Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 23 Nov 2024, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

23 Nov 2024, 7:18 am

The fact.

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote. He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Before moving on are you ad,itting. I did not ask you a question on this thread prior to to your unambiguous yes” answer ?  

Blackvegetable » 23 Nov 2024, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

23 Nov 2024, 7:18 am

The fact.

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote. He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

PS.  I wanna add to this post:

Before moving on are you admitting. I did not ask you a question on this thread prior to to your unambiguous yes” answer ?  

And to be clear I have two answers from you concerning the question in the OP.  One is yes and one is no.  For the future it would be wise of you to just clarify without your usual drama pompous actions.
 

*Huey » 24 Nov 2024, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑

24 Nov 2024, 11:02 am

PS.  I wanna add to this post:

Before moving on are you admitting. I did not ask you a question on this thread prior to to your unambiguous yes” answer ?  

And to be clear I have two answers from you concerning the question in the OP.  One is yes and one is no.  For the future it would be wise of you to just clarify without your usual drama pompous actions.

You're running from so many words...

Why post more?
 

Blackvegetable » 24 Nov 2024, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

24 Nov 2024, 11:05 am

You're running from so many words...

Why post more?

The moment you clarify what has even asked of you days ago (you are running) I will end your BS about the JURY in the civil trial in one post.

But first you have to man and admit you were wrong. You run around and claim I am lying all over the forum yet you are not man enough to show these lies

AANd when I bust you you run like the lil bitch daddy new.  Bod, lil Bitch,

*Huey » 24 Nov 2024, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

24 Nov 2024, 11:07 am

The moment you clarify what has even asked of you days ago (you are running) I will end your BS about the JURY in the civil trial in one post.

But first you have to man and admit you were wrong. You run around and claim I am lying all over the forum yet you are not man enough to show these lies

AANd when I bust you you run like the lil bitch daddy new.  Bod, lil Bitch,

Early morning meltdown. 

Blackvegetable » 24 Nov 2024, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

24 Nov 2024, 11:08 am

Early morning meltdown.

Nope.  Here is the drill.  Until you clear up your dual answers and admit I admit I ask you no yes or no questions concerning the civil trial all question you ask me (which is thousands) will be referred back to this issue.  Until you man do those two things AS WELL as admit I did not lie.

This is gonna be great.

*Huey » 24 Nov 2024, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

24 Nov 2024, 11:11 am

Nope.  Here is the drill.  Until you clear up your dual answers and admit I admit I ask you no yes or no questions concerning the civil trial all question you ask me (which is thousands) will be referred back to this issue.  Until you man do those two things AS WELL as admit I did not lie.

This is gonna be great.

You have lies to which you must admit.

Blackvegetable » 24 Nov 2024, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Nov 2024, 12:29 pm

You have lies to which you must admit.

After you answer those questions you may post these lies.  This is how it will work from here on out.  Keep runnin, Daddy’s lil cumbucket

*Huey » 24 Nov 2024, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Nov 2024, 12:34 pm

After you answer those questions you may post these lies.  This is how it will work from here on out.  Keep runnin, Daddy’s lil cumbucket

Your lie came first, Frediñho 

 

Blackvegetable » 24 Nov 2024, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Nov 2024, 12:36 pm

Your lie came first, Frediñho 

 

What you deny today your ancestry denied since dawn of civilization.

whose the fool and who we are trying to fool whom here, today? You base facts on human behavior recorded since dawn of civilization I describe evolving population since inception of original 16 great great grandparent generation gap arrived native to this atmosphere thousands of generations before dawn of civilization took on the New World Order semantics.

Blackvegetable » 24 Nov 2024, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Nov 2024, 12:36 pm

Your lie came first, Frediñho

Nope.  I will crush your civil trial **** in one post AFTER you confirm your answer in the OP and admit I did. Not ask you a yeas or no question concerning the civil trail.  You words have been posted at least 7 times,

*Huey » 24 Nov 2024, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Nov 2024, 12:38 pm

Nope.  I will crush your civil trial **** in one post AFTER you confirm your answer in the OP and admit I did. Not ask you a yeas or no question concerning the civil trail.  You words have been posted at least 7 times,

You balance out sides taken over the issue showing how many interpretations exist within the whole population alive globally here, today..

Blackvegetable » 24 Nov 2024, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Nov 2024, 12:36 pm

Your lie came first, Frediñho

Since you are a ****** who refuses to admit he is wrong here is the ONE post I told you would crush your argument once and for all:

I said:

The answer is a resounding NO and no jury found him liable for rape.

