Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

26 minutes ago

The only one asked to consider the question...

Acknowledge that you were answered.

I asked about a Criminal Court... you cant read

Blackvegetable » 47 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

47 minutes ago

Post the thread title.

Was his question answered?

We're done here.

Alli I will say you originally answered unanimously yes.  Then you backtracked and claimed it was In response to a question I asked.  Although you can’t post this mystery question.  

That is why the conditions are what they are.  Answer them and we can move on to crushing your jury finding answer

Just to be clear you are back to saying “unambiguous yes” to this question:

Hey Blackvegetable, was Trump ever convicted of Rape? Yes or No answer.

 

*Huey » Today, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:13 pm

Alli I will say you originally answered unanimously yes.  Then you backtracked and claimed it was In response to a question I asked.  Although you can’t post this mystery question.  

That is why the conditions are what they are.  Answer them and we can move on to crushing your jury finding answer

Just to be clear you are back to saying “unambiguous yes” to this question:

Hey Blackvegetable, was Trump ever convicted of Rape? Yes or No answer.

Now you say less

 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Now you say less

You have the conditions.  Thn we can move on to crushing your civil trial slogans 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Now you say less

Question: How can the dimocrat party ensure transparency and accountability in campaign finances to rebuild public trust after allegations of financial mismanagement?

New Rule!

Rule: I will ask my questions repeatedly until you answer. I never fall for your tactics, such as deflecting, lying, and your other cowardly ****. 
Stipulations: 

• You will need to repost your questions the number of times that I had to repost mine. If I ask 50 times, then you need to ask 50 times before I answer. Fair is fair.
• The rule applies to both of us. Unlike you, I am not a coward. Therefore, I don't break the rules. 
• I will never give a flying **** about your opinion of said rule. 

 

*Huey » Today, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:13 pm

Alli I will say is you originally answered unanimously yes.  Then you backtracked and claimed it was In response to a question I asked.  Although you can’t post this mystery question.  

That is why the conditions are what they are.  Answer them and we can move on to crushing your jury finding answer

Just to be clear you are back to saying “unambiguous yes” to this question:

Hey Blackvegetable, was Trump ever convicted of Rape? Yes or No answer.

@Blackvegetable  

I see you are still running.
 

*Huey » Today, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:18 pm

You have the conditions.  Thn we can move on to crushing your civil trial slogans

This time it's my way.

Your lack of integrity has led to ambiguity.

Duck's thread has been torched.

*Huey » Today, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:26 pm

@Blackvegetable  

I see you are still running.

Post the thread title.

Have I answered the question? 
 

Vegas » Today, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:18 pm

Question: How can the dimocrat party ensure transparency and accountability in campaign finances to rebuild public trust after allegations of financial mismanagement?

New Rule!

I'll keep this Level 1, so you can catch up..

Just point out that the alternative is a Grifter who has been assessed more than 500 million in fraud judgements, and has testified under oath that his signed attestation of net worth are worthless.....and throw in that his auditor walked away from a decades worth of audits....just for **** and giggles.

Level 2 will delve into why you would ask such a stupid question.
 

FJB » Today, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:12 pm

I asked about a Criminal Court... you cant read

Was your question answered, Duck?

Vegas » Today, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:48 pm

Question: How can the dimocrat party ensure transparency and accountability in campaign finances to rebuild public trust after allegations of financial mismanagement?

New Rule!

I'll keep this Level 1, so you can catch up..

Just point out that the alternative is a Grifter who has been assessed more than 500 million in fraud judgements, and has testified under oath that his signed attestation of net worth are worthless.....and throw in that his auditor walked away from a decades worth of audits....just for **** and giggles.

Level 2 will delve into why you would ask such a stupid question.

Blackvegetable » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

24 minutes ago

This time it's my way.

Your lack of integrity has led to ambiguity.

Duck's thread has been torched.

It was your way pertaining to to the strokes challenge you lost.  You also ran from that.  It is you history. Liat.


So no. You have ran from this because you lost.  At this point you are on record as saying Trump was convicted of rape.  You have the conditions.

Blackvegetable » 34 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

34 minutes ago

This time it's my way.

Your lack of integrity has led to ambiguity.

Duck's thread has been torched.

PS. YOU are not to be trusted with a PG thread concerning challenges anyway.  
 

*Huey » 19 Nov 2024, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2024, 3:49 pm

The question, liar, that was out to you is as follows:

Hey Blackvegetable, was Trump ever convicted of Rape? Yes or No answer.

Ya lying lil bitch, the correct answer is No.  you are a non reading waste of a 5 dollar pay day ****. He was never in a criminal trial so he couldn’t be convicted.

When the jury filled out there paperwork the question to them was did she prove trump raped her.  The jury said no.

Shove that list of yours up your ***.

Here is your answer:

There is the question you were asked.

And here is your response:

The answer to the question put to me is unambiguously "yes"...

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”


Acknowledge

Why are you running from your words?  What is this mystery question posted prior to to the question above?  Remeber a week off if you post it, with a link.

viewtopic.php?p=2657366#p2657366


@Blackvegetable  

Blackvegetable » 42 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

42 minutes ago

Was your question answered, Duck?

Was not answered honestly

FJB » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Was not answered honestly

Yup.  He claims he was answering some mystery question he claims I posted. Although the only yes or no I asked him was a repost of yours. He can’t seem to find it. It doesn’t exist.  If he did he was have posted it by now because it would have cost me a week.

That is why he wants to set new conditions and reframe on his thread.  He is one dishonest lying lil bitch.  He is my bitch.

Sumela » 19 Nov 2024, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2024, 11:36 am

He claims he has a 1/4 Jew,  1/4 Negro daughter who is some sort of super intelligent Wonder Woman .
Notice how ALL of the Progressive **** Heads [at this forum] feel the need to make  such grandiose claims about their personal lives and accomplishments...?
One doesn't need a degree in psychology to understand why. 
They all have such fascinating and wonderful lives yet they spend 90% of every waking hour at internet forums.   
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

He claims he has a 1/4 Jew,  1/4 Negro daughter who is some sort of super intelligent Wonder Woman .
Notice how ALL of the Progressive **** Heads [at this forum] feel the need to make  such grandiose claims about their personal lives and accomplishments...?
One doesn't need a degree in psychology to understand why. 
They all have such fascinating and wonderful lives yet they spend 90% of every waking hour at internet forums. 

 
BV is insecure and full of ****.
All that **** about 'its' family is made up.  
 

Sumela » 29 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

29 minutes ago

 
BV is insecure and full of ****.
All that **** about 'its' family is made up.

BV, MM  and Vegas Giants have a very similar M.O..

They need to maintain lots of different accounts too..
They are actually  "playing dolls" like little girls with those additional accounts.   
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

BV, MM  and Vegas Giants have a very similar M.O..

They need to maintain lots of different accounts too..
They are actually  "playing dolls" like little girls with those additional accounts. 

They remind me of this,,,,,