ProjectoLass,*Huey » 19 Dec 2024, 5:17 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm not. More lies. Is my name on the quote link of the words that have your panties in a twist, Mary?
I did. If my name is on the quote link they are my words. Is my name on the quote link, Richard? If so, make your point.Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2024, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑ ProjectoLass,
Asking you to acknowledge your words always gets your panties in a twist.
No...*Huey » 19 Dec 2024, 5:47 pm » wrote: ↑ I did. If my name is on the quote link they are my words. Is my name on the quote link, Richard? If so, make your point.
Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2024, 5:49 pm » wrote: ↑ No...
It's not Conditional, Tiny.
It's "Yes", "No" or "Don’t recall".
Nod.
That is not the problem.*Huey » 19 Dec 2024, 5:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Since you are incapable of using a link or the quote function it is not a yes or no answer. If my name is in the quote box they are my words. That is my acknowledging them if that is the case. And I am not placing conditions. You are lying about that, Mary.
If you choose to post my words in this fashion that is the standard answer you will get each time. Acknowledge that.
If you post the link to those words, as a man would, this go a lot faster. CONTEXT is everything, not VERBATIM.
See you tomorrow to continue curb stomping you.
Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2024, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑ That is not the problem.
The problem is that doing so makes no practical difference...it is just you being bitchy because you've been burned by your own words.
Nice try...a jury did not find him guilty of rape. Keep lying.
Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2024, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑ That is not the problem.
The problem is that doing so makes no practical difference...it is just you being bitchy because you've been burned by your own words.
Why would I read that tantrum?*Huey » 20 Dec 2024, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑ Richard, you may try that again without the ST.
Since you are incapable of using a link or the quote function it is not a yes or no answer. If my name is in the quote box they are my words. That is my acknowledging them if that is the case. And I am not placing conditions. You are lying about that, Mary.
If you choose to post my words in this fashion that is the standard answer you will get each time. Acknowledge that.
If you post the link to those words, as a man would, this go a lot faster. CONTEXT is everything, not VERBATIM.
See you tomorrow to continue curb stomping you.
Richard, you may try that again without the ST.
Since you are incapable of using a link or the quote function it is not a yes or no answer. If my name is in the quote box they are my words. That is my acknowledging them if that is the case. And I am not placing conditions. You are lying about that, Mary.
If you choose to post my words in this fashion that is the standard answer you will get each time. Acknowledge that.
If you post the link to those words, as a man would, this go a lot faster. CONTEXT is everything, not VERBATIM.
See you tomorrow to continue curb stomping you.
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. "Context is everything.....". A mind recites context daily while evolving uniquely positioned as specifically alive 24/7. A personal brain navigates living in a series parallel situation of adapting while occupying alive in an ever changing form, daily proportionately living now.*Huey » 20 Dec 2024, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑ Richard, you may try that again without the ST.
Since you are incapable of using a link or the quote function it is not a yes or no answer. If my name is in the quote box they are my words. That is my acknowledging them if that is the case. And I am not placing conditions. You are lying about that, Mary.
If you choose to post my words in this fashion that is the standard answer you will get each time. Acknowledge that.
If you post the link to those words, as a man would, this go a lot faster. CONTEXT is everything, not VERBATIM.
See you tomorrow to continue curb stomping you.
I did. You haven’t. Is my name on the quote link? Waiting on you, pumpkin.
No...you didn't.*Huey » 20 Dec 2024, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑ I did. You haven’t. Is my name on the quote link? Waiting on you, pumpkin.
You responded....with a reposting of your tantrum.
Blackvegetable » 20 Dec 2024, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑ You responded....with a reposting of your tantrum.
It's different.
Not this again, Tiny..*Huey » 20 Dec 2024, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑ No tantrum. You are not capable of making me have one. My answer was, and still is, if my name is on the quote link then it is my quote, my words.
The question YOU REFUSE to answer is "is my name on the quote link". The link you are afraid to post.
Blackvegetable » 20 Dec 2024, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑Not this again, Tiny..*Huey » 20 Dec 2024, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑ No tantrum. You are not capable of making me have one. My answer was, and still is, if my name is on the quote link then it is my quote, my words.
The question YOU REFUSE to answer is "is my name on the quote link". The link you are afraid to post.
Not while you are running from your own rule.
Please..