov 2024, 10:34 am

My prediction...

Grifty's cabinet will include more FOX alums than graduates of Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford and the University of Chicago - COMBINED.

He is literally picking people he's "seen on TV".

Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Deal:

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Veghead pretending to be superior followed by him getting his *** handed to him:
Master Vegetable's MAGAt Moron Challenge! or Why Blackvegetable Is Much Better Than You, Bish! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room



BlackVegtable justifies my repeated survivorship bias question. Does his stupidity know any bounds? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Mar 2026, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2026, 11:32 am

Pentagon bars press photographers over ‘unflattering’ Hegseth photos
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s staff took issue with images taken in a rare briefing last week and decided to shut out photographers from two subsequent news conferences.

Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Deal:

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Veghead pretending to be superior followed by him getting his *** handed to him:
Master Vegetable's MAGAt Moron Challenge! or Why Blackvegetable Is Much Better Than You, Bish! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room



BlackVegtable justifies my repeated survivorship bias question. Does his stupidity know any bounds? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
 
 
 

Vegas » 11 Mar 2026, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2026, 11:37 am

Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Deal:

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Veghead pretending to be superior followed by him getting his *** handed to him:
Master Vegetable's MAGAt Moron Challenge! or Why Blackvegetable Is Much Better Than You, Bish! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room



BlackVegtable justifies my repeated survivorship bias question. Does his stupidity know any bounds? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Blackvegetable » 11 Mar 2026, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2026, 11:46 am

 

No idea what that's about. Nor do I care. 


Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Deal:

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Veghead pretending to be superior followed by him getting his *** handed to him:
Master Vegetable's MAGAt Moron Challenge! or Why Blackvegetable Is Much Better Than You, Bish! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room



BlackVegtable justifies my repeated survivorship bias question. Does his stupidity know any bounds? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
 

Vegas » 11 Mar 2026, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2026, 12:05 pm

No idea what that's about. Nor do I care. 

Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Deal:

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Veghead pretending to be superior followed by him getting his *** handed to him:
Master Vegetable's MAGAt Moron Challenge! or Why Blackvegetable Is Much Better Than You, Bish! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room



BlackVegtable justifies my repeated survivorship bias question. Does his stupidity know any bounds? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Blackvegetable » 13 Nov 2024, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

13 Nov 2024, 10:34 am

My prediction...

Grifty's cabinet will include more FOX alums than graduates of Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford and the University of Chicago - COMBINED.


He is literally picking people he's "seen on TV".

 

Do you remember what Obama did during the election cycle in 2008?

Blackvegetable » 11 Mar 2026, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2026, 12:27 pm

 

               You think this, whatever the hell it is, will stop the question? Not a chance. But it will clog up your threads as much as I mine do. So go for it. 




Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Deal:

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Veghead pretending to be superior followed by him getting his *** handed to him:
Master Vegetable's MAGAt Moron Challenge! or Why Blackvegetable Is Much Better Than You, Bish! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room



BlackVegtable justifies my repeated survivorship bias question. Does his stupidity know any bounds? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
 
 

Vegas » 11 Mar 2026, 1:08 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2026, 1:08 pm

               You think this, whatever the hell it is, will stop the question? Not a chance. But it will clog up your threads as much as I mine do. So go for it. 

Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Deal:

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Veghead pretending to be superior followed by him getting his *** handed to him:
Master Vegetable's MAGAt Moron Challenge! or Why Blackvegetable Is Much Better Than You, Bish! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room



BlackVegtable justifies my repeated survivorship bias question. Does his stupidity know any bounds? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Blackvegetable » 11 Mar 2026, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2026, 1:14 pm

Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Deal:

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Veghead pretending to be superior followed by him getting his *** handed to him:
Master Vegetable's MAGAt Moron Challenge! or Why Blackvegetable Is Much Better Than You, Bish! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room



BlackVegtable justifies my repeated survivorship bias question. Does his stupidity know any bounds? - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Nov 2024, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

13 Nov 2024, 10:34 am

My prediction...

