Liberal Forum

*Beekeeper » 18 Nov 2024, 6:57 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 6:57 am

I answered it MORON!!!

Because you don't like the ANSWER, doesn't mean you get to be a MAGGOT TURD and try to get something you will agree with. 

There are NO OTHER QUESTIONS on the JURY VERDICT FORM that say "rape" and the ONLY ONE there said Trump did NOT commit rape on Carroll!!

Now, EITHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ONE SIMPLE FACT, OR YOU JUST **** YOURSELF AGAIN!!!

Did THE JURY FIND TRUMP COMMITTED A RAPE ON CARROLL??

Answer- NO!!

https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png

Fondler, 

Stay down.

Your bleeding is making me queasy

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2024, 7:04 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 7:04 am

Fondler, 

Stay down.

Your bleeding is making me queasy

No. MONKEYPISS4BRAINS, that is YOUR BLOOD, not mine!!

I PROVED that NO JURY has found Trump guilty of any rape!! PERIOD!! 

YOU have proved JACK **** and got CURB STOMPED AND PIG GUTTED ON EVERY POST YOU MAKE!! Learn to LOSE with dignity, DICKHEAD!!

                   

*Beekeeper » 18 Nov 2024, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 7:05 am

No. MONKEYPISS4BRAINS, that is YOUR BLOOD, not mine!!

I PROVED that NO JURY has found Trump guilty of any rape!! PERIOD!! 

YOU have proved JACK **** and got CURB STOMPED AND PIG GUTTED ON EVERY POST YOU MAKE!! Learn to LOSE with dignity, DICKHEAD!!

                 

Take the L and go on with your "life".

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2024, 7:16 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 7:16 am

Take the L and go on with your "life".

Your strikethroughs aren't impressing anyone, DICKUPTHEASS!!

UNTIL you make a PUBLIC ADMISSION that TRUMP HAS NEVER BEEN FOUND GUILTY OF RAPE BY ANY JURY, YOU'RE THE **** LOSER, CURB STOMPED, DEAD AND BURIED PIECE OF ****!! And NO ONE is going to answer ANY of your illiterate "questions" either!!

So here's your chance.....

HAS ANY JURY FOUND TRUMP GUILTY OF RAPE??? Simple, YES or NO!! No "judges" opinion, or rewriting the DEFINTION of "Rape" EX POST FACTO, but the FACTS ON WHAT A JURY FOUND!!

And since you seem to need a LOT OF HELP in finding the answer, I found it for you....

https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png

CHEKCMATE, ****, CHECKMATE!!!

 
 

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 3:25 pm

That’s a loaded weapon.
 
 

NO ****. You want to tell me about legal definitions of social behavior, let me explain natural time living in a body alive as eternally separated in plain sight you won't admit happens daily the 7 different names this rotation gets 52 weeks a year.

International dateline is dividing yesterday, today, and tomorrow intellectually making every ancestor believe life is larger than adapting as displaced geographically located any rotation since conceived.

Society teaches self deception regardless the society here historically or current events within this species as a whole population in this atmosphere now.

I work actual accountability beyond what people are willing to believe true to relative time semantics currently governing tomorrow midnight to noon, calling noon to midnight end of the day.

Where did yesterday go? checked off date on a calendar journaling human behavior all 5 generation gaps alive this rotation? One in the chamber 0-9 months before date of birth each great great grandchild adds another 5th generation gap of ever changing relatives living forward now.

*Beekeeper » 18 Nov 2024, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 7:32 am

Your strikethroughs aren't impressing anyone, DICKUPTHEASS!!

UNTIL you make a PUBLIC ADMISSION that TRUMP HAS NEVER BEEN FOUND GUILTY OF RAPE BY ANY JURY, YOU'RE THE **** LOSER, CURB STOMPED, DEAD AND BURIED PIECE OF ****!! And NO ONE is going to answer ANY of your illiterate "questions" either!!

So here's your chance.....

HAS ANY JURY FOUND TRUMP GUILTY OF RAPE??? Simpe, YES or NO!! No "judges" opinion, or rewriting the DEFINTION of "Rape" EX POST FACTO, but the FACTS ON WHAT A JURY FOUND!!

And since you seem to need a LOT OF HELP in finding the answer, I found it for you....

https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png

CHEKCMATE, ****, CHECKMATE!!!

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Checkmate indeed.

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2024, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 7:36 am

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Checkmate indeed.

Once AGAIN, you LOSE and FAILED THE TEST!!

The JUDGE gets no say in a JURY VERDICT, DICKWEED. So that is a MOOT POINT IN ALL REGARDS!! 

He can't under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES attempt to find something a JURY NEVER FOUND!! He even ADMITS that that the JURY FOUND NO RAPE UNDER THE NY STATE PENAL CODE!! Simple as that as did the JURY have that SAME FINDING. 

NO RAPE OCCURRED!! But some PARTISAN HACK JUDGE trying to reframe it for you LWNJ's isn't a VERDICT OF THE JURY!! 

AND the questions isn't what some hack judge said, and it's simple- "DID A JURY FIND TRUMP GUILTY OF RAPING CARROLL"??

