Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2024, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 1:22 pm

Then it's fraud

we’re taking bout lies 

BV is a pathological liar

Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2024, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2024, 4:55 pm

*Huey » 19 Nov 2024, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2024, 4:37 pm

Again, the answer to the question put to you is NO.

After you acknowledge Trump was NEVER convicted of rape, was not subject to a criminal trial about Carrol, we can move on to what I added.  

And I suggest you read the entire post I entered because it talks about the fact a jury did not find liable for rape.

Good ahead, try me.

The answer to the question put to me is unambiguously "yes"...

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”


Acknowledge 

 

Dy 17 of the BV Marathon.   

What question were you answering with your unambiguously yes answer.  As of right now reading the thread to that point it appears that you are saying that yes, Trump was convicted of rape.

 

*Huey » 06 Dec 2024, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Dec 2024, 1:00 pm

Dy 17 of the BV Marathon.   

What question were you answering with your unambiguously yes answer.  As of right now reading the thread to that point it appears that you are saying that yes, Trump was convicted of rape.

https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=92389

Blackvegetable » 06 Dec 2024, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Dec 2024, 1:09 pm

https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=92389

That’s not the question you were answering.  That is the diversion you created 3 days later after you realized you **** up but were not man enough to admit it.

*Huey » 06 Dec 2024, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Dec 2024, 1:18 pm

That’s not the question you were answering.  That is the diversion you created 3 days later after you realized you **** up but were not man enough to admit it.

Covered.

If any doubt remains, stop running scairt...
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Dec 2024, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Dec 2024, 2:56 pm

Covered.

If any doubt remains, stop running scairt...

I will decide when it is covered.  I notice you never say you POSTED the question you were answering.  Man up, coward.  Just once in your life.  

I am not running.  You know exactly where I am.  You also know where I was during day the week of Sep 11th 2022.  About 30 miles from you.  You were hiding scairt. 

*Huey » 06 Dec 2024, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Dec 2024, 3:27 pm

I will decide when it is covered.  I notice you never say you POSTED the question you were answering.  Man up, coward.  Just once in your life.  

I am not running.  You know exactly where I am.  You also know where I was during day the week of Sep 11th 2022.  About 30 miles from you.  You were hiding scairt.

No, you don't. 

Remember, not only CAN you play stupid forever, you don't possess the shame not to.

I am not running

This thread is done...my answer to the OP is clear and unambigious....if you don't get it, there is another thread at which you are free to ask the same question. Assuming you are man enough to agree to the conditions. 

I bet you aren't. 

BV THE POS LIBERAL SHILL IS STILL RUNNING FROM ANSWERING A SIMPLE QUESTION

Blackvegetable » 06 Dec 2024, 7:09 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Dec 2024, 7:09 pm

No, you don't. 

Remember, not only CAN you play stupid forever, you don't possess the shame not to.

This thread is done...my answer to the OP is clear and unambigious....if you don't get it, there is another thread at which you are free to ask the same question. Assuming you are man enough to agree to the conditions. 

I bet you aren't.

 I am not saying you did not EVENTUALLY answer the OP days later.  I am asking you what question you were answering with your unambiguously yes answer.

This is why EVERYONE deems you a liar and A POS.

Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2024, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2024, 4:55 pm

The answer to the question put to me is unambiguously "yes"...

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Acknowledge

Day 18


What question were you answering that was put to you?
 

*Huey » 07 Dec 2024, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2024, 12:11 pm

Day 18

What question were you answering that was put to you?

https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=92389

Blackvegetable » 07 Dec 2024, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2024, 12:25 pm

https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=92389

That is not the question you were answering EIGHTEEN days ago.  Keep running.

Blackvegetable » 26 Nov 2024, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 2:48 pm

Why do you always lie?

Tedious Tiny,

You can't post any false statements on my part...I've posted several of yours.

Not that this will put an end to it...

I have directly and unambiguously answered the question in the OP.

My stand is crystal clear.

I correctly called out your assertion as false.

At some point I lost track of your numerous diversions and referred to your assertion as a question. 

That is an entirely different matter from you running from an assertion so clearly at odds with reality that you were obliged to assert the irrelevance of the presiding judge. 

Nod, Coward

Bump
 

*Huey » 07 Dec 2024, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2024, 12:11 pm

Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2024, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2024, 4:55 pm

The answer to the question put to me is unambiguously "yes"...

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Acknowledge

Day 18


What question were you answering that was put to you?
 

 

I am simply posting your own words.  That is not a lie.  And I am asking you what question posed to you were you answering.  The only question posed to you prior to that answer is the one in the OP.  That is not lie.  Remember, this day 18.

Blackvegetable » 07 Dec 2024, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2024, 1:43 pm

Blackvegetable » 26 Nov 2024, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2024, 2:48 pm

Why do you always lie?

Tedious Tiny,

You can't post any false statements on my part...I've posted several of yours.

Not that this will put an end to it...

I have directly and unambiguously answered the question in the OP.

My stand is crystal clear.

I correctly called out your assertion as false.

At some point I lost track of your numerous diversions and referred to your assertion as a question. 

That is an entirely different matter from you running from an assertion so clearly at odds with reality that you were obliged to assert the irrelevance of the presiding judge. 

Nod, Coward

Bump
 

 

 

*Huey » 07 Dec 2024, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2024, 2:32 pm

I am simply posting your own words.  That is not a lie.  And I am asking you what question posed to you were you answering.  The only question posed to you prior to that answer is the one in the OP.  That is not lie.  Remember, this day 18.

You've been lying about it not being covered.

Note the text in bold.
 

FJB » 19 Nov 2024, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2024, 11:26 am

Hey Blackvegetable, was Trump ever convicted of Rape? Yes or No answer.
 
 

 

I have yet to see the question you were supposedly answering OR your admission that you were wrong, that no question on the CIVIL Trial was asked to that point.  The question posed to you is in the OP.

Blackvegetable » 07 Dec 2024, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2024, 2:44 pm

*Huey » 07 Dec 2024, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2024, 2:32 pm

I am simply posting your own words.  That is not a lie.  And I am asking you what question posed to you were you answering.  The only question posed to you prior to that answer is the one in the OP.  That is not lie.  Remember, this day 18.

You've been lying about it not being covered.

Note the text in bold.
 

 

ANd, furthermore, I never said it wasn't covered.  I said you have yet to post the question you were answering.

*Huey » 07 Dec 2024, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2024, 2:53 pm

I have yet to see the question you were supposedly answering OR your admission that you were wrong, that no question on the CIVIL Trial was asked to that point.  The question posed to you is in the OP.

ANd, furthermore, I never said it wasn't covered.  I said you have yet to post the question you were answering.

ANd, furthermore, I never said it wasn't covered.  I said you have yet to post the question you were answering.

These statements are mutually exclusive..

you're an idiot.

Blackvegetable » 07 Dec 2024, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2024, 3:03 pm

These statements are mutually exclusive..

you're an idiot.

Let me know when you get your balls back.

*Huey » 07 Dec 2024, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2024, 3:05 pm

Let me know when you get your balls back.

There's no issue with my balls, Runny.

https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=92389