Liberal Forum

*Huey » 14 Nov 2024, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 1:34 pm

I did make it about facts. 

Just a reminder:

Turnipseed has said that he could not recall whether Bush reported on those occasions

Stupid, uninformed idiot..

In a document dated May 2, 1973, Bush's immediate superiors gave him his annual performance review for the period from May 1, 1972, to April 30, 1973. The review stated that "Lt. Bush has not been observed at this unit during the period of the report."[42] Lt.

The Pentagon released computerized payroll records covering Bush's 1972 service. Like the records released earlier by the White House, the newly released documents did not indicate that Bush performed any drills, in Alabama or elsewhere, during May through September 1972.[50]



Beaten like a drum. 
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 2:06 pm

It's not about me, REMFy...

Sure it is.  You avoided service but feel the need to judge someone else's.  Do you see a trend when you turn ****** and use ST?

Sorry, Suite Class.

I find it hilarious you are complaining someone didn't serve in war who actually joined.  What was it you did.....oh, wait this is awkward for you...I forgot, you brag about the options you had.

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 2:11 pm

Stupid, uninformed idiot..

In a document dated May 2, 1973, Bush's immediate superiors gave him his annual performance review for the period from May 1, 1972, to April 30, 1973. The review stated that "Lt. Bush has not been observed at this unit during the period of the report."[42] Lt.

The Pentagon released computerized payroll records covering Bush's 1972 service. Like the records released earlier by the White House, the newly released documents did not indicate that Bush performed any drills, in Alabama or elsewhere, during May through September 1972.[50]

Beaten like a drum.

That's nice.  You said he was a deserter.  Unless he was on federal active status (which I posted) and he wasn't, he can't be a deserter.

Just nod and go away.  That is the argument, moron.  Nice diversion.

*Huey » 14 Nov 2024, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 2:24 pm

That's nice.  You said he was a deserter.  Unless he was on federal active status (which I posted) and he wasn't, he can't be a deserter.

Just nod and go away.  That is the argument, moron.  Nice diversion.

Yes...because technically, he deserted...

I always tell you that you don't know enough to participate in a discussion on ANY topic.
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 2:36 pm

Yes...because technically, he deserted...

I always tell you that you don't know enough to participate in a discussion on ANY topic.

All you need to do is say yes Huey, once again, you are correct.

And you couldn't have deserted because you weren't man enough to show up.

*Huey » 14 Nov 2024, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 2:22 pm

Sure it is.  You avoided service but feel the need to judge someone else's.  Do you see a trend when you turn ****** and use ST?

Sorry, Suite Class.

I find it hilarious you are complaining someone didn't serve in war who actually joined.  What was it you did.....oh, wait this is awkward for you...I forgot, you brag about the options you had.

There's "service", never to be confused with "sacrifice".


ask
​@GHETTO BLASTER  
 

*Huey » 14 Nov 2024, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 2:38 pm

All you need to do is say yes Huey, once again, you are correct.

And you couldn't have deserted because you weren't man enough to show up.

Why?

You were wrong....again.


 

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 2:38 pm

There's "service", never to be confused with "sacrifice".

ask
​GHETTO BLASTER

You know nothing about either of those, Options.

 

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 2:39 pm

Why?

You were wrong....again.

Not at all.  The facts support me 100%. 

If you meant this....

Yes...because technically, he deserted...

....you would have said so hours ago.  Like your forever changing Cowardly Too Far story.
 
 

*Huey » 14 Nov 2024, 2:42 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 2:42 pm

Not at all.  The facts support me 100%. 

If you meant this....

....you would have said so hours ago.  Like your forever changing Cowardly Too Far story.

Stop, Tiny. You worry about what you should have said.

I said he was a deserter....he was.

You knew nothing more than the propaganda you were fed.

Because you're a moron.
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 2:46 pm

Stop, Tiny. You worry about what you should have said.

I said he was a deserter....he was.

You knew nothing more than the propaganda you were fed.

Because you're a moron.

Sounds to me like he was released from service:

On September 5, 1973, Bush requested discharge from Texas Air National Guard service, to be effective on October 1. He wrote, "I am moving to Boston, Massachusetts to attend Harvard Business School as a full-time student."[46] Jerry Killian recommended approval of the discharge the following day. Bush had completed five years, four months, and five days toward his six-year service obligation.On October 1, 1973, Bush was honorably discharged from the Texas Air National Guard and transferred to the Air Force Reserve's inactive reserves in Denver, Colorado. On November 21, 1974, he was discharged from the Air Force Reserve, ending his military service.In September 2004, Lawrence Korb, an Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan, after reviewing the payroll records for Bush's last two years of service, concluded that they indicated that Bush did not fulfill his obligations and could have been ordered to active duty as a result.[47]

*Huey » 14 Nov 2024, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 2:46 pm

Sounds to me like he was released from service:

On September 5, 1973, Bush requested discharge from Texas Air National Guard service, to be effective on October 1. He wrote, "I am moving to Boston, Massachusetts to attend Harvard Business School as a full-time student."[46] Jerry Killian recommended approval of the discharge the following day. Bush had completed five years, four months, and five days toward his six-year service obligation.On October 1, 1973, Bush was honorably discharged from the Texas Air National Guard and transferred to the Air Force Reserve's inactive reserves in Denver, Colorado. On November 21, 1974, he was discharged from the Air Force Reserve, ending his military service.In September 2004, Lawrence Korb, an Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan, after reviewing the payroll records for Bush's last two years of service, concluded that they indicated that Bush did not fulfill his obligations and could have been ordered to active duty as a result.[47]

Tiny,

There's more detail that you don't know.
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 2:47 pm

Tiny,

There's more detail that you don't know.

 

Sounds like the chain of command released him from service.  

*Huey » 14 Nov 2024, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 2:55 pm

 

Sounds like the chain of command released him from service.

He's Prescott Bush's grandson.

*Huey » 14 Nov 2024, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 2:40 pm

You know nothing about either of those, Options.

I do....my father, uncle and grandfather didn't join to "serve"...


 

HAHAHAHAHA

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 3:14 pm

I do....my father, uncle and grandfather didn't join to "serve"...

.....for free Tranny surgery?
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 3:08 pm

He's Prescott Bush's grandson.

Either way the chain of command released him.  Was he stellar service member?  Nope.  Did he attend all the commitments he was required to attend?  Probably not.  Was he AWOL?  Nope.  Did he desert?  Nope. 

 

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 3:14 pm

I do....my father, uncle and grandfather didn't join to "serve"...

We are not talking about them.  They showed honor, commitment and sacrifice.  And you live vicariously thru their actions.  Probably why you instigated an inferior opponent in your driveway so you could pretend to be a man.

You showed when having an opportunity to do the same as them you opted for OPTIONS.

Please do not secure ME on this topic.  You have absolutely no experience.
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2024, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2024, 2:38 pm

There's "service", never to be confused with "sacrifice".

ask
​@GHETTO BLASTER

BV with another one of his failed "gotchas"