Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 6:14 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 6:14 am

More "street repartee"?

Matt Gaetz for AG.

 

Grifty is a moron.

It doesn't matter whom is sworn in for AG ....
The Majority want The DOJ gutted and that is what will happen ...
So get used to it ....
Because all of your impotent  Criticism will not change what's coming ....
because whomever is sworn in WILL be MAGA....



 

*Huey » 14 Nov 2024, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 10:26 am

He wasn’t AWOL nor did he desert.  You really need to stay away from any discussion involving military matters.  They make you look dumber than normal.

Tiny,

Stay out of the weeds.


 

Majik » 14 Nov 2024, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 10:38 am

It doesn't matter whom is sworn in for AG ....
The Majority want The DOJ gutted and that is what will happen ...
So get used to it ....
Because all of your impotent  Criticism will not change what's coming ....
because whomever is sworn in WILL be MAGA....

 

matter whom is sworn

Tovarish,

I'm noticing this tic.

Remember the rule - "to be" ALWAYS takes the nominative case.


cc: @*HooooeyVagina

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 10:39 am

Tiny,

Stay out of the weeds.

 The progressive dream is dead 
 


https://finance.yahoo.com/news/the-prog ... 14935.html

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 10:39 am

Tiny,

Stay out of the weeds.

I will make my case.

The only way to be charged with desertion is to be AWOL for 30 days or more.  AWOL is charge under the UCMJ.  (Google it).  The UCMJ is federal code.  In order to be charged under the UCMJ you have to be either active duty or FEDERALIZED. 

So no, no AWOL means no Desertion.  Just for the record Kerry himself requested early discharge as did Bush.  

Options, I told you to stay out of military matters.  You don't listen.

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 10:41 am

Tovarish,

I'm noticing this tic.

Remember the rule - "to be" ALWAYS takes the nominative case.

cc: @*HooooeyVagina

Progressivivism is Dead

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/the-prog ... 14935.html
 

*Huey » 14 Nov 2024, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 10:45 am

I will make my case.

The only way to be charged with desertion is to be AWOL for 30 days or more.  AWOL is charge under the UCMJ.  (Google it).  The UCMJ is federal code.  In order to be charged under the UCMJ you have to be either active duty or FEDERALIZED. 

So no, no AWOL means no Desertion.  Just for the record Kerry himself requested early discharge as did Bush.  

Options, I told you to stay out of military matters.  You don't listen.

You've offered a series of assertions, at least one of which is false.

Bush remained obligated to train with his Texas unit or to perform substitute training elsewhere each month.[32] On September 5, 1972, he requested permission to "perform equivalent duty" at the 187th Tactical Reconnaissance Group in Alabama "for the months of September, October, and November." He did not receive approval to do so, though his commanding officer recommended he be granted permission. He would have reported to Lieutenant Colonel William Turnipseed, the base commander, for drills on October 7 and 8, and November 4 and 5 (the September drill dates of the unit had already passed). Bush's grandfather, former U.S. Senator Prescott Bush, died of cancer on October 8, and Bush served as a pallbearer at the funeral in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Turnipseed has said that he could not recall whether Bush reported on those occasions


Don't run your taint scrubber, Sheilagh.

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 10:52 am

You've offered a series of assertions, at least one of which is false.

Bush remained obligated to train with his Texas unit or to perform substitute training elsewhere each month.[32] On September 5, 1972, he requested permission to "perform equivalent duty" at the 187th Tactical Reconnaissance Group in Alabama "for the months of September, October, and November." He did not receive approval to do so, though his commanding officer recommended he be granted permission. He would have reported to Lieutenant Colonel William Turnipseed, the base commander, for drills on October 7 and 8, and November 4 and 5 (the September drill dates of the unit had already passed). Bush's grandfather, former U.S. Senator Prescott Bush, died of cancer on October 8, and Bush served as a pallbearer at the funeral in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Turnipseed has said that he could not recall whether Bush reported on those occasions

Don't run your taint scrubber, Sheilagh.

This is about whether he was AWOL.  He was not AWOL which means he could not be a Deserter.

Nod. 

You are getting as stupid on this as you did with the non rape verdict.

Majik » 14 Nov 2024, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 10:47 am

Progressivivism is Dead

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/the-prog ... 14935.html

Koneshno, durak.