Grifty's cabinet will include more FOX alums than graduates of Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford and the University of Chicago - COMBINED.

He is literally picking people he's "seen on TV".

Trump, Hegseth clashed at Camp David over Iran missile depletion concerns

At a Camp David summit this weekend, President Trump demanded answers from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over extreme munitions shortages.

Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2026, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Aug 2026, 7:12 pm

Trump, Hegseth clashed at Camp David over Iran missile depletion concerns

At a Camp David summit this weekend, President Trump demanded answers from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over extreme munitions shortages.

Isn't that how things actually work between leaderships demanding results and fellowships cannot live up to those expectations tomorrow since relative time logistics work against actual time evolving with heart beats and individual brains adapting in space at the same time regardless which longitude and latitude, ancestral lineage, generation gap, genetic form currently displaced.

It ^^^^ was a rhetorical question used as a statement, not an inquiry. could also be called intellectual syllogism, social sarcasm.
the social relationship between Trump commander in chief and Hegseth is rank in the cabinet of the executive branch of this republic. Trump suggests what is wanted accomplished, Hegseth tells the president what the military needs to complete the task.

two polar points of socially engineered tomorrows in series parallel time that haven't balanced out yet. Your mind only defines things in logistical frame of mind, not a brain adapting in plain sight by heart beats added since personally conceived.

Grift Bourbon is 250 Proof..

And 3" footlongs are available..
 

Johnny You » 06 Aug 2026, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2026, 9:53 am

Grift Bourbon is 250 Proof..

And 3" footlongs are available..
 

there is no such result as 250 proof. 200 proof is 100% alcohol.

sole » 06 Aug 2026, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2026, 11:14 am

there is no such result as 250 proof. 200 proof is 100% alcohol.

The grift goes on yadda yadda dee

A 3" footlong is a little short too.


 

Johnny You » 06 Aug 2026, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2026, 11:55 am

The grift goes on yadda yadda dee

A 3" footlong is a little short too.


 

you debate separate forms of speculating life beyond living in your own skin, equally inhabiting space, now.

sole » 06 Aug 2026, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2026, 12:47 pm

you debate separate forms of speculating life beyond living in your own skin, equally inhabiting space, now.

For your infoatainment. 12 is greater than 3. 

Haiku Booleans
Game of lesser of evils
Devil wrote the rules?
 
 
 

Johnny You » 06 Aug 2026, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2026, 12:51 pm

For your infoatainment. 12 is greater than 3. 

Haiku Booleans
Game of lesser of evils
Devil wrote the rules?
 
 
 

12 states of 50 isn't the whole United States of America either. 49 are on the northern continent and the 50th is an series of volcanic Islands in the pacific ocean. the 49th is separated between 48 and Canada.

Blackvegetable » 13 Nov 2024, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

13 Nov 2024, 10:34 am

My prediction...

Grifty's cabinet will include more FOX alums than graduates of Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford and the University of Chicago - COMBINED.

He is literally picking people he's "seen on TV".

Increasingly, however, it is becoming clear that in terms of the profundity of the damage they have done to the United States, the sheer scope and scale of their manifold failures, the degree to which they are despised by those they are supposed to be leading, and the urgency with which we should all demand their removal from office, that no one compares to our posturing, vapid, incompetencemaxxing Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth.


https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-worst ... s-history/

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2026, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2026, 3:06 pm

Increasingly, however, it is becoming clear that in terms of the profundity of the damage they have done to the United States, the sheer scope and scale of their manifold failures, the degree to which they are despised by those they are supposed to be leading, and the urgency with which we should all demand their removal from office, that no one compares to our posturing, vapid, incompetencemaxxing Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-worst ... s-history/

Do you have any idea what TPS is?  It's a genius acronym from @nefarious101   His Furrymess is furious.
 
 

JohnnyYou » 08 Aug 2026, 5:20 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2026, 5:20 am

Do you have any idea what TPS is?  It's a genius acronym from @nefarious101   His Furrymess is furious.

I can only be certain that Naffy is an idiot.