Liberal Forum

Two If By Tea » 29 Jan 2025, 5:28 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 5:28 pm

Can ya break that dowm "Plain English" Too

Dont get me wrong ya "Good" in My Book so Far.

I also "'Respect" Ya too ya gotta "Mind" too

cannot be done since I am describing series parallel condition of spontaneously different simultaneously per individually alive in specificity with inhabiting space in the same moment.

Zeets2 » 29 Jan 2025, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 11:53 am

Were you too fooled to have lost the ability to defend your ignorance and your repeated lies?
If not, why can't you refute the definitions of wealth that I've posted repeatedly from knowledgeable sources?

 

I stopped perusing your links when the first one agreed with me that you are middle class, rube. Don't BRAG about your ability to Gish Gallop me. I don't play that ****.

I have no time for mouthy skirts.

31stArrival » 29 Jan 2025, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 2:50 pm

Wow, hired thug intimidator like Taipan being a mercenary for dictators and democracies protecting human rights to deny life daily and punish anyone resisting rule of law in both dictatorships and democracies defending God and country. the left and right hands of God molding ancestries into typecast people cradle to grave.

I undertand the manifested bigger picture of New World Order..

Taipan was a talker. 
 

Cannonpointer » 29 Jan 2025, 6:49 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 6:49 pm

Taipan was a talker. 
 

and you walk the talk. Again my instinctive accuracy is spot on.

Cannonpointer » 29 Jan 2025, 6:27 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 6:27 pm

I stopped perusing your links when the first one agreed with me that you are middle class, rube. Don't BRAG about your ability to Gish Gallop me. I don't play that ****.

I have no time for mouthy skirts.

Well, maybe if you HAD read the entire link, you would have seen the category that shows me to be NOT ONLY in the top 20%, but also in the top 5%, and the top 1% of earners.

But of course, one you think you've found something that defends your own stupidity, you stop reading!
Not surprising that a dope like you never earned anywhere near those categories.

So permit me to shove the quotes up your dumb *** again in closing.  Maybe this time you'll read the entire chart:

What is wealthy in New Jersey?
To be in the top 20% of earners in New Jersey, one needs to make at least $181,484 annually. To be in the top 5%, an income of at least $250,000 is required. The income controlled by the top 5% in New Jersey is 22.9%, which is the 16th highest.

What is the 1% wealth in New Jersey?
To be in the top 1% of wealth in New Jersey, one needs to have an income of more than $800,000. These high earners also pay one of the steepest tax rates in the country.

At what point are you considered wealthy?
Someone who has $1 million in liquid assets is usually considered to be a high net worth (HNW) individual. To have a very high net worth, one might need $5 million to $10 million or more.

What is considered wealthy in 2023?
Based on the Charles Schwab Modern Wealth Survey, having a net worth of $2.2 million will be considered wealthy in 2023.

Maybe you could supplement your puny income with a job picking fruit?
I hear there will be lots of job opportunities in farming now that Trump is deporting all the illegals!
 

Zeets2 » 30 Jan 2025, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2025, 10:51 am

Well, maybe if you HAD read the entire link, you would have seen the category that shows me to be NOT ONLY in the top 20%, but also in the top 5%, and the top 1% of earners.

But of course, one you think you've found something that defends your own stupidity, you stop reading!
Not surprising that a dope like you never earned anywhere near those categories.

The link's HEADLINE was that the Trump tax cuts hurt New Jersey's MIDDLE CLASS.

You said the Trump tax cuts hurt you - and you live in New Jersey.

Do you know what a "syllogism" is? Not to be confused with silly gism, which produces mongoloids and libtards.
 

Cannonpointer » 30 Jan 2025, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2025, 11:03 am

The link's HEADLINE was that the Trump tax cuts hurt New Jersey's MIDDLE CLASS.

You said the Trump tax cuts hurt you - and you live in New Jersey.

Do you know what a "syllogism" is? Not to be confused with silly gism, which produces mongoloids and libtards.

Is that how you go through life?  Just reading headlines and ignoring the body of the story to learn the entire scope of the topic?

Is it any wonder why you're such a pauper and a loser?
As far as your own deductive reasoning goes, reading just a headline DOES NOT qualify you to comment on the facts in the remainder of the article.  Apparently, you don't mind looking like a fool when the rest of the story disputes whatever minimal information you were able to deduce from the title.