*Huey » 14 Nov 2024, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 10:54 am

This is about whether he was AWOL.  He was not AWOL which means he could not be a Deserter.

Nod. 

You are getting as stupid on this as you did with the non rape verdict.

You had the facts wrong, Tiny...

And Scrub WAS Absent, lacking leave.

You don't know the details....again.

Because you are a moron.
 

Vegas » 14 Nov 2024, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 10:22 am

Still evading the question . 

And this moron thinks he is entitled to answers to his questions. Piece of ****.

DP a goat...patch **** up between you...


 

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 10:56 am

You had the facts wrong, Tiny...

And Scrub WAS Absent, lacking leave.

You don't know the details....again.

Because you are a moron.

Whether he was or not has never been proven.  And the LTC doesn't recall.

You called him a deserter,  You can't be a deserter unless you are AWOL.  And unless you are federalized you can't be charged with AWOL.

Stop changing the facts.  I will repost your lie.

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 5:59 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 5:59 am

For whom did you vote in 2004?
The Silver Star guy or the deserter?

**** idiot.

Rube on.

Your "deserter" lie.

*Huey » 14 Nov 2024, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 10:54 am

This is about whether he was AWOL.  He was not AWOL which means he could not be a Deserter.

Nod. 

You are getting as stupid on this as you did with the non rape verdict.

You are getting as stupid on this as you did with the non rape verdict.

Which of us got the judgement figure correct?

Who is yapping at the presiding judge?

Remember, you're a moron.

 

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 11:09 am

Which of us got the judgement figure correct?

Who is yapping at the presiding judge?

Remember, you're a moron.

Ah, go back to the other thread.  But it wasn't you.  It was the jury verdict.

You are not well today.

*Huey » 14 Nov 2024, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 11:09 am

Your "deserter" lie.

You lost that.

What do they call the lowliest conscript if he is absent, and he doesn't have leave?

AWOL.

What if he just blows it off completely?

Deserter.

What do you call the lowliest conscript if he is found to have digitally penetrated another without consent?

Rapist.

THOSE are Facts.
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 11:13 am

You lost that.

What do they call the lowliest conscript if he is absent, and he doesn't have leave?

AWOL.

What if he just blows it off completely?

Deserter.

What do you call the lowliest conscript if he is found to have digitally penetrated another without consent?

Rapist.

THOSE are Facts.

Again, AWOL is a USMJ charge.  That is federal code.  Unless you are federalized and under federal command you can't be charged under the UCMJ.

Reservists and National Guard Members

Reservists and National Guard members also come under the jurisdiction of the UCMJ, albeit under certain circumstances.

Specifically, when these members are on federal Title 10 active duty orders, they are subject to the same legal standards and disciplinary actions as their full-time active-duty counterparts.

https://ucmj.us/who-is-not-subject-to-u ... unterparts.


Options, just stop.  You are looking more foolish with each post.

*Huey » 14 Nov 2024, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 11:16 am

Again, AWOL is a USMJ charge.  That is federal code.  Unless you are federalized and under federal command you can't be charged under the UCMJ.

Reservists and National Guard Members

Reservists and National Guard members also come under the jurisdiction of the UCMJ, albeit under certain circumstances.

Specifically, when these members are on federal Title 10 active duty orders, they are subject to the same legal standards and disciplinary actions as their full-time active-duty counterparts.

https://ucmj.us/who-is-not-subject-to-u ... unterparts.

Options, just stop.  You are looking more foolish with each post.

Shhhhhh.


You don't know the facts of the case.

Again.


You never do.

Blackvegetable » 13 Nov 2024, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Nov 2024, 2:25 pm

He went to an Ivy, worked as an equity analyst on Wall Street for a firm that died in 2008 and got a Masters in Public Policy

I went to an Ivy, worked as an equity analyst on Wall Street for a firm that died in 2008 and have a Masters in Business Administration.

Your point?

Yet you spend every waking hour of your life at this forum day after day, year after year and your only accomplishment has been to establish a very miserable reputation as a truth hating, mythomaniac for yourself.

Too bad Brown didn't offer you any classes in self respect and character.

*Huey » 14 Nov 2024, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 11:12 am

Ah, go back to the other thread.  But it wasn't you.  It was the jury verdict.

You are not well today.

If you don't like the taste of boot, don't yap.