Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 26 Nov 2024, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 11:48 am

Tiny,

You ran from the question.....Your excuses never matter.

Only retold.....and you know that is a violation of your rule on Format.

The burden of proof is YOURS, Sheilagh

Tiny,

There is nothing in it for me because you welsh......

You run from your own incoherence....

Temperature's risin....barometer's gettin' low....

According to all sources, Tiny's about to blow.....

Seven,

I did show I asked you no yes or no question prior to you unambiguously yes answer.

This is **** hilarious.  You are whining about me not answering your questions which BS as you run and hide from questions and your words.  I answered your questions prior to that.

You have a great day!

*Huey » 26 Nov 2024, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 11:53 am

Seven,

I did show I asked you no yes or no question prior to you unambiguously yes answer.

This is **** hilarious.  You are whining about me not answering your questions which BS as you run and hide from questions and your words.  I answered your questions prior to that.

You have a great day!

Have I answered the yes/no question of the OP?


 

Blackvegetable » 26 Nov 2024, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 12:26 pm

Have I answered the yes/no question of the OP?

So the second answer is the one you are going with.  Now all you have left is to tell us what the first was answer to.  Contrary to your lie I did not ask you a yes or no question about the Civil Trial.

Once you admit that your question privileges will be restore.

This is hilarious! Duck finally gets the 'tribute thread' of his putrid life, and BV scatters his pea brains all over the hiway!              
 

*Huey » 26 Nov 2024, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 12:35 pm

So the second answer is the one you are going with.  Now all you have left is to tell us what the first was answer to.  Contrary to your lie I did not ask you a yes or no question about the Civil Trial.

Once you admit that your question privileges will be restore.

No, I don't...leave each in context and everything will be illuminated. 

 

Blackvegetable » 26 Nov 2024, 1:08 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 1:08 pm

No, I don't...leave each in context and everything will be illuminated.

Sorry, that doesn't cut it.

*Huey » 19 Nov 2024, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2024, 3:28 pm

Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2024, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2024, 11:34 am

Before I answer, I want you to confess that you won't answer a question in return.

No need.  The answer is a resounding NO and no jury found him liable for rape.

 

 

*Huey » 19 Nov 2024, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2024, 3:49 pm

Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2024, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2024, 3:40 pm

No...that's a lie.

To understand why, you'd need to know the facts as detailed by Judge Kaplan.

Because he was the presiding judge, he held as follows..

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

The question, liar, that was out to you is as follows:

Hey Blackvegetable, was Trump ever convicted of Rape? Yes or No answer.

Ya lying lil bitch, the correct answer is No.  you are a non reading waste of a 5 dollar pay day ****. He was never in a criminal trial so he couldn’t be convicted.

When the jury filled out there paperwork the question to them was did she prove trump raped her.  The jury said no.

Shove that list of yours up your ***.    

 

 

*Huey » 19 Nov 2024, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2024, 4:37 pm

Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2024, 4:31 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2024, 4:31 pm

Do you recall if these are your words, reposted directly above my comment?

Again, the answer to the question put to you is NO.

After you acknowledge Trump was NEVER convicted of rape, was not subject to a criminal trial about Carrol, we can move on to what I added.  

And I suggest you read the entire post I entered because it talks about the fact a jury did not find liable for rape.

Good ahead, try me.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2024, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2024, 4:55 pm

*Huey » 19 Nov 2024, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2024, 4:37 pm

Again, the answer to the question put to you is NO.

After you acknowledge Trump was NEVER convicted of rape, was not subject to a criminal trial about Carrol, we can move on to what I added.  

And I suggest you read the entire post I entered because it talks about the fact a jury did not find liable for rape.

Good ahead, try me.

The answer to the question put to me is unambiguously "yes"...

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”


Acknowledge 

 

No question about the civil trial was put to you prior to that answer.  Try again or admit your were wrong. Or post this mystery question and I will take week off.

*Huey » 26 Nov 2024, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 1:19 pm

No question about the civil trial was put to you prior to that answer.  Try again or admit your were wrong. Or post this mystery question and I will take week off.

Post the OP.

Blackvegetable » 26 Nov 2024, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 2:12 pm

Post the OP.

Been done many times.  Plus, that is a demand.  You don’t those right now.  You have the record, in context.  Post that question, PK, the one you said was posed to you about Ruthie civil trial or admit you are now lying.

*Huey » 26 Nov 2024, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 1:16 pm

Sorry, that doesn't cut it.

It certainly does.

Isn't that why you always insist on it when being quoted verbatim?
 

*Huey » 26 Nov 2024, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 2:14 pm

Been done many times.  Plus, that is a demand.  You don’t those right now.  You have the record, in context.  Post that question, PK, the one you said was posed to you about Ruthie civil trial or admit you are now lying.

Have you done so?

Not incidentally.
 

*Huey » 26 Nov 2024, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 1:19 pm

No question about the civil trial was put to you prior to that answer.  Try again or admit your were wrong. Or post this mystery question and I will take week off.

No need.  The answer is a resounding NO and no jury found him liable for rape.

