Liberal Forum

Two If By Tea » 52 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

52 minutes ago

Can ya break that dowm "Plain English" Too

Dont get me wrong ya "Good" in My Book so Far.

I also "'Respect" Ya too ya gotta "Mind" too

cannot be done since I am describing series parallel condition of spontaneously different simultaneously per individually alive in specificity with inhabiting space in the same moment.

Zeets2 » Today, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:53 am

Were you too fooled to have lost the ability to defend your ignorance and your repeated lies?
If not, why can't you refute the definitions of wealth that I've posted repeatedly from knowledgeable sources?

 

I stopped perusing your links when the first one agreed with me that you are middle class, rube. Don't BRAG about your ability to Gish Gallop me. I don't play that ****.

I have no time for mouthy skirts.

31stArrival » Today, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:50 pm

Wow, hired thug intimidator like Taipan being a mercenary for dictators and democracies protecting human rights to deny life daily and punish anyone resisting rule of law in both dictatorships and democracies defending God and country. the left and right hands of God molding ancestries into typecast people cradle to grave.

I undertand the manifested bigger picture of New World Order..

Taipan was a talker. 
 

Cannonpointer » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Taipan was a talker. 
 

and you walk the talk. Again my instinctive accuracy is spot on.

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 6:27 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:27 pm

I stopped perusing your links when the first one agreed with me that you are middle class, rube. Don't BRAG about your ability to Gish Gallop me. I don't play that ****.

I have no time for mouthy skirts.

Well, maybe if you HAD read the entire link, you would have seen the category that shows me to be NOT ONLY in the top 20%, but also in the top 5%, and the top 1% of earners.

But of course, one you think you've found something that defends your own stupidity, you stop reading!
Not surprising that a dope like you never earned anywhere near those categories.

So permit me to shove the quotes up your dumb *** again in closing.  Maybe this time you'll read the entire chart:

What is wealthy in New Jersey?
To be in the top 20% of earners in New Jersey, one needs to make at least $181,484 annually. To be in the top 5%, an income of at least $250,000 is required. The income controlled by the top 5% in New Jersey is 22.9%, which is the 16th highest.

What is the 1% wealth in New Jersey?
To be in the top 1% of wealth in New Jersey, one needs to have an income of more than $800,000. These high earners also pay one of the steepest tax rates in the country.

At what point are you considered wealthy?
Someone who has $1 million in liquid assets is usually considered to be a high net worth (HNW) individual. To have a very high net worth, one might need $5 million to $10 million or more.

What is considered wealthy in 2023?
Based on the Charles Schwab Modern Wealth Survey, having a net worth of $2.2 million will be considered wealthy in 2023.

Maybe you could supplement your puny income with a job picking fruit?
I hear there will be lots of job opportunities in farming now that Trump is deporting all the illegals!
 

Zeets2 » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

Well, maybe if you HAD read the entire link, you would have seen the category that shows me to be NOT ONLY in the top 20%, but also in the top 5%, and the top 1% of earners.

But of course, one you think you've found something that defends your own stupidity, you stop reading!
Not surprising that a dope like you never earned anywhere near those categories.

The link's HEADLINE was that the Trump tax cuts hurt New Jersey's MIDDLE CLASS.

You said the Trump tax cuts hurt you - and you live in New Jersey.

Do you know what a "syllogism" is? Not to be confused with silly gism, which produces mongoloids and libtards.
 

Cannonpointer » Today, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:03 am

The link's HEADLINE was that the Trump tax cuts hurt New Jersey's MIDDLE CLASS.

You said the Trump tax cuts hurt you - and you live in New Jersey.

Do you know what a "syllogism" is? Not to be confused with silly gism, which produces mongoloids and libtards.

Is that how you go through life?  Just reading headlines and ignoring the body of the story to learn the entire scope of the topic?

Is it any wonder why you're such a pauper and a loser?
As far as your own deductive reasoning goes, reading just a headline DOES NOT qualify you to comment on the facts in the remainder of the article.  Apparently, you don't mind looking like a fool when the rest of the story disputes whatever minimal information you were able to deduce from the title.

Not that I give a **** what economic status you think I have but it does show how ignorant losers choose to cut corners despite having the proof of the opposite contention of his retort right there in front of his dumb face when you're exposed as a liar!