Liberal Forum

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 5:54 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 5:54 pm

Nope, you have not.  You gave the federal legal definition when transporting weapons over state lines.  We are talking about YOUR definition.

In your definition if the chamber is empty but the magazine is loaded is that a loaded or unloaded firearm, bearing a load?

 

You gave the federal legal definition when transporting weapons over state lines.  We are talking about YOUR definition.

How the **** would I know what the FEDERAL definition is?

I told you what MINE is, lying *******.

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 5:57 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 5:57 pm

I've CLEARLY indicated that I do not consider a shotgun with shells in the tube to be "unloaded"...

There's no point to your question, but you can no longer deny that you've been answered.

Acknowledge

Ok.  That means you are clueless.  

my definition is in line with the State of Utah and other States.  Stay in your lane.  

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 5:59 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 5:59 pm

Ok.  That means you are clueless.  

my definition is in line with the State of Utah and other States.  Stay in your lane.

No, it doesn't...

You just posted that I used the federal definition.

You are thicker than pig ****.
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 5:59 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 5:59 pm

How the **** would I know what the FEDERAL definition is?

I told you what MINE is, lying *******.

Because *******, you said you had to keep the ammunition separate from the firearm ya cowardly stupid ****.  I told you that when you said it.

****, I know you gave me yours.  Why do you think I worded the question like this:

In your definition if the chamber is empty but the magazine is loaded is that a loaded or unloaded firearm, bearing a load?

Damn, I **** own you.

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 5:59 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 5:59 pm

Ok.  That means you are clueless.  

my definition is in line with the State of Utah and other States.  Stay in your lane.

Are these your words, moron?

You gave the federal legal definition when transporting weapons over state lines.

how does that make me "clueless"?

**** glue huffer.

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 6:01 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 6:01 pm

Because *******, you said you had to keep the ammunition separate from the firearm ya cowardly stupid ****.  I told you that when you said it.

****, I know you gave me yours.  Why do you think I worded the question like this:

In your definition if the chamber is empty but the magazine is loaded is that a loaded or unloaded firearm, bearing a load?

Damn, I **** own you.

Answer the question asked, you dumb **** 

Will someone PLEASE bitch slap BV

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 6:00 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 6:00 pm

No, it doesn't...

You just posted that I used the federal definition.

You are thicker than pig ****.

The federal definition when transporting firearms across state lines into.  which only applies in certain circumstances like going from an open carry state into a gunophobe state.

Get it right, ****.  Not driving around in Your state or going from VA Fl down 95.
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 6:02 pm

Are these your words, moron?

how does that make me "clueless"?

**** glue huffer.

You didn’t even know you did.  Acknowledge you were answered.  And yes, my names on the quote.  They are yournwords.

Your personal definition is not inline with every state or circumstances, Right now you are proving my point you are ill informed on the subject,

 

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 6:03 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 6:03 pm

Answer the question asked, you dumb ****

I did.  You ran along all day evading a question, Mary, and now you are whiny about a question I answered?  

There in context, in debate, or physically, where you can defeat me.

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 5:59 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 5:59 pm

How the **** would I know what the FEDERAL definition is?

I told you what MINE is, lying *******.

Repost for the dimwitted:

Because *******, you said you had to keep the ammunition separate from the firearm ya cowardly stupid ****.  I told you that when you said it.



 

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 6:07 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 6:07 pm

Repost for the dimwitted:

Because *******, you said you had to keep the ammunition separate from the firearm ya cowardly stupid ****.  I told you that when you said it.

Post my words.

Only when I went to Mexico....because those were the MEXICAN  regulations.

**** idiot.

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 6:17 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 6:17 pm

Post my words.

Only when I went to Mexico....because those were the MEXICAN  regulations.

**** idiot.

Damn, you are too easy.  You didn’t cross any state lines, whether by air, auto or train?