This statement is false.

Blackvegetable » 26 Nov 2024, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 2:14 pm

*Huey » 26 Nov 2024, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 1:16 pm

Sorry, that doesn't cut it.

It certainly does.

Isn't that why you always insist on it when being quoted verbatim?
 

 

You were quoted verbatim and in context in this post:

viewtopic.php?p=2660988#p2660988

You are lying again.  Now post this question and shut the ****.

Blackvegetable » 26 Nov 2024, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 2:16 pm

*Huey » 26 Nov 2024, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 2:14 pm

Been done many times.  Plus, that is a demand.  You don’t those right now.  You have the record, in context.  Post that question, PK, the one you said was posed to you about Ruthie civil trial or admit you are now lying.

Have you done so?

Not incidentally.
 

 

I see strike thru.

Blackvegetable » 26 Nov 2024, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 2:18 pm

*Huey » 26 Nov 2024, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 1:19 pm

No question about the civil trial was put to you prior to that answer.  Try again or admit your were wrong. Or post this mystery question and I will take week off.

No need.  The answer is a resounding NO and no jury found him liable for rape.

This statement is false.

 

Although I already proved that statement true using the Jury finding (we are not talking about the judge) that is not a question that was posed to you.

Either post the question you claim I asked you concerning the civil trial (prior to your unambiguously yes answer) and I take a week off OR admit you were wrong then and are not lying about it.




 

*Huey » 26 Nov 2024, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 1:19 pm

No question about the civil trial was put to you prior to that answer.  Try again or admit your were wrong. Or post this mystery question and I will take week off.

No need.  The answer is a resounding NO and no jury found him liable for rape.

Is this statement a lie?

*Huey » 26 Nov 2024, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 2:26 pm

You were quoted verbatim and in context in this post:

viewtopic.php?p=2660988#p2660988

You are lying again.  Now post this question and shut the ****.

I see strike thru.

Although I already proved that statement true using the Jury finding (we are not talking about the judge) that is not a question that was posed to you.

Either post the question you claim I asked you concerning the civil trial (prior to your unambiguously yes answer) and I take a week off OR admit you were wrong then and are not lying about it.

You can't focus and never answer questions....you even run from your own words.

Blackvegetable » 26 Nov 2024, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 2:28 pm

Is this statement a lie?

We will get to that, and all of your questions, AFTER you admit you you were not asked about the civil trial.

You were words from the repost above:

The answer to the question put to me is unambiguously "yes"...

Where is the question.  All you gotta do Seven, is either post that question and I take a week off or you admit you wrong then and lying now,

Be a man!

Blackvegetable » 26 Nov 2024, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 2:31 pm

You can't focus and never answer questions....you even run from your own words.

Unlike you I have posted my own words.  YOU have been running from these words for seven days.  It you PK **** all over again

The answer to the question put to me is unambiguously "yes"...

What question about the civil trial did I put to you that invoked that answer?  Once you are honest this you get question privileges.  

*Huey » 26 Nov 2024, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 2:34 pm

Unlike you I have posted my own words.  YOU have been running from these words for seven days.  It you PK **** all over again

The answer to the question put to me is unambiguously "yes"...

What question about the civil trial did I put to you that invoked that answer?  Once you are honest this you get question privileges.

Unlike you I have posted my own words.

Why do you always lie?

YOU have been running from these words for seven days.  It you PK **** all over again

Tedious Tiny,

You can't post any false statements on my part...I've posted several of yours.

What question about the civil trial did I put to you that invoked that answer?  

Not that this will put an end to it...

I have directly and unambiguously answered the question in the OP.

My stand is crystal clear.

I correctly called out your assertion as false.

At some point I lost track of your numerous diversions and referred to your assertion as a question. 

That is an entirely different matter from you running from an assertion so clearly at odds with reality that you were obliged to assert the irrelevance of the presiding judge. 

Nod, Coward

*Huey » 26 Nov 2024, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 2:32 pm

We will get to that, and all of your questions, AFTER you admit you you were not asked about the civil trial.

You were words from the repost above:

The answer to the question put to me is unambiguously "yes"...

Where is the question.  All you gotta do Seven, is either post that question and I take a week off or you admit you wrong then and lying now,

Be a man!

:rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:  

Blackvegetable » 26 Nov 2024, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 2:48 pm

Why do you always lie?

Tedious Tiny,

You can't post any false statements on my part...I've posted several of yours.

Not that this will put an end to it...

I have directly and unambiguously answered the question in the OP.

My stand is crystal clear.

I correctly called out your assertion as false.

At some point I lost track of your numerous diversions and referred to your assertion as a question. 

That is an entirely different matter from you running from an assertion so clearly at odds with reality that you were obliged to assert the irrelevance of the presiding judge. 

Nod, Coward

You can't post any false statements on my part...I've posted several of yours.

Your false statement:

The answer to the question put to me is unambiguously "yes"...

No, the question put to you was 

Hey Blackvegetable, was Trump ever convicted of Rape? Yes or No answer.