Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 5:25 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 5:25 pm

Link?

**** idiot.

Watch the entire video.
The proof that Russian interference had no effect on the 2016  election is at the very end.
https://x.com/TheAlexStrenger/status/18 ... 1433178234
 
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 6:29 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 6:29 pm

Because we DROVE into Mexico from Texas....wtf does that have to do with FEDERAL regulations?

Who the **** knows? You’re a moron.

Once you've said something stupid, I'm good...I'm not laboring to find any merit in your spew...

You’re going to run from it anyway.

States know.  Establishments know.  Gun owners Know.  Once again you are in over your head.

I haven’t said anything stupid.  What I have done is methodically and legally shown you are ignorant pertaining to the topic.  That is why you refuse to answer questions.  I **** destroyed you.

I suggest you turn tail on the topic.  If you do the bleeding will stop.  If you don’t, we’ll, **** ya.

 
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 7:12 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 7:12 pm

Not with shells....Texas and Mexico are contiguous.

It proves that you're a moron.

Remember what I said about Mexico?  How did you get your shotgun down?  It doesn’t matter, you inadvertently quoted federal law as I stated above.

Blackvegetable » 16 Nov 2024, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑

16 Nov 2024, 6:54 am

Had to watch it to see an acquaintance.

First time.

It was painful to watch.

I don't know who died and made Kevin Leary matter.

Two guys standing there in full promo uniform, their product branded....and Leary asks them to tell him their margins.

My guess is that the gross margin is 80%...

The product costs $0.35 per application. Min. purchase $35. The readily available substitute is chalk @ 1.25 per metric ton.

EVERY potential customer will know they are paying an enormous markup. It will be forever archived on YouTube.

The rest of the panel wasn't much better.

That show is total crap.

Am I getting "profit margins tend toward zero" late stage capitalism vibes? 

It's almost like Marx was right on point...

Blackvegetable » 16 Nov 2024, 6:57 am » wrote: ↑

16 Nov 2024, 6:57 am

The definition of "punter" is someone who watches Shark Tank.

Should you ever hear anyone tell you they are regular watchers, keep a safe distance....that level of stupid may be virulent.

I do agree though...Shark Tank is pretty retarded.

The smartest guys bought Bitcoin below $100. Now THAT'S phenomenal. No asset class comes even close since 2010.

The # of "good business ideas" today deserving of exemplary execution is likely in the single digits as everything is "saturated" or monopolized.

Does this implicate or necessitate a Teddy Roosevelt style "trust busting?"
 

Blackvegetable » 16 Nov 2024, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑

16 Nov 2024, 7:30 am

G.O.P.-Led Senate Panel Details Ties Between 2016 Trump Campaign and Russia

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/18/us/p ... roid-share

https://therecord.media/russian-interfe ... tudy-finds

 
 

Blackvegetable » 16 Nov 2024, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑

16 Nov 2024, 6:54 am

I am angry and suicidal.

Duhh, you show this each day, Cranky ***    
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Nov 2024, 8:48 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 8:48 pm

https://therecord.media/russian-interfe ... tudy-finds

So you grossly overstate their conclusions...and then the same author reports

https://therecord.media/german-football ... -influence

He's as conflicted as you are.

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 9:27 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 9:27 pm

So you grossly overstate their conclusions...and then the same author reports

https://therecord.media/german-football ... -influence

He's as conflicted as you are.

Conflicted like...

GUTTED KAKA?
 

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 8:06 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 8:06 pm

Remember what I said about Mexico?  How did you get your shotgun down?  It doesn’t matter, you inadvertently quoted federal law as I stated above.

Yea, vaguely.

It was stupid and irrelevant. 

How did you get your shotgun down?  

In the required packaging and with the attendant paperwork...it was more than 30 years ago. They sell shells in Texas...it's in America. 

 It doesn’t matter, you inadvertently quoted federal law as I stated above.

What difference does that make given I was correct and your effort failed?
 

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 7:59 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 7:59 pm

States know.  Establishments know.  Gun owners Know.  Once again you are in over your head.

I haven’t said anything stupid.  What I have done is methodically and legally shown you are ignorant pertaining to the topic.  That is why you refuse to answer questions.  I **** destroyed you.

I suggest you turn tail on the topic.  If you do the bleeding will stop.  If you don’t, we’ll, **** ya.

States know.  Establishments know.  Gun owners Know.  Once again you are in over your head.

I got it right the first time. This has been entirely pointless.

 That is why you refuse to answer questions.

Not only did I answer, you've acknowledged that it was correct.

You're a **** idiot.

I suggest you turn tail on the topic.

What "topic"?

I haven't gotten anything wrong yet.

 If you do the bleeding will stop.  If you don’t, we’ll, **** ya.

Stop yapping, Twat...you get your *** kicked on this topic all the time.

There is no topic on which I don't humiliate you....hence your Issue.

 

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 9:27 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 9:27 pm

So you grossly overstate their conclusions...and then the same author reports

https://therecord.media/german-football ... -influence

He's as conflicted as you are.

You grossly over estimate the number of people in the USA who did not have VERY strong feelings about 2 of the most "polar opposite" candidates in US history.
Then there was what actually happened..https://heavy.com/news/2016/12/more-ele ... est-votes/ ...... this account proves your theory that Russian Facebooks Ads caused ANY Electors to flip from Hillary to Trump...IS FALSE.

