Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=92389
You're just waiting to find your big girl capris.
Tiny,*Huey » 04 Dec 2024, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Keep running, Fifteen. Just tell us what question you were answering. Covered is not the same as answering. You **** up and your are not man enough to admit it.
Nah, get rid of PG and I will CONSIDER it, Fifteen. And yes, I will presume to tell you whatever I like. Nod!Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
Don't think of presuming to tell me what suffices for an answer.
If you have a question, stop running like the little quimmie that you are and get your flabby loins over to
https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=92389
My family went to pick up two of my brothers at the airport returning from Vietnam*GHETTOBLASTER » 04 Dec 2024, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Which one of your lisping and ponytailed college professors did you look up to the most...?
The "Humanities" professor...?
Did ALL of your lisping and ponytailed professors urge you cowardly draft dodgers to go to the airports to spit on returning GIs...or did you bed wetting cowards come up with that idea on your own...?
I'll let you obsess over the exact amount of TROOPS WHO DID GET SPIT ON while I sit here confidently knowing that it did happen.Mrkelly » 04 Dec 2024, 5:22 pm » wrote: ↑ My family went to pick up two of my brothers at the airport returning from Vietnam
People spitting on the troops is a myth
Im sure there is a video or two that show idiots doing so
but it is still a myth that MANY people did
no obsessing*GHETTOBLASTER » 04 Dec 2024, 5:31 pm » wrote: ↑ I'll let you obsess over the exact amount of TROOPS WHO DID GET SPIT ON while I sit here confidently knowing that it did happen.
Wanna bet the people who felt the need to create the Wikipedia page that claims this was a myth are a bunch of bed wetting, draft dodging Foreskin Chompers...?
All you have is your anecdotal experience and your feelings but no hard facts of any sort.Mrkelly » 04 Dec 2024, 5:35 pm » wrote: ↑ no obsessing
just stating facts
the war lords want you to believe that it is true
Now, how did that make you feel?Cannonpointer » 03 Dec 2024, 9:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Lawfare.
Trumped up show trials.
Election interference.
I know chicks don't have dicks.
You think they do. You told us you believe that - many times.
One would think you would capitalize on your humiliation - use it to grow, smarten up.
Day 16.Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2024, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑ The answer to the question put to me is unambiguously "yes"...
He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
Acknowledge
Blackvegetable » 27 Nov 2024, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑ I made a point of not having asked you...because we both know you'd lie
*Huey » 05 Dec 2024, 5:12 am » wrote: ↑ Day 16.
So if that is not the answer what question are you answering that was put to you concerning the civil trial prior that post? Remember, if you post it I am off a week. If there was one there you would have posted it by now. All that leaves is you admitting you were wrong and have been lying about, plus your public apology
What if you're lying about believing it.
denier, not liar as he truly believes life isn't self evident time existing within each next heartbeat 24/7. His intellectual mind is a supernatural entities beyond living in plain sight.
Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2024, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑ The answer to the question put to me is unambiguously "yes"...
He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
Acknowledge
The only question put to you to the point of your answer was in the OP. You answered yes.Blackvegetable
![]()
This is why you sleep in the utility room.
"It wasn't a real tribute thread....(....sob....)"
You can't find me saying he was "convicted", in fact, I clearly and unambiguously have stated to the contrary and have consistently understood the definition you remain unable to grasp.
A) you shouldn't be tagging while wearing the ********Huey » 05 Dec 2024, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑
The only question put to you to the point of your answer was in the OP. You answered yes.
@Blackvegetable
Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2024, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑ A) you shouldn't be tagging while wearing the *******
B) covered.
I posted your lie and can post more...*Huey » 05 Dec 2024, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑ If I am lying what question were you replying to from me?
Post that and you can do your victory lap.
You have not posted the question. So, until you do, you HAVE NOT answered the question in the OP. One of each does not qualifyBlackvegetable » 05 Dec 2024, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑ I posted your lie and can post more...
But you clearly owe a public apology.
you had something missing. fifyBuck Naked » 05 Dec 2024, 6:45 am » wrote: ↑ remember veggie it’s not a lie if you believe it is possible.