This proves even further I am more experienced and informed on this than you.  No more lectures from idiots like you who quote federal law concerning transporting weapons thru certain states and conditions and don’t they are doing it.

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 5:37 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 5:37 pm

You don't answer questions, Quimmie.

I answered your incessant and moronic questions. What more do you want??

There are NO OTHER RAPE QUESTIONS on the Jury Verdict sheet. How hard is that for you to COMPREHEND?? And that's the ONLY CORRECT answer that can be given since YOUR allegation is that Trump was found to have committed a rape. NO JURY has ever found that, and quite the opposite has been PROVEN beyond all doubt. 

The part YOU don't like is that it KICKS YOUR ****** ***. Again. OVER AND OVER AND OVER!!

READ, DICKFACE, because THIS is the LAST TIME you get JACK **** on this very LIE you are trying to make truth!!

https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png
 

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 6:01 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 6:01 pm

Because *******, you said you had to keep the ammunition separate from the firearm ya cowardly stupid ****.  I told you that when you said it.

****, I know you gave me yours.  Why do you think I worded the question like this:

In your definition if the chamber is empty but the magazine is loaded is that a loaded or unloaded firearm, bearing a load?

Damn, I **** own you.

Because *******, you said you had to keep the ammunition separate from the firearm ya cowardly stupid ****.  I told you that when you said it.

Because we DROVE into Mexico from Texas....wtf does that have to do with FEDERAL regulations?

****, I know you gave me yours.  Why do you think I worded the question like this:

In your definition if the chamber is empty but the magazine is loaded is that a loaded or unloaded firearm, bearing a load?

Who the **** knows? You’re a moron.

Once you've said something stupid, I'm good...I'm not laboring to find any merit in your spew...

You’re going to run from it anyway.

*Beekeeper » 17 Nov 2024, 6:23 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 6:23 pm

I answered your incessant and moronic questions. What more do you want??

There are NO OTHER RAPE QUESTIONS on the Jury Verdict sheet. How hard is that for you to COMPREHEND?? And that's the ONLY CORRECT answer that can be given since YOUR allegation is that Trump was found to have committed a rape. NO JURY has ever found that, and quite the opposite has been PROVEN beyond all doubt. 

The part YOU don't like is that it KICKS YOUR ****** ***. Again. OVER AND OVER AND OVER!!

READ, DICKFACE, because THIS is the LAST TIME you get JACK **** on this very LIE you are trying to make truth!!

https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png

Is "Digital Penetration" rape?

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 6:31 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 6:31 pm

Is "Digital Penetration" rape?

ah did your son **** you up the *** again?

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 6:31 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 6:31 pm

Is "Digital Penetration" rape?

Not in NY STATE!!!

Sucks, huh, that you get CURB STOMPED on every **** attempt you make to turn NO RAPE in to "rape"!!!

Now, SHUT THE **** UP, and go eat ****!!
 

*Beekeeper » 17 Nov 2024, 6:34 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 6:34 pm

Not in NY STATE!!!

Sucks, huh, that you get CURB STOMPED on every **** attempt to make to turn NO RAPE in to "rape"!!!

Now, SHUT THE **** UP, and go eat ****!!

Legislation (S.3161/A.3340), also known as the “Rape is Rape” bill, removes the penetration requirement from the rape statutes and also defines rape as vaginal sexual contact, oral sexual contact, and anal sexual contact. The existing statue excluded oral and anal rape from being called rape and required a higher standard for vaginal rape. By modernizing New York’s rape statutes, this legislation ensures all survivors are protected from these crimes and offenders will be held fully accountable


**** idiot.
 

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 6:19 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 6:19 pm

Damn, you are too easy.  You didn’t cross any state lines, whether by air, auto or train?

This proves even further I am more experienced and informed on this than you.  No more lectures from idiots like you who quote federal law concerning transporting weapons thru certain states and conditions and don’t they are doing it.

Not with shells....Texas and Mexico are contiguous.


It proves that you're a moron.