Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2024, 4:48 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2024, 4:48 pm

If @*HooooeyVagina welshes on this deal,  @Cannonpointer  will adjust tiny's handle for 1 month, to reflect his **** character.

Agree to the conditions and ask your question.

Umm, two things.  How can one welsh on a deal they never agreed to?

I will give you one chance and one chance only.  If you PG this, you lose. If you PG any of our conversation if you agree, you lose and the deal is off.   If you fail to post the question you responded to, you lose.  If you agree to those terms I will post the information here.  

*Huey » 04 Dec 2024, 4:59 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 4:59 pm

Umm, two things.  How can one welsh on a deal they never agreed to?

I will give you one chance and one chance only.  If you PG this, you lose. If you PG any of our conversation if you agree, you lose and the deal is off.   If you fail to post the question you responded to, you lose.  If you agree to those terms I will post the information here.

1) you can't welsh on what you've been running scairt from

2) you, being a lying little twat, don't have the right to dictate terms & conditions.

3) You have nothing to offer.

Accept the terms in the OP..

Further waffling will be taken as abject surrender.
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:36 am

Here, @*HooooeyVagina....

Don't be scairt..

You DO understand that I don't follow you girls' convos, right?

It's rhetorical. It has to be, as you dodge all questions and have no character - not even any understanding of what character is, such that your use of the word is dishonest implicitly. 
 

*Huey » Today, 4:59 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 4:59 pm

Umm, two things.  How can one welsh on a deal they never agreed to?

I will give you one chance and one chance only.  If you PG this, you lose. If you PG any of our conversation if you agree, you lose and the deal is off.   If you fail to post the question you responded to, you lose.  If you agree to those terms I will post the information here.

I am absolutely shocked the fruitcake did not PG this. 
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2024, 4:48 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2024, 4:48 pm

If @*HooooeyVagina welshes on this deal,  @Cannonpointer  will adjust tiny's handle for 1 month, to reflect his **** character.

Agree to the conditions and ask your question.

Why the **** is "answering a question" a thing for you?

You are posting on a political chat board, you **** monkey. It's ANONYMOUS, you **** monkey. 

Man up and start answering questions, you weak queer. If and when you begin answering questions, you question-ducking ***, anyone ducking yours will bring shame on themselves. As it stands now, the proper response to any question YOU pose is

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
 

Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 6:19 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 6:19 pm

1) you can't welsh on what you've been running scairt from

2) you, being a lying little twat, don't have the right to dictate terms & conditions.

3) You have nothing to offer.

Accept the terms in the OP..

Further waffling will be taken as abject surrender.

I accept your surrender.  You had your chance, Daddy’s Cumbucket.  ;)

 

*Huey » 05 Dec 2024, 5:09 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 5:09 am

I accept your surrender.  You had your chance, Daddy’s Cumbucket.  

Melty,

Accept the conditions.

Ask your question.




 

*Huey » 04 Dec 2024, 4:59 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 4:59 pm

Umm, two things.  How can one welsh on a deal they never agreed to?

I will give you one chance and one chance only.  If you PG this, you lose. If you PG any of our conversation if you agree, you lose and the deal is off.   If you fail to post the question you responded to, you lose.  If you agree to those terms I will post the information here.  

 

@Blackvegetable  

*Huey » 14 Jan 2025, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2025, 2:50 pm

@Blackvegetable

It's not about YOUR terms and conditions.


 

Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2025, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2025, 2:51 pm

It's not about YOUR terms and conditions.


 

 

It is not about your either.  It is about the fact that when serverely **** and get caught you have to start a dedicated thread.  Yo do this to run from the facts you missed on the original thread.  Then you come to your dedicated thread, reframe, and lie.

And remove factual posts that nail you.  

As far as tagging I did what I did because like ST you abused it.  Tagging people 5 or 6 times a day in threads where they were not participating, begging for their attention.  Read that again.  That is important part you always leave out.  

*Huey » 14 Jan 2025, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2025, 2:55 pm

It is not about your either. It is about the fact that when serverely **** and get caught you have to start a dedicated thread.  Yo do this to run from the facts you missed on the original thread.  Then you come to your dedicated thread, reframe, and lie.

And remove factual posts that nail you.  

As far as tagging I did what I did because like ST you abused it.  Tagging people 5 or 6 times a day in threads where they were not participating, begging for their attention.  Read that again.  That is important part you always leave out.

No...it very much is.

I know....it's my thread.

Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2025, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2025, 2:57 pm

No...it very much is.

I know....it's my thread.

 

Well, you got your answers to two questions.  Don't ask again.  

*Huey » 14 Jan 2025, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2025, 2:59 pm

Well, you got your answers to two questions.  Don't ask again.

You've answered no questions on this thread.

*Huey » 14 Jan 2025, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2025, 2:55 pm

It is not about your either.  It is about the fact that when serverely **** and get caught you have to start a dedicated thread.  Yo do this to run from the facts you missed on the original thread.  Then you come to your dedicated thread, reframe, and lie.

And remove factual posts that nail you.  

As far as tagging I did what I did because like ST you abused it.  Tagging people 5 or 6 times a day in threads where they were not participating, begging for their attention.  Read that again.  That is important part you always leave out.  

 

Blackvegetable
Child Groomer, Sexual PredatorPosts: 33125Contact: 
Contact BlackvegetableMoney: 234,006                    

• [url=javascript:;]Nominate[/url]
• Report
• [url=javascript:;]Multi Quote[/url]
• Quote

*Huey » Today, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑
Today, 1:07 pm
Yeah, and the list of people who are using it because of you is growing by the day.Why is that?

@Blackvegetable  

*Huey » 14 Jan 2025, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2025, 3:14 pm

@Blackvegetable

I'm sure you have a narrative....

But I'm asking about anything which can be demonstrated..

Set the acceptable daily limit of tags and let's see who is "abusing" them....

Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2025, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2025, 3:19 pm

But I'm asking about 


 

because of course you are. It's all you do. Hide! 

As always, you haven't answered any questions. 

Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2025, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2025, 3:19 pm

I'm sure you have a narrative....

But I'm asking about anything which can be demonstrated..

Set the acceptable daily limit of tags and let's see who is "abusing" them....

 

Nah, I am just going to keep things the way they are.  It really burns your ***.  

I guess I am done on this thread.

 

*Huey » 14 Jan 2025, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2025, 2:55 pm

It is not about your either.  It is about the fact that when serverely **** and get caught you have to start a dedicated thread.  Yo do this to run from the facts you missed on the original thread.  Then you come to your dedicated thread, reframe, and lie.

And remove factual posts that nail you.  

As far as tagging I did what I did because like ST you abused it.  Tagging people 5 or 6 times a day in threads where they were not participating, begging for their attention.  Read that again.  That is important part you always leave out.

Your self serving lies are to be expected....you're a liar, of course you will lie.

What I am looking for is something we can actually confirm...

You know how your assertions always suffer under scrutiny,,,


unless, of course, you're just projecting....


again.

*Huey » 14 Jan 2025, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2025, 3:21 pm

Nah, I am just going to keep things the way they are.  It really burns your ***.  

I guess I am done on this thread.

It doesn't "burn my ***".....it is a symbol of your cowardice and hypocrisy...

It's a good look on you.

Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2025, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2025, 2:51 pm

It's not about YOUR terms and conditions.


 

nor yours.