Admit....GUTTED KAKA
Qualities traditionally associated with females?? The qualities associated with females are vaginas, cervixes, wombs, fallopian tubes etc. One of those 4 people in the posted pic has the qualities of a woma, can you NAME her.Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 9:48 pm » wrote: ↑ more gibberish.
if gibberish qualifies..
I have..
Someone who colors their hair and wears makeup.
Here's Webster's
a person with the qualities traditionally associated with females.
You have a serious Issue thing going, ProjectoLass.
Those are Primary Sexual Characteristics, Tiny.*Huey » 18 Nov 2024, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ Qualities traditionally associated with females?? The qualities associated with females are vaginas, cervixes, wombs, fallopian tubes etc. One of those 4 people in the posted pic has the qualities of a woma, can you NAME her.
Nope, you correctly defined a woman and only one of those in the pic qualifies.Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2024, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑ Those are Primary Sexual Characteristics, Tiny.
Stop presuming to say what things are...you're an idiot.
Verbal,*Huey » 18 Nov 2024, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑ Nope, you correctly defined a woman and only one of those in the pic qualifies.
Hoisted, as they say, Binky.
Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2024, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑ Verbal,
Stay in your double digit SAT verbal score lane.
*Huey » 18 Nov 2024, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑ Nope, you correctly defined a woman and only one of those in the pic qualifies.
Hoisted, as they say, Binky.
What is it with you idiots?Hoisted
*Huey » 18 Nov 2024, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑ I know what the **** they say, OCD Asshole.
And I know what makes a woman, ***.
Are these your words?I know what the **** they say, OCD Asshole.
Hoisted, as they say,
Sure...we need to get back to that state by state loaded/unloaded thingOCD Asshole.
Yes PK, they are because my name is on the quote, ****. It was done on purpose. Remeber, I saw HOW off the wall you went the other day when Deezer Did IT. And you did not disappoint.Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2024, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑
Are these your words?
Sure...we need to get back to that state by state loaded/unloaded thing
*Huey » 18 Nov 2024, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑ Yes PK, they are because my name is on the quote, ****. It was done on purpose. Remeber, I saw off the wall you went the other day when Deezer Did. And you did not disappoint.
You don’t want to revisit your latest train wreck at my hands
Not only is that incoherent....it's **** stupid.Remeber, I saw off the wall you went the other day when Deezer Did
a) how would I know what you saw...*Huey » 18 Nov 2024, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑ Thanks, try it now:
Remeber, I saw HOW off the wall you went the other day when Deezer Did IT.
I've defined it 4 times...3 from THE SAME SOURCE YOU USED, YOU **** INBRED IMBECILE.FJB » 18 Nov 2024, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑ YOU ARE **** STUPID... YOU CAN'T EVEN DEFINE THE TERM WOMAN CORRECTLY
Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2024, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑ I've defined it 4 times...3 from THE SAME SOURCE YOU USED, YOU **** INBRED IMBECILE.
I prove you're a liar and you leave for 6 months.
Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2024, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ a) how would I know what you saw...
Oh...yea....the stalky thing....
Never mind
b) post this "off the wall" **** you assert, ProjectoLass
Is this your gibberish?*Huey » 18 Nov 2024, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑ I never said you would see it. I thanked you for pointing out my error and made the correction. You have NO excuses n ow, PK. And no reposts. Simply go back to the thread and see for yearself.
Remeber, I saw off the wall you went the other day when Deezer Did
So we both know you're lying.And no reposts. Simply go back to the thread and see for yearself.