Blackvegetable » 12 Apr 2026, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑
yea..5" 10.5"
Which is why I said "nearly"
You aren't 5' 9"
My 170 is lean muscle mass..
Yours is about 160 of impacted stool.
Blackvegetable » 12 Apr 2026, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑
yea..5" 10.5"
Which is why I said "nearly"
You aren't 5' 9"
My 170 is lean muscle mass..
Yours is about 160 of impacted stool.
By the way idiot, my BMI is lower than yours. You are over 24%. CLOSE to the overweight category.Huey » 12 Apr 2026, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 12 Apr 2026, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑
yea..5" 10.5"
Which is why I said "nearly"
You aren't 5' 9"
My 170 is lean muscle mass..
Yours is about 160 of impacted stool.
I am 5'8" 150. Well, Just under it. I do 600 flutter kicks every other night, 180 ab wheel a few times a week, machines at the gym and I am well below my recommended BMI.
You are 5'10" with chicken legs and need hair plus. But you lied about something as simple as your height. You are probably lying about your weight as well. You are a **** beanstalk.
What else you got lil man?
Huey » 12 Apr 2026, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑
By the way idiot, my BMI is lower than yours. You are over 24%. CLOSE to the overweight category.
I think he sees a GI Joe WWF dude.Blackvegetable » 12 Apr 2026, 5:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you ever walk past yourself in the mirror and refuse to believe you're you because you're built too much like an underwear model?
Blackvegetable » 12 Apr 2026, 5:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you ever walk past yourself in the mirror and refuse to believe you're you because you're built too much like an underwear model?
Post my lie..
That’s been done, Fatty.
A sure sign that you know you are lying.
I have posted where you claim to be 5’ 10 and where you suddenly claim to be 5’11.
Huey » 13 Apr 2026, 6:05 am » wrote: ↑ I have posted where you claim to be 5’ 10 and where you suddenly claim to be 5’11.
Fatty, you lied
Don't rephrase..where you suddenly claim to be 5’11.
I have posted your words meltdown fatty.
You lied, Tiny..
Body Mass Index (BMI) is widely considered a flawed health metric because it only calculates weight relative to height, failing to distinguish between muscle mass, bone density, and fat distribution.fatty
****. Seems I struck a nerve.Blackvegetable » 13 Apr 2026, 6:15 am » wrote: ↑ You lied, Tiny..
Body Mass Index (BMI) is widely considered a flawed health metric because it only calculates weight relative to height, failing to distinguish between muscle mass, bone density, and fat distribution.
you have little or no lean muscle mass, and the bone density of a chicken.
And his nueral connectivity is impaired. Maybe his forehead is big as Gaetz's but whatever antenna is in there ain't picking up.Blackvegetable » 13 Apr 2026, 6:15 am » wrote: ↑ You lied, Tiny..
Body Mass Index (BMI) is widely considered a flawed health metric because it only calculates weight relative to height, failing to distinguish between muscle mass, bone density, and fat distribution.
you have little or no lean muscle mass, and the bone density of a chicken.
What's "****"?
:rofl:Seems I struck a nerve.
You don't have any dumb bell pictures to post showing your prodigious, headless, man specimen?Blackvegetable » 13 Apr 2026, 6:15 am » wrote: ↑ You lied, Tiny..
Body Mass Index (BMI) is widely considered a flawed health metric because it only calculates weight relative to height, failing to distinguish between muscle mass, bone density, and fat distribution.
you have little or no lean muscle mass, and the bone density of a chicken.
Check your old lady's screensaver ....RebelGator » 13 Apr 2026, 6:23 am » wrote: ↑ You don't have any dumb bell pictures to post showing your prodigious, headless, man specimen?
Do it, shrimp....make us laugh.