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 10:04 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 10:04 pm

I got it right the first time. This has been entirely pointless.

Not only did I answer, you've acknowledged that it was correct.

You're a **** idiot.

What "topic"?

I haven't gotten anything wrong yet.

Stop yapping, Twat...you get your *** kicked on this topic all the time.

There is no topic on which I don't humiliate you....hence your Issue.

Damn...

ADHD has set in..,,,angry, lost
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 7:04 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 7:04 pm

Legislation (S.3161/A.3340), also known as the “Rape is Rape” bill, removes the penetration requirement from the rape statutes and also defines rape as vaginal sexual contact, oral sexual contact, and anal sexual contact. The existing statue excluded oral and anal rape from being called rape and required a higher standard for vaginal rape. By modernizing New York’s rape statutes, this legislation ensures all survivors are protected from these crimes and offenders will be held fully accountable

**** idiot.

Sorry, DICKWEED, but in case you missed it, LAWS can't be RETROACTIVE and in the case of Trump, this DID NOT APPLY!! It was passed way AFTER the allegations where made!!

Congress is prohibited from passing ex post facto laws by clause 3 of Article I, Section 9 of the United States Constitution. The states are prohibited from passing ex post facto laws by clause 1 of Article I, Section 10.

Damn, boy, you get **** OVER on every damn thing you do!!!

*Beekeeper » 18 Nov 2024, 6:07 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 6:07 am

Sorry, DICKWEED, but in case you missed it, LAWS can't be RETROACTIVE and in the case of Trump, this DID NOT APPLY!! It was passed way AFTER the allegations where made!!

Damn, boy, you get **** OVER on every damn thing you do!!!

Go read the question again, *******.
 

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2024, 6:30 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 6:30 am

Go read the question again, *******.

GO READ WHAT **** QUESTION, ASSHOLE??

YOU made the claim that rape was "finger manipulation" and IT WASN'T AT THE TIME THE ALLEGATIONS OCCURRED. PERIOD!!

YOUR failed attempt to "redefine" it as the NEW "definition" was made is a **** FAILURE since NO LAW can apply ex post facto, and that means RETROACTIVE in ANY case, criminal or civil!! I PROVED THAT with actual reference to the US Constitution. 

NY State law DID NOT DEFINE RAPE as you claimed when Trump ALLEDGEDLY "diddled" Carroll. Which was nothing more than a "he said, she said" **** CASE and is likely to be COMPLETELY TOSSED on appeal!!

TRUMP IS NOT A RAPIST. PERIOD!! So unless you and countless OTHERS are willing to defend a DEFAMATION LAWSUIT< which Trump can EASILY bring, you should probably SHUT THE **** UP and take your *** KICKING AND CURB STOMPING like the ****** PIECE OF MONKEY **** YOU ARE!!

Run along boy, you're getting tiresome and boring.

*Beekeeper » 18 Nov 2024, 6:37 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 6:37 am

GO READ WHAT **** QUESTION, ASSHOLE??

YOU made the claim that rape was "finger manipulation" and IT WASN'T AT THE TIME THE ALLEGATIONS OCCURRED. PERIOD!!

YOUR failed attempt to "redefine" it as the NEW "definition" was made is a **** FAILURE since NO LAW can apply ex post facto, and that means RETROACTIVE in ANY case, criminal or civil!! I PROVED THAT with actual reference to the US Constitution. 

NY State law DID NOT DEFINE RAPE as you claimed when Trump ALLEDGEDLY "diddled" Carroll. Which was nothing more than a "he said, she said" **** CASE and is likely to be COMPLETELY TOSSED on appeal!!

TRUMP IS NOT A RAPIST. PERIOD!! So unless you and countless OTHERS are willing to defend a DEFAMATION LAWSUIT< which Trump can EASILY bring, you should probably SHUT THE **** UP and take your *** KICKING AND CURB STOMPING like the ****** PIECE OF MONKEY **** YOU ARE!!

Run along boy, you're getting tiresome and boring.

If you don’t answer the question asked, **** off.

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2024, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 6:50 am

If you don’t answer the question asked, **** off.

I answered it MORON!!!

Because you don't like the ANSWER, doesn't mean you get to be a MAGGOT TURD and try to get something you will agree with. 

There are NO OTHER QUESTIONS on the JURY VERDICT FORM that say "rape" and the ONLY ONE there said Trump did NOT commit rape on Carroll!!

Now, EITHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ONE SIMPLE FACT, OR YOU JUST **** YOURSELF AGAIN!!!

Did THE JURY FIND TRUMP COMMITTED A RAPE ON CARROLL??

Answer- NO!!

https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2024, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 6:50 am

If you don’t answer the question asked, **** off.

OH, and DICKFACE, the question said "by the PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE". 

Sucks that the EVIDENCE didn't prove a "rape" OCCURRED!!

But you keep trying to turn your LIE into "truth" and we'll keep CURB STOMPING YOUR *** INTO A LITTLE PILE OF MAGGOT FEED!!!
 

*Beekeeper » 18 Nov 2024, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 7:00 am

OH, and DICKFACE, the question said "by the PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE". 

Sucks that the EVIDENCE didn't prove a "rape" OCCURRED!!

But you keep trying to turn your LIE into "truth" and we'll keep CURB STOMPING YOUR *** INTO A LITTLE PILE OF MAGGOT FEED!!!

BGroomer,

You're a moron.

Kudos