Answer- NO!!

https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png

*Beekeeper » 18 Nov 2024, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 7:44 am

Once AGAIN, you LOSE and FAILED THE TEST!!

The JUDGE gets no say in a JURY VERDICT, DICKWEED. So that is a MOOT POINT IN ALL REGARDS!! 

He can't under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES attempt to find something a JURY NEVER FOUND!! He even ADMITS that that the JURY FOUND NO RAPE UNDER THE NY STATE PENAL CODE!! Simple as that as did the JURY have that SAME FINDING. 

NO RAPE OCCURRED!! But some PARTISAN HACK JUDGE trying to reframe it for you LWNJ's isn't a VERDICT OF THE JURY!! 

AND the questions isn't what some hack judge said, and it's simple- "DID A JURY FIND TRUMP GUILTY OF RAPING CARROLL"??

Answer- NO!!

https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png

No, BGroomer....you are wrong.

You are a moron.

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2024, 7:54 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 7:54 am

No, BGroomer....you are wrong.

You are a moron.

define the term female

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 9:56 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 9:56 pm

Yea, vaguely.

It was stupid and irrelevant. 

In the required packaging and with the attendant paperwork...it was more than 30 years ago. They sell shells in Texas...it's in America. 

What difference does that make given I was correct and your effort failed?

you weren’t correct.  In Ca you definition of a loaded or unloaded gun is correct.  In Utah your definition is in correct.  You had no clue what the law was.  

*Huey » 18 Nov 2024, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 8:49 am

you weren’t correct.  In Ca you definition of a loaded or unloaded gun is correct.  In Utah your definition is in correct.  You had no clue what the law was.

You've insisted that I correctly cited the federal standard.

 

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2024, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 8:52 am

You've insisted that I correctly cited the federal standard.

a sorry, you say something Strike thru….

*Huey » 18 Nov 2024, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 9:02 am

a sorry, you say something Strike thru….

I struck through a post lie tantrum and stated a fact.

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2024, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 9:03 am

I struck through a post lie tantrum and stated a fact.

Rhetorical question
What is the physical difference between arbitrary facts by social consensus and actual results by genetic additions to population left alive daily here?

universal result answer.
Ancestries evolving and people denying their time ancestrally positioned now living as eternally separated while here cradle to grave.

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2024, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 9:03 am

I struck through a post lie tantrum and stated a fact.

Hello, you speaking to me, Binky?
 

*Huey » 18 Nov 2024, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 9:12 am

Hello, you speaking to me, Binky?

No...to the cloud of dust into which you disappeared. 

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2024, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 10:58 am

No...to the cloud of dust into which you disappeared.

Use that talking point often.  I don’t disappear, Binky.  There is nothing in context you can do to make me disappear.  

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2024, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 7:36 am

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Checkmate indeed.

Just so you know, it doesn't matter what "people commonly understand the word rape" means. The ONLY thing that matters in a COURT OF LAW is what the LEGISLATURE OF THAT STATE has put into WRITING and as part of their LAWS, what the meaning of "rape" is. So Kaplan is hanging himself with that ONE STATEMENT that has ZERO bearing on a damn thing. Fact is, HE wrote the JURY INSTRUCTIONS which DEFINED RAPE for the jury before they determined the yes or no to the RAPE QUESTION. They DETERMINED THERE WAS NO RAPE!!

Now that he didn't get that "rape" claim found to be a "yes", he goes out on some wild *** tangent and decided UNILATERALLY that there was rape based on PUBLIC OPINION, not the PENAL CODE DEFINITION.

Now, if that's way over your **** little MAGGOT FILLED HEAD, we understand. But take your CURB STOMPING like the ****** you are and SHUT THE **** BEFORE YOU GET ANOTHER 23 or so!!

*Beekeeper » 18 Nov 2024, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 11:48 am

Just so you know, it doesn't matter what "people commonly understand the word rape" means. The ONLY thing that matters in a COURT OF LAW is what the LEGISLATURE OF THAT STATE has put into WRITING and as part of their LAWS, what the meaning of "rape" is. So Kaplan is hanging himself with that ONE STATEMENT that has ZERO bearing on a damn thing. Fact is, HE wrote the JURY INSTRUCTIONS which DEFINED RAPE for the jury before they determined the yes or no to the RAPE QUESTION. They DETERMINED THERE WAS NO RAPE!!

Now that he didn't get that "rape" claim found to be a "yes", he goes out on some wild *** tangent and decided UNILATERALLY that there was rape based on PUBLIC OPINION, not the PENAL CODE DEFINITION.

Now, if that's way over your **** little MAGGOT FILLED HEAD, we understand. But take your CURB STOMPING like the ****** you are and SHUT THE **** BEFORE YOU GET ANOTHER 23 or so!!

What matters is what the judge says the verdict is.
 

*Huey » 18 Nov 2024, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 11:36 am

Use that talking point often.  I don’t disappear, Binky.  There is nothing in context you can do to make me disappear.

All day, every day.

Like the owned little bitch you are.