Liberal Forum

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 10:29 am

ignore what proves you wrong and divert. That has always been your tactic.

Projectolass,

That is EXACTLY what you are doing.

You are refusing to acknowledge the RELEVANT facts.

And you insist on criticizing an opinion you haven't even read...

which is why you run from every question..


again 
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 10:28 am

So answer it, @*******

I did. 

WHY do you insist on getting your *** HANDED to you again and again??? Are you that much of a masochist that you DEMAND people FLOG YOUR MAGGOT FILLED *** constantly???

Please, run along now before you DEMAND something else that gets you REALLY hurt. You know, you "demand" a meeting so you can "crush my femur" or some stupid **** like that that your 5'4" 135lb PLUG NICKEL *** can't back up from that MILLION DOLLAR MOUTH you have!!! In the vernacular of the masses, you're a **** COWARD!! Or ******. Either works in your case.

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 10:32 am

Projectolass,

That is EXACTLY what you are doing.

You are refusing to acknowledge the RELEVANT facts.

And you insist on criticizing an opinion you haven't even read...

which is why you run from every question..

again

It is over.  The jury specifically rejected rape.  Until you acknowledge that is what the jury did that is the only answer you will get,

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 10:34 am

It is over.  The jury specifically rejected rape.  Until you acknowledge that is what the jury did that is the only answer you will get,

Is "digital penetration" Rape?

*Beekeeper » 17 Nov 2024, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 10:32 am

I did. 

WHY do you insist on getting your *** HANDED to you again and again??? Are you that much of a masochist that you DEMAND people FLOG YOUR MAGGOT FILLED *** constantly???

Please, run along now before you DEMAND something else that gets you REALLY hurt. You know, you "demand" a meeting so you can "crush my femur" or some stupid **** like that that your 5'4" 135lb PLUG NICKEL *** can't back up from that MILLION DOLLAR MOUTH you have!!! In the vernacular of the masses, you're a **** COWARD!! Or ******. Either works in your case.

No...you haven't because you are a coward.


 

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 6:44 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 6:44 am

I find you posting a question and you declare me The Lord and kill yourself..

Deal?

When have I ever claimed that I never posted questions? There is one just now. 

It's not about questions, it's about you using them as safe space so you don't have to answer anyone else. 

God man. The **** redundancy. Moron. 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=47s

Vegas » 17 Nov 2024, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 11:02 am

When have I ever claimed that I never posted questions? There is one just now. 

It's not about questions, it's about you using them as safe space so you don't have to answer anyone else. 

God man. The **** redundancy. Moron. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=47s

And running when the answer will hurt his argument.

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 11:05 am

And running when the answer will hurt his argument.

Narcissists are such cowards. I have repeatedly challenged him to prove that I don't answer questions habitually from other members the first time. I just don't with him because he doesn't answers questions from anyone else. Thus, he deserves the same respect that he gives others. None. 

He has yet to prove it. He runs and runs and runs.

Vegas » 17 Nov 2024, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 11:19 am

Narcissists are such cowards. I have repeatedly challenged him to prove that I don't answer questions habitually from other members the first time. I just don't with him because he doesn't answers questions from anyone else. Thus, he deserves the same respect that he gives others. None. 

He has yet to prove it. He runs and runs and runs.

He is on notice.  If he wants answers he will answer follow-up questions and stop with the strike thru when he trying narrowly define the discussion.  

He wants to play pretend that he is a lawyer in court with his direct but is a ****** when it comes to cross.

 

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 11:21 am

He is on notice.  If he wants answers he will answer follow-up questions and stop with the strike thru when he trying narrowly define the discussion.  

He wants to play pretend that he is a lawyer in court with his direct but is a ****** when it comes to cross.

He sucks at questioning. His questions are stupid as hell. If he wants to become a skilled questionnaire to be taken seriously, then he should study the Socratic model. However, that requires him to answer as well. That would never happen. 

Vegas » 17 Nov 2024, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 11:23 am

He sucks at questioning. His questions are stupid as hell. If he wants to become a skilled questionnaire to be taken seriously, then he should study the Socratic model. However, that requires him to answer as well. That would never happen.

he needs to learn how to do an investigation.  It is not that hard.
 

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 11:21 am

He is on notice.  If he wants answers he will answer follow-up questions and stop with the strike thru when he trying narrowly define the discussion.  

He wants to play pretend that he is a lawyer in court with his direct but is a ****** when it comes to cross.

He is on notice.  If he wants answers he will answer follow-up questions and stop with the strike thru when he trying narrowly define the discussion

You're pathological, ProjectoLass 

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 11:27 am

You're pathological, ProjectoLass

Nah.  If I was pathological I would have hunted you down by now.

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 11:27 am

he needs to learn how to do an investigation.  It is north that hard.

Really?


In how many adversarial proceedings are you allowed to disregard questions, or the determinations of the arbiter?

Everyvtime you run from a question, you lose...

"Follow-up questions"?

You gotta answer the first, **** coward.
 

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 11:28 am

Nah.  If I was pathological I would have hunted you down by now.

One of your pathologies is cowardice.

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 11:31 am

One of your pathologies is cowardice.

Sigh.  You have my pic,my address, a map to my house.  You gotta do better than that, Keyboard Komando.  If you show up, or reciprocate, you then can lecture me on cowardice, Options.

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 11:33 am

Sigh.  You have my pic,my address, a map to my house.  You gotta do better than that, Keyboard Komando.  If you show up, or reciprocate, you then can lecture me on cowardice, Options.

You harbor delusions...

And run from your own words.

It doesn't get more ******, or moron, than that.
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 11:30 am

Really?

In how many adversarial proceedings are you allowed to disregard questions, or the determinations of the arbiter?

Everyvtime you run from a question, you lose...

"Follow-up questions"?

You gotta answer the first, **** coward.

You know what you gotta do.  Only time will time will tell.

Let’s try this.  In that famous pic of yours, with the shotgun, it is unloaded.  Please explain what constitutes an unloaded firearm.

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 11:35 am

You harbor delusions...

And run from your own words.

It doesn't get more ******, or moron, than that.

We’ll see.  That theory of yours is about to severely tested.

As the commercial says, Just Do It.
 

*Huey » 17 Nov 2024, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 11:39 am

We’ll see.  That theory of yours is about to severely tested.

As the commercial says, Just Do It.

Isn't that gonna be YOUR job?