Liberal Forum

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 9:06 am

There is no mystery as to why you rarely win.  To be blunt you are a stupid man who is not very well informed.  Your other glaring issue is you have the reading and comprehension skills of a 6 year old who suffers from ADHD.

I read the judge's filing.

Did you?
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 9:07 am

I read the judge's filing.

Did you?

Again, for the 6 year old with ADHD and poor reading skills, you, this is not about what the judge said.  

Thank you for proving my analysis about you correct.

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 9:12 am

Again, for the 6 year old with ADHD and poor reading skills, you, this is not about what the judge said.  

Thank you for proving my analysis about you correct.

But, child, it IS.

Once the jury renders a judgment ANY interpretation of that judgment is EXCLUSIVELY a matter for judges..first the presiding judge, and if sucessfully appealed, appellate judges.

If you haven't read the filing, ProjectoLass, you have nothing to contribute.

You know your rule.

 

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 9:06 am

There is no mystery as to why you rarely win.  To be blunt you are a stupid man who is not very well informed.  Your other glaring issue is you have the reading and comprehension skills of a 6 year old who suffers from ADHD.

Yes but he's world class at choking on a horse dick.

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 9:19 am

But, child, it IS.

Once the jury renders a judgment ANY interpretation of that judgment is EXCLUSIVELY a matter for judges..first the presiding judge, and if sucessfully appealed, appellate judges.

If you haven't read the filing, ProjectoLass, you have nothing to contribute.

You know your rule.

And the jury’s finding was no rape.  No

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 9:23 am

And the jury’s finding was no rape.  No

The jury awarded 2 million for Sexual Assault.

The only act of Sexual Assault alleged was penetration by finger and penis.

Because Grifty has tiny hands and a tiny penis, the jury could not ascertain with which tiny appendage the plaintiff was penetrated, by the preponderance of the evidence.

The fact that they found in favor of penetration, defined in ALL civilized society as Rape, means that the penetrator, in this case the aforementioned tiny dick respondent, is a Rapist, by definition.

That, Mincing REMFy, is "making an unimpeachable case".

Ya follah? 


 

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 9:34 am

The jury awarded 2 million for Sexual Assault.

The only act of Sexual Assault alleged was penetration by finger and penis.

Because Grifty has tiny hands and a tiny penis, the jury could not ascertain with which tiny appendage the plaintiff was penetrated, by the preponderance of the evidence.

The fact that they found in favor of penetration, defined in ALL civilized society as Rape, means that the penetrator, in this case the aforementioned tiny dick respondent, is a Rapist, by definition.

That, Mincing REMFy, is "making an unimpeachable case".

Ya follah?

I already told you the breakdown of the 5 million dollar finding.   The jury rejected the Rape finding. MS
e ifically Rejected.  On paper.

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 9:38 am

I already told you the breakdown of the 5 million dollar finding.   The jury rejected the Rape finding. MS
e ifically Rejected.  On paper.

It was 2 million....which you would know had you read the filing.

The jury rejected the Rape finding

Is "non consensual digital penetration" rape?

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 9:42 am

It was 2 million....which you would know had you read the filing.

Is "non consensual digital penetration" rape?

Only for the sexual abuse, ****.  Don’t forget the defamination ya non reading ****.  I posted this all last week.

https://apnews.com/article/trump-rape-c ... f9ec83d7db

Reqdi g it this time.

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 9:48 am

Only for the sexual abuse, ****.  Don’t forget the defamination ya non reading ****.  I posted this all last week.

https://apnews.com/article/trump-rape-c ... f9ec83d7db

Reqdi g it this time.

What specific act of Sexual Abuse was alleged?

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 9:48 am

Only for the sexual abuse, ****.  Don’t forget the defamination ya non reading ****.  I posted this all last week.

https://apnews.com/article/trump-rape-c ... f9ec83d7db

Reqdi g it this time.

Is "non consensual digital penetration" rape?

Try NotRunning.

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 9:49 am

What specific act of Sexual Abuse was alleged?

Rape was rejected by the jury.  Post that yourself.

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 9:50 am

Is "non consensual digital penetration" rape?

Try NotRunning.

Rape was specifically rejected by the jury.  Acknowledge that and try not running.

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 8:53 am

You're some kind of world class moron.

Says the nurtured mentality serving ideas life isn't self evident time adapting equally here now. Please inform us about your we are better than me because you believe life isn't what is going on here. Your reality being absolutely corrupted by your own behavior since birth.

Blackvegetable » 16 Nov 2024, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

16 Nov 2024, 10:30 am

Hoist "by".

Thank me when The Vapors pass.

bump

per your request