Liberal Forum

*Huey » 05 Dec 2024, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 9:43 am

You have not posted the question.  So, until you do, you HAVE NOT answered the question in the OP.  One of each does not qualify

I have posted your lie.

The public apology is YOUR requirement.

Now it's your obligation 
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2024, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 9:47 am

I have posted your lie.

The public apology is YOUR requirement.

Now it's your obligation

I posted  no lie on Nov 19th.  When you said this:

Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2024, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑
19 Nov 2024, 4:55 pm
The answer to the question put to me is unambiguously "yes"...

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Acknowledge

what question were you answering that was put to you.  This is day 16. 

*Huey » 05 Dec 2024, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 9:55 am

I posted  no lie on Nov 19th.  When you said this:

what question were you answering that was put to you.  This is day 16.

Covered.

This is a lie..

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2024, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 9:59 am

Covered.

This is a lie..





 

No, that is not a lie.  That post was made Nov 22nd.  Not the 19th.

If you covered why are not whining for me to leave the forum for a week?  Because there was no question other than what was in the OP, meaning you still have not given a yes or no answer to that question.  
 

*Huey » 05 Dec 2024, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 10:02 am

No, that is not a lie.  That post was made Nov 22nd.  Not the 19th.

If you covered why are not whining for me to leave the forum for a week?  Because there was no question other than what was in the OP, meaning you still have not given a yes or no answer to that question.

That post is unambiguous evidence that you lie.

Nod.
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2024, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 10:11 am

That post is unambiguous evidence that you lie.

Nod.

Nah, ity is a sign that 3 days of lying on your part you needed to create a diversion.  And I have owned up to that mistake.  You, as of yet, are still running.  

31stArrival » 05 Dec 2024, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 9:47 am

you had something missing. fify

Nuttin was missing 

*Huey » 05 Dec 2024, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 10:12 am

Nah, ity is a sign that 3 days of lying on your part you needed to create a diversion.  And I have owned up to that mistake.  You, as of yet, are still running.

You can't find my "lie".

You lie about your lie.
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2024, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 10:16 am

You can't find my "lie".

You lie about your lie.

That's over.  I am waiting foryou to tell us what question you were answering here:

Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2024, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑
19 Nov 2024, 4:55 pm
The answer to the question put to me is unambiguously "yes"...

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Acknowledge

*Huey » 05 Dec 2024, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 10:18 am

That's over.  I am waiting foryou to tell us what question you were answering here:

Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2024, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑
19 Nov 2024, 4:55 pm
The answer to the question put to me is unambiguously "yes"...

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Acknowledge

You can't skip over the absence of evidence. 

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2024, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 10:25 am

You can't skip over the absence of evidence. 

 

There is nothing ambiguous about this:

The answer to the question put to me is unambiguously "yes"...

What question?  That is one of your lies.  
 

Buck Naked » 05 Dec 2024, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 10:14 am

Nuttin was missing 

Actually you did but factually you stayed on message.

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2024, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 7:33 am

What if you're lying about believing it.

What about it?

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2024, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 10:25 am

You can't skip over the absence of evidence. 

Circumstantial evidence is conjecture done statistically comparing all the parts against the whole process involving everything evolving forward here(this universal position) now.

Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2024, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2024, 4:55 pm

The answer to the question put to me is unambiguously "yes"...

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Acknowledge

Post 75:

Hey Blackvegetable, was Trump ever convicted of Rape? Yes or No answer.

You answered in post 79.  

*Huey » 05 Dec 2024, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 12:26 pm

Post 75:

Hey Blackvegetable, was Trump ever convicted of Rape? Yes or No answer.

You answered in post 79.

Did you post your apology?

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2024, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 12:27 pm

Did you post your apology?

 

I did.  If you missed it that's on you.  Odd, three days after running from that you demand you claim I lied on another topic.  Nice Diverion.

So as of right now your first answer is yes, Trump was convicted of rape. 
 

*Huey » 05 Dec 2024, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 12:31 pm

I did.  If you missed it that's on you.  Odd, three days after running from that you demand you claim I lied on another topic.  Nice Diverion.

So as of right now your first answer is yes, Trump was convicted of rape.

No...

Because you lie.

 
 

BV IS A PATHOLOGICAL BITCH BOY LIAR

BuckNaked » 05 Dec 2024, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 11:52 am

What about it?

Then it's fraud