1.  It has been established that NO just has convicted him of rape in a criminal trial.

(You have given two different answers to that)

2.  No JURY has issued a finding that Trump is liable for rape:

viewtopic.php?p=2659175#p2659175

The very fist question in the official finding is:

Did Ms Carroll prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that

1. Mr. Trump raped Ms. Carroll.  

The answer is NO.

As I said, no JURY has found him liable for rape.

Game.  Set.  **** Match.

No questions until you admit you were wrong about way I posted.

Until you admit I did not ask you a question concerning the civil trial prior to your yes answer and you clarify you answer to the question in the OP, no questions.
 

*Huey » 24 Nov 2024, 3:07 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Nov 2024, 3:07 pm

Since you are a ****** who refuses to admit he is wrong here is the ONE post I told you would crush your argument once and for all:

I said:

The answer is a resounding NO and no jury found him liable for rape.

1.  It has been established that NO just has convicted him of rape in a criminal trial.

(You have given two different answers to that)

2.  No JURY has issued a finding that Trump is liable for rape:

viewtopic.php?p=2659175#p2659175

The very fist question in the official finding is:

Did Ms Carroll prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that

1. Mr. Trump raped Ms. Carroll.  

The answer is NO.

As I said, no JURY has found him liable for rape.

Game.  Set.  **** Match.

No questions until you admit you were wrong about way I posted.

Until you admit I did not ask you a question concerning the civil trial prior to your yes answer and you clarify you answer to the question in the OP, no questions.

 

Blackvegetable » 24 Nov 2024, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Nov 2024, 3:26 pm

It is done.  No JURY found him liable for rape.  Doesn't matter what the judge's interpretation was.  The jury said no to rape.  Can't be any plainer.

Now, ONCE AGAIN, although you did not uphold you end (no surprise) I answered your question and curbstomped you cum bucket ***.

You may ramble all you like.  I won.

*Huey » 24 Nov 2024, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Nov 2024, 3:32 pm

It is done.  No JURY found him liable for rape.  Doesn't matter what the judge's interpretation was.  The jury said no to rape.  Can't be any plainer.

Now, ONCE AGAIN, although you did not uphold you end (no surprise) I answered your question and curbstomped you cum bucket ***.

You may ramble all you like.  I won.

Why does the judge's "interpretation" not matter?

Grifty is on the hook for the 2 million.

Digital penetration is rape.

Case closed.

Here's your L.

Blackvegetable » 24 Nov 2024, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Nov 2024, 3:35 pm

Why does the judge's "interpretation" not matter?

Grifty is on the hook for the 2 million.

Digital penetration is rape.

Case closed.

Here's your L.

I would like to remind you that this is about what the Jury said.  No jury, when directly asked, agreed Trump raped her.

No more replies with ST will be acknowledged or responded to.  You need to learn how to act like a man. 

*Huey » 24 Nov 2024, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Nov 2024, 3:37 pm

I would like to remind you that this is about what the Jury said.  No jury, when directly asked, agreed Trump raped her.

No more replies with ST will be acknowledged or responded to.  You need to learn how to act like a man.

No case...again

It is about THE VERDICT. 


 

Blackvegetable » 24 Nov 2024, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Nov 2024, 3:42 pm

No case...again

It is about THE VERDICT.

My case is made.  No JURY, when asked, found Trump liable for rape.  Remember, this is not about what the Judge, this is all about what the jury went on record as saying.

And I am right.

This is the last post that I will answer on this topic, or any question you ask on any topic, until you meet the conditions that prove you are a man who is not afraid of his words and admit he was wrong.  Or you can show where you clarified which answer to the OP is the one you stand by.  And for a week off on my part show exactly where I asked you a question concerning the CIVIL trial prior to your "Unambiguously yes" answer.

Those are conditions.  Have been for 5 days.  You ran.

 

*Huey » 24 Nov 2024, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Nov 2024, 3:46 pm

My case is made.  No JURY, when asked, found Trump liable for rape. Remember, this is not about what the Judge, this is all about what the jury went on record as saying.

And I am right.

This is the last post that I will answer on this topic, or any question you ask on any topic, until you meet the conditions that prove you are a man who is not afraid of his words and admit he was wrong.  Or you can show where you clarified which answer to the OP is the one you stand by.  And for a week off on my part show exactly where I asked you a question concerning the CIVIL trial prior to your "Unambiguously yes" answer.

Those are conditions.  Have been for 5 days.  You ran.

Is Digital Penetration "rape"?

Run.