Not that I give a **** what economic status you think I have but it does show how ignorant losers choose to cut corners despite having the proof of the opposite contention of his retort right there in front of his dumb face when you're exposed as a liar!

Zeets2 » 30 Jan 2025, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2025, 1:04 pm

Is that how you go through life?  Just reading headlines and ignoring the body of the story to learn the entire scope of the topic?

Is it any wonder why you're such a pauper and a loser?

Pauper?

Something tells me you don't have two coins to rub together, Clete.

Zeets2 » 30 Jan 2025, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2025, 1:04 pm

As far as your own deductive reasoning goes, reading just a headline DOES NOT qualify you to comment on the facts in the remainder of the article. 

It worked fine for me.

When the headline of your source refutes you, you're pretty stupid to use that source.

It becomes obvious that you just grab **** and slam it without even looking at it - a Gish Galloper who posts **** unworthy of attention.

Cannonpointer » 30 Jan 2025, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2025, 11:03 am

The link's HEADLINE was that the Trump tax cuts hurt New Jersey's MIDDLE CLASS.

You said the Trump tax cuts hurt you - and you live in New Jersey.

Do you know what a "syllogism" is? Not to be confused with silly gism, which produces mongoloids and libtards.
 

5 generation gaps exist in each of the 5 ancestral lineages occupying time today being the up to 8.2 billion people alive now, what is the middle class persons inahabiting space now are 8 great grandparent generation, 4 grandparent generation, 2 parenting original 16 great great grandparents to each arriving great great grandchild born daily forward 7 days a week trained to believe life only begins after birth and living intellectually lasts beyond dead, if one becomes 1 of 2 parents living forward now?

Middle class people aren't physically present based on economic situations geographically here today. Compounding chromosomes separate the DNA individually living eternally separated by heartbeats not time line semantics. This include you as much as myself and anything else native to this atmosphere.

Hell on earth ends the day you stop playing devil's advocate cradle to grave. Welcome to the actual Garden of Eden metaphor, when you change your mind.

Cannonpointer » 30 Jan 2025, 8:52 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jan 2025, 8:52 pm

Pauper?

Something tells me you don't have two coins to rub together, Clete.

It worked fine for me.

When the headline of your source refutes you, you're pretty stupid to use that source.

It becomes obvious that you just grab **** and slam it without even looking at it - a Gish Galloper who posts **** unworthy of attention.

Hey stupid!  The "headline" DID NOT refute anything!  It merely points out the first of several levels of the qualifications used to determine wealth.  And OF COURSE you read the rest of it.  The fact that you can't admit reading beyond the first line when I've posted it repeatedly tells me what a weak, feeble pauper you must be to be SO intimidated by someone else's wealth.

So allow me continue to shove it in your impoverished face, as I can only imagine how painful it must be for someone as destitute as you are to be reminded of what a failure you've been all your miserable life!:

What is considered upper class in NJ?To be considered upper class in New Jersey, it typically requires a high annual income. To put it into perspective:– To be in the top 20% of earners, you need to make at least $181,484 annually.– To be in the top 5%, you need to make at least $250,000 and up.
 What is the 1% wealth in New Jersey?To be in the top 1% of wealth in New Jersey:– You need to earn at least $800,000 annually.– High earners in this category pay one of the steepest tax rates in the country.

Did you read it NOW, you blubbering buffoon?
  
 

31stArrival » 29 Jan 2025, 4:43 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 4:43 pm

2 things wrong with your post?

I neither have my head up my *** or anything's penis in any orifice oral or anal.

Second and most obvious, I defend my position ancestally here as you protect ideas your ancestry obeyed so they can believe life isn't self evident daily you follow family traditions like there was a tomorrow 7 days a week 52 times a year while your body never exceeded adapting in the skin you're in your fertilized cell developed into since rotation conceived never became the same total sum again self evidently to your brain been the central nervous system of your time navigating life pretentiously in character protected by social consensus of people worshipping ideas now isn't eternity.

Choke you horse cock choking bastard. Babbling son of a **** stain.

TwoIfByTea » 29 Jan 2025, 5:28 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 5:28 pm

Can ya break that dowm "Plain English" Too

Dont get me wrong ya "Good" in My Book so Far.

I also "'Respect" Ya too ya gotta "Mind" too

You two stains are two sides of